this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
314 points (98.8% liked)

movies

2127 readers
171 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Adam McKay says the Jennifer Lawrence and Leonardo DiCaprio-starring satire resonates with a widespread feeling of being deceived by government and media

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NineMileTower 143 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I liked the movie. The metaphor was as subtle as a club to the forehead, but it was entertaining and meaningful.

[–] deacon 64 points 1 week ago

The unsubtlety of the metaphor is the metaphor though.

I honestly think this will be a future classic if society survives long enough for such things.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The metaphor was as subtle as a club to the forehead

Count me in as someone who missed the club to the forehead. I enjoyed the whole movie, then said to my wife "wow they really went hard on drawing all those parallels to COVID."

My wife nicely informed me that the movie was actually about climate change.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

It's mostly about climate change, but I don't think you missed it if you thought Covid.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Not subtle enough. Some conspiracy theorists think it’s about the Covid vaccine.

[–] TheDuffmaster 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

That's my issue with the movie. People who don't believe in climate change aren't going to have their mind changed by a club, but need to be tricked with something subtle. Nothing entrenches someone deeper into their views then calling someone an idiot or telling them they're wrong. The movie represents everything that's wrong with how progressives and the "liberal elite" like McKay try and convince people to come to their side. If anything, this movie probably just furthered the divide. Having Leo in it probably didn't help, conservatives love to point out the hypocrisy of his private jet and yacht.

I say this as someone who worked on the Bernie Sanders campaign and have talked to him about how to change non-progressives minds, although I'm not sure he's made much progress either. Maybe a little more than McKay.

So who is this movie for, if not to sway climate deniers? If it was really intended to let a liberal audience grandstand and circlejerk about how they're so much smarter then everyone else (which I'm not denying), then I guess it did a pretty good job of that.

Edit: full disclosure as a movie also didn't enjoy it, jokes were kinda too on the nose. Also just felt and looked like a Netflix movie, kinda plastic. Idiocracy was way funnier.

[–] Blum0108 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sometimes it's nice for people who believe in climate change to get a little validation, as a treat.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

*Points at LA firestorm*

Take the treats back!
I’m tired of being validated year after year with record temperatures and disasters.

[–] TheDuffmaster 3 points 1 week ago

Exactly haha, I get enough real life traumatic validation if I turn on the news for a second or look out my window

[–] glimse 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So who is this movie for, if not to sway climate deniers?

This might sound crazy....but this movie is for people who like watching movies....

[–] hightrix 6 points 1 week ago

Right? It is a comedy by Adam McKay. That alone is enough to draw an audience.

[–] TheBat 2 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Does a movie need to do anything else other than be entertaining?

I doubt the idea was to actually change anyone's mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 week ago (4 children)

the movie was gloriously frustrating.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

Great description of it.

[–] themeatbridge 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't bring myself to watch it. I saw a trailer, and my blood started to boil.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it does... but while it does, it still is a movie that sticks with you in other ways....

[–] themeatbridge 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I also have nightmares about the apocalypse. Ever since I had kids, I would have dreams about inescapable volcanoes or tidal waves and just feel completely hopeless. I don't need to watch movies about it. See also: 2012, The Walking Dead, The Road, A Quiet Place, the Day After Tomorrow, Deep Impact, The Mist, etc.

[–] spankmonkey 16 points 1 week ago

20 years ago it would have been considered a farce!

[–] anon6789 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't really know what it was about, and I watched it shortly after the November elections. I thought it was funny, but did I ever pick a bad time to watch it. It lost a lot of the overall joke feeling and while still farcical, now it's a little too close to reality.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

That's how I feel, too. I appreciate the movie, but god will I never watch it again. It caused so much dread in me.

[–] Moops 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah audience scores are my jam. Critics have failed me time and time again.

[–] TheFonz 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What is up with that??? Lately I find myself aligning a lot more with audience scores. Movies that critics are rating high leave no impression on me anymore and I'm an obsessed movie watcher.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

It feels like critics are too busy huffing their own farts and generally audience scores are a larger sample size

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This movie is painful to watch. I'm sort of glad for those who don't have children.

[–] toynbee 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think this is complimenting the movie, but I'm uncertain of your intent.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, it is a compliment to the movie. It's mostly Climate Change for me, as I live in a coast area where we already suffered all sorts of things because of it. But it seems there is little can be done to stop those who chose to ignore the evidences.

Edit: And sorry for my English if I haven't explant myself better. It is far from my first language.

[–] toynbee 5 points 1 week ago

There is no need to apologize for your language. I don't know what your native one is, but I'm sure I'd be far less competent in yours than you are in mine. Well done for conveying your message!

I'm sorry about what you seem to be describing as a fairly hopeless environment. May I ask whereabout you are?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Critics didn't like it? I've seen it twice and think it's great!

[–] kitnaht 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Critics didn't like it? Say less! I'm in!

[–] krashmo 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For real though, film critics are largely useless these days. It's like they can't tell the difference between a film made for Cannes and a film made for a lazy Sunday afternoon. Not everything needs to be deep and meaningful on a personal level. Films shouldn't be penalized for not being something they were never intended to be.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I get what you're saying but film critics don't rate for enjoyment or suitability in some situations but for the quality of the film.

The Cannes film probably is objectively better as a work of cinematic art and worthy of the 9.2 score whereas your lazy Sunday afternoon flick is a 6.8.

If you're feeling lazy and don't want to think much then pick whatever because that critic rating says nothing about the enjoyment value of the film.

It's like restaurants. No-one is going to argue that a Michelin star restaurant isn't a more refined experience than the pizza shop down the street. But 90% of the time you'd prefer a pizza. But celebrating a 40th birthday, let's go fancy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I couldn't make it through, that whole start scene with the suited cunts talking over and mocking just triggered huge aggro.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I found it difficult to watch when i did due to the situation, maybe not right in covid but not out of it either. As depressing as it made me feel at points (girlfriends choice of movie so had to sit through it but we alternate so only fair) I found it amusing that while plainly satire the actual dialogue and actions were pretty much what at least one democratically elected administration showed during a huge crisis. If it aired 10 years previous it'd probably be in the bin of crappy spoof movies for being so ridiculous and maybe get a cult folowing, yet it was practically a documentary with the situation changed.

I can understand not feeling comfortable due to the triggering in it though, it wasn't exactly a fun watch even if it was a comedy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh I'm disgusted by that behaviour irl, so i'm disgusted by it on screen. I do not think i'm the target audience for this film, i consider climate deniers to be traitors against humanity

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

It wasn't till I read you original comment that I remembered how awful I felt at one point watching it, I get it and understand not wanting to subject yourself to that sort of feeling willingly. Thankfully it passed and I was able to watch, but I won't say I enjoyed it, just that in an art sense it has merit.

[–] JamesTBagg 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ha. Remember when Idiocracy was just a funny movie making fun of us and not prophecy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We're going to legalize prostitution? Have it so that you can get into any high paying job you want without a college degree while still automating the work no one wants to do? Put the smartest man in the world in charge of our worst problems, which we are acknowledging exist?

Seriously, Idiocracy is a utopia compared to reality, I will die on this hill.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PixellatedDave 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For me it was the end scene which broke me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jacksilver 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I only saw it cause it got a Oscar nomination and agree with the critics on this one.

It all felt a little off, like it was trying to be too many things at once. It jumped back and forth between what felt like parody/comedy/drama to the point it failed to do any particularly well. Or maybe it was a little too surreal to pull off the seriousness of the topic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The vibe that I feel McKay was going for is the Simpsons meme with Ralph on the bus chuckling about being in danger. It feels like a dramedy, but so close to reality that you can't help but have that reaction. It's not necessarily a call to action, just a hey wake up and see how close we are to this shit.

[–] Cycle0861 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

People who are convinced Climate change is a thing, don't need this kind of movies to act. People who are convinced Climate change is a hoax took this movie like an insult to their kind. You need to be a better storyteller if you're going to convince people are in the wrong, according to you, about something, otherwise they feel attacked

[–] takenaps 15 points 1 week ago

Fair, but I think there's still value in satire like this even if it doesn't achieve the goal of convincing the other side. It kinda serves to point at the absurdity from a fresh perspective

[–] mojofrododojo 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You need to be a better storyteller if you’re going to convince people are in the wrong, according to you, about something, otherwise they feel attacked

or perhaps they should be better, more informed consumers?

like, at some point people should be responsible for their own stupidity and self delusions.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ocassionallyaduck 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

When your movie is on the frontpage of Netflix with a handful of A listers and effectively "free", a half billion views is actually not that great. You were handed success on a silver platter.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure that every Netflix movie does not get 500,000,000 views.

[–] TrickDacy 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But on the other hand I don't think it's entirely fair to dismiss a number that high. I think it kind of reads like a film most people wouldn't necessarily watch if they viewed any info about it before watching it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I once had a conversation with someone about a hypothetical thing and they said it was the plot of this movie.

I eventually watched it after that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My GF hated it.

I watched it for the second time recently

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I just wanna die and join the absolute as described in the CIA Gateway Project files

load more comments
view more: next ›