353
Source (Bluesky)
And the best they could come up with was anthro shit?
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
353 points (91.9% liked)
Fuck AI
1627 readers
456 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
This is a true triumph of the human spirit.
As much as I like this post, it ain't true for digital 3d artists. While you can lay down some objects and stuff, it's still extremely limited.
I could be wrong but my impression has been a lot of 3D artists often have sculpting backgrounds or parallel interests because they carry a lot of the same general compositional principles.
load more comments
(1 replies)
What are the limitations? Not trying to start a fight, just wondering what’s on your mind that couldn’t be made in diorama form
True it could be made into diorama form, that would require a different set of skill to pull off, something you'll need to learn more in depth than just picking up a pencil
Are 3d artists the same thing as AI bros?
No, they are not.
No of course. I'm just saying the post doesn't cover all of the digital artists that aren't shitty
It doesn't need to, because the post is only about AI 'artists', not digital artists.
No no, it's on point. All the digital artists should be covered. They could claim that if 3d artists can't do art without a computer, then according to this post, they shouldn't be called artists too.
Digital 3d artists can generally also do physical sculptures because one is just a digital version of the other. They still understand how shapes in a 3d environment work, and how sizes and proportions work. All they need is a little clay.
People who do colors and textures digitally also understand how they work in the real world. They might be better using digitsl topls, but artists understand the process and can work with multiple mediums just by applying the same processes.
AI 'artists' use word prompts, which does not translate into the real world.
Among other criticisms, "using technology" does not mean something is "digital". The example on the rock seems to be analog from everything in the post above.
load more comments
(6 replies)
You could absolutely use AI to make art. Almost all AI content you find online isn't that though
load more comments
(1 replies)
If you take away an artist's brushes, they can't make art without making new brushes.
All this example shows is that brushes are easier to make yourself than a LLM is.
I don't like AI art, but I don't think this particular argument proves anything meaningful.
load more comments
(10 replies)