this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
25 points (66.7% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

4058 readers
867 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have a feeling that, of all the Treks he didn't produce, he'd have liked Lower Decks the most. It's still mostly "humans got better" future, which I think was his core tenant.

TNG was also very much


not utopian; I can't think of a word that implies that the human race evolved socially; "utopia" would imply everything was perfect for everybody. But he obviously hoped we'd be progressive.

I love DS9, but it's a step backwards socially. There's a darkness in the Federation. It's there in most of the other series, post-TNG, and maybe a little in later TNG seasons, too.

The culmination of all this is the newest series, Section 31. All of Roddenberry's ideals have simply been shit-canned. The Federation has a black ops section that's basically cold war CIA; they go around assassinating people and manipulating cultures.

I think this just reflects the zeitgeist. It's hard to be optimistic now, whereas when ST:TOS was produced we were on the moon, the cold war was fading, and mankind was reaching for the stars. TOS reflects that, and Section 31 reflects exactly how optimistic we are about the future, and current affairs.

It's depressing. And - to get back to my premise - while Lower Decks was faithful to cannon, and didn't ignore Section 31, I felt it captured the original general optimism about the future: that we'd be a better, more progressive society. And I think that would have appealed to Roddenberry.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ahh don't you blame DS9 for kurtzmann's bullshit. Cherry picking motherfucker has warped concepts.

You literally have DS9 going "section 31 is the antithesis of everything we wish to be, we need to destroy this antiquated cancer" and kurtz is in the corner scribbling down notes on how to build the puppy mincing machine

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not blaming DS9! It's one of my favorites in the series. But it really didn't feel like Star Trek; it was petty dark, most of the time, with a lot of questionable ethics. It was all rationalized and the setting made absolute sense, but still... it strayed far from TOS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

not really, I mean in-universe TOS had a death penalty for going to a planet of superpowered telepaths. Women couldn't be starship captains....and lemme tell you as a woman, there are a lot of problems with TOS.

a lot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Women couldn't be starship captains

Couldn't be? Is that cannon from TOS, or do we just have no examples of women captains? Which episode was that in? I can believe it, but it would surprise me. Uhura was a full lieutenant, which is an officer rank.

But, yeah, it was a broadcast television series produced in the 60's and a lot of that seeped through despite Roddenberry's efforts to normalize interracial relationships and minority equality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude. infamously turnabout intruder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had always interpreted that as Starfleet not allowing captains to be married, and also that she was also genuinely unfit for command herself. But looking into it, I see that apparently Roddenberry later stated that the comments did actually refer to women not being allowed to be captains. And that he had immediately regretted adding that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that "if only" was a shit note to end the series on. "If only she could be content with being a second class citizen..." cheer trek, thanks for that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You hit the nail on the head.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Your username, ironically, underscores that it wasn't all optimistic progressive future. Although, I guess that was a decade later; the space race had mostly wound down, we'd been through disco and punk was peaking.

No, the missing letter did not escape my attention.