this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
301 points (94.1% liked)

196

16774 readers
3629 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soleos 8 points 1 day ago

This is not a generational shift. The iron dome of irony is a tried and true coping technique for the brutality of teenage culture where the rule of cool rules with an iron fist and being uncool means social death. And what is cool shifts at a moment's notice, yet uncool is forever. So normies learn to armour themselves by treating everything ironically to pre-empt any whiff of uncool. Because at the very least, it's never uncool to make fun of something. This carries forward into one's 20s when some begin to rediscover the coolness of being authentic, sincere, and genuine regardless of what others think. So then you have the reaction of radical acceptance, not yucking others' yum, respect for others' interests, etc. GenX had their equivalent, even Boomers. It's part of growing up. And of course not everyone gets there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

what killed the internet is information overload. in many way no one can have a private or closed space. twitter for example you are bombarded with everyone's thought on everything and before long you have a lot of information about things you dont care about, and no way to engage properly with just one of those things. you can be vulnerable on the internet, but in a mostly public and algorithmic internet, its gonna be exposed to so many people who will hate that.

[–] centipede_powder 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yep, not a single post of irony on the Internet before zoomers.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Absolutely true. Usenet was completely devoid of irony, outside of alt.science.metallurgy, of course.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This reminds me of what David Foster Wallace wrote: "The next real literary "rebels" in this country might well emerge as some weird bunch of anti-rebels, born oglers who dare somehow to back away from ironic watching, who have the childish gall actually to endorse and instantiate single-entendre principles. Who treat of plain old untrendy human troubles and emotions in U.S. life with reverence and conviction. Who eschew self-consciousness and hip fatigue. These anti-rebels would be outdated, of course, before they even started. Dead on the page. Too sincere. Clearly repressed. Backward, quaint, naive, anachronistic. Maybe that'll be the point. Maybe that's why they'll be the next real rebels. Real rebels, as far as I can see, risk disapproval. The old postmodern insurgents risked the gasp and squeal: shock, disgust, outrage, censorship, accusations of socialism, anarchism, nihilism. Today's risks are different. The new rebels might be artists willing to risk the yawn, the rolled eyes, the cool smile, the nudged ribs, the parody of gifted ironists, the "Oh how banal". To risk accusations of sentimentality, melodrama. Of overcredulity. Of softness. Of willingness to be suckered by a world of lurkers and starers who fear gaze and ridicule above imprisonment without law. Who knows."

[–] I_Has_A_Hat 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is David Foster Wallace a word-smith? Maybe. Critics and reviewers certainly seem to think so.

Personally, he writes far too densely for my tastes. His points get lost in an avalanche of flowery, intellectual language that, even with context clues, I'm never quite sure I'm interpreting right. In the above quote, for example, just what the hell does "endorse and instantiate single-entendre principles" actually mean?

The man also seems to detest paragraphs. That, or he loves them far too much; and ensures they are as long and intimidating as possible. Reading Infinite Jest, you'll often come across blocks of text that are multiple pages long with no breaks.

It's not like he isn't insightful though, it's just that uncovering what he's trying to say is a chore.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If I remember correctly, and I don't have the quote for this, but I think he once said that he was aware that Infinite Jest takes effort to read. It wasn't a deliberate choice to make it difficult for the sake of being difficult, but that it was difficult because we're no longer used to putting in the effort into reading. The deal must be that if you do the work, the story will reward you for it. Any book can be made difficult to read, but if they do it for the sake of being difficult, you will not want to read more from that author I guess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Cringe is life.

[–] [email protected] 117 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I feel like I saw people saying this back in 2007 (with different terminology, ofc). Kids just like in-jokes and being ironic. It's not ruining the Internet, big business is what's ruining the Internet.

[–] cristo 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Back in 2007 Jagex ruined the Internet by adding the EOC update to Runescape

[–] finitebanjo 3 points 2 days ago

EoC came later, 2007 was the summoning update. EoC was 2012.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Lol, yikes, that guy was all "sarcasm liked the Internet" like it was his religion and he was 💯% wrong. It's like, check out my next Ted talk on how onomatopeia killed the telegram. Lol, can you imagine? 💀💀💀 (/s, obvi 🙄)

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago

Right. When we were all laughing at the people who would have genuine reactions to things people would say to them on the internet because "the internet is serious business lmao," that was totally fine and a different thing. It's those damn zoomers that fucked it all up. Right.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The internet is suffering from commodification not irony. on top of all the ads people are happy to commodify themselves as if they don’t put in enough time doing that at work already

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

I say a lot of people get posters madness.

They get so addicted to the dopamine feedback of upvotes and follower counts and occasionally actual money that they abandon themselves in hopes of becoming exactly the person that will get them the most dopamine feedback.

Everyone that participates in social media suffers from it to a small degree but there is a threshold upon which it can turn you into a p-noid zombie, which is typically right around the fame threshold.

The only way back is for your entire profile and sometimes career to come crashing down around you.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I agree with this post with 4 layers of ironic sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Since there's an even number of sarcasm layers I appreciate your sincerity.

[–] Stern 23 points 3 days ago

i am cringe but i am free

[–] Vinny_93 22 points 3 days ago

Oof that's ironic

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean that concept is a thing that does exist, but the internet is doing fine. Its inevitably gonna get better again at some point, both technology wise and socially.

[–] nifty 7 points 2 days ago

Federated, decentralized and open source platforms are saving the internet. Everything else is pretty trash.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Peoples creativity online is still VERY alive. Like omg some people on TikTok are doing some very interesting stuff out there.

Greed is the issue, not normal people (though they till suck sometimes)

[–] finitebanjo 2 points 2 days ago

A lot of people confuse my arrogance for irony.