this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
2117 points (98.7% liked)

memes

10810 readers
2751 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I love how Luigi has become a defacto symbol of the revolution. I can't imagine Nintendo being happy about it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 9 points 6 days ago

Seriously. Their boardroom must be up in arms about it not being Mario.

[–] amon 4 points 6 days ago

They will probably reference it in the next Mario movie.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I mean. There's no such thing as bad advertising, supposedly. I doubt this would violate that statement.

[–] CitizenKong 10 points 5 days ago

Another fun fact, billionaires and their lifestyles emmit more carbon pollution in 90 minutes than the average person in their lifetimes.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I haven't actually done the math, but by percentages I think they are probably fairly close.

[–] MidsizedSedan 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Its not hard to look up school shooting fatalities, but it would be depressing

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In total, you'd only need four numbers:

  • The total number of school aged children
  • The number of school aged children who died due to violent crime
  • The total number of billionaires
  • The total number of billionaires who died due to violent crime
[–] Unlearned9545 2 points 6 days ago

Rate could mean over time or percentage of. I think OP was thinking of time, in which case your wouldn't need the total number of schoolchildren. Just divide the population of billionaires by the number of schoolchildren that die by violent crime per year.

[–] MidsizedSedan 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Welp that sucked.

69 deaths in 2024 (323 school shootings in 1 year. More school shootings than school days. What are you doing there?)*

And

400+ billionaires the poorest is 3.3B

So 2024 had 1 Billionare death, at this rate, we need 399 more years...

*I forgot to add. Both this source and me are not american. Feel free to correct me with a more local source

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

More numbers for people to play with. "Since 1999, 440 people have been killed and 1,243 injured in shooting events at K-12 schools."

https://www.security.org/blog/a-timeline-of-school-shootings-since-columbine/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

If I'm reading the hypothetical right, it's saying what if in a year, the numbers were reversed... 323 $hootings with 69 deaths, versus 1 school shooting with 1 death.

Would gun laws change, would tax laws change? Etc etc. Would minimum wage change?

Purely hypothetical of course

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

So what you are saying is we have plenty supply of school children and not enough billionaires? Let's see how we can get more billionaires then. Or do you want to reduce the number of school children? Because that is being worked on constantly...America, you have the freedom to get killed by someone with mental issues anytime.

[–] damnedfurry 1 points 6 days ago

So, who here didn't know that there are several orders of magnitude more kids than there are billionaires?

lol

[–] [email protected] 131 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Only if the wealth is redistributed to the masses though.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah exactly. Normal inheritance means their kids or spouse inherit, and the number of billionaires remains the same.

[–] donescobar 89 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Fun fact, if I were to inherit the wealth of a billionaire family member who was shot in public I’d get philanthropic real fast!

[–] RQG 44 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Many people say this. However of those who talk the talk, barely any ever walk the walk.

However I think if you are born an heir to a billionaire, you'd lack the perspective which might foster selfless philanthropy.

I'd like to think that if someone from the working class would randomly get such money they would. But it still seems unlikely.

[–] damnedfurry 3 points 6 days ago

I'd like to think that if someone from the working class would randomly get such money they would. But it still seems unlikely.

Almost all big lottery winners are working class. Look at what they do with their winnings on average, you don't need to guess.

[–] glitchdx 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

self preservation isn't a selfless motive, but if it results in philanthropy then that's a win.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago

but if not, and they have two or more children ic tje amount gets split between them. Then you handlo those, and their children etc. It's financial homeopathy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Starting a psyop on 4chan for making edgy school shooter wannabes start aiming at billionaires instead.

"You see anon, it's not that girls don't like you or that your class has 1 non-white person in cornbread America, it's that billionaires are leeches in society, and the cops they own would stop you. Don't fire at classmates, fire at the upper class."

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For good measure point out that people migrating into the country are often because the 1% are offering them otherwise high paying jobs at below minimum wage, but thanks to the exchange rate that's like a million dollars an hour back in their home country.

Don't make it obvious that you're on the Left or they'll ignore you on principle. Make it sound like you're "one of them"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

My OCD wonders if they factored in having to assassinate the heirs of the CEOs who immediately become billionaires, recursively until every fortune has been divvied up so many ways nobody has a billion anymore. Cuz that would be necessary if you really want to "run out" of billionaires, and would also mean you advocate executing children for inheriting a lot of money. This does require thinking beyond the simple meme, but go ahead - you can do it!

[–] varjen 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unlike royalty the transfer of wealth isn't instant so if you work fast enough you can achieve a brief window when there are no billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wealthy people likely have a living trust and the next trustee picks up immediately without needing time-consuming procedures like probate.

[–] ZoopZeZoop 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People might be reluctant to assume possession of billions if people were murdering/ systematically killing billionaires. So, it might be achieved relatively quickly.

[–] FordBeeblebrox 7 points 6 days ago

Sure you can have the infinite money stone. All you have to do is make it past everyone who will suffer to power it, there’s a lot more of them than you and they are hungry

[–] LovableSidekick 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I get the impression a brief window isn't the goal, but in this thread rationalization might be.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

I wonder what that particular scenario's Gini coëfficient versus Cumulative Assassinations plot looks like. Sounds like the plot for a new season of Death Note.

[–] FordBeeblebrox 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Compare the number of size S body bags used every time the cops gather to watch another “mentally troubled loner” to the average number of immediate family over 18 size of each billionaire, kids would have a trust fund guardian you’d rather capture than kill. All in all you’d probably expend a lot less ammo for more benefit going top down. Hypothetically of course.

[–] LovableSidekick 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Any reason to prefer capturing trust fund guardians rather than killing them? I mean, the base plan doesn't call for checking how the original billionaire got their money or assessing them personally. We're operating strictly at meme level - controlling enormous wealth is evil. "Kill them! Kill them all!" Anybody who decides to wuss out and start adding constraints could be a shill or an apologist - at any rate it doesn't show full commitment to Sparkle Motion.

[–] FordBeeblebrox 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Ironically, moreso for legal reasons than anything else. If Jeeves becomes the sole guardian of the kids’ inheritance, offing him means you lose the passwords to the offshore accounts and control of the trust goes to some extended family member or the bank itself. If he can be coerced or turned, you’ve a much easier route to accessing the funds, buying the company that makes school lunches and telling them to knock it the fuck off charging children for food.

We don’t need to kill them all, just enough to make the rest realize that “number go up” doesn’t mean much when you see a torch and pitchfork every time you look out a window.

E) This is assuming all banks and lawyers follow legal procedure, which may go out the window along with the first publicly defenestrated billionaire so…I’m not sure how we go about getting all the digital bank notes but I’m just a grunt who exits the plane early, that’s a question for someone smarter

[–] Allonzee 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

Also, only about 28,000 hundred-million-plus-inaires on Earth.

For perspective, significantly more Palestinians have already been casually genocided by our bestie trade partner in that current conflict.

The blight upon our civilization of billions is not that large.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/10/10/number-of-people-with-100-million-has-doubled-since-2003.html

I'm not even suggesting they be adjusted, because I'm not a sociopath like they are. Use an economic guillotine, confiscate their exploitation gotten hoards for the commons(yes nationalize essential industries like utilities and Healthcare so they're owned by society), reshape the economy to stop rewarding speculative gambling with exploitation gotten chips over honest labor and vocations like teachers that keep civilization running, obviously institute a maximum wealth cap as other people live in this society going forward to prevent recurrance, bring their ego scores to zero for their murderous greed, let them keep $20 and give each of them a set of literal, cheap bootstraps, and let them get a real job.

Bar them from forming any kind of corporate entities or investing in anything other than a standard savings account for life, just as people convicted of computer crimes are sometimes barred from operating computers as they've proven they're a danger to others with them.

I'd be shocked if half of them didn't take themselves out of the equation suddenly being subject to the same reality as their current livestock.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] GeneralEmergency 32 points 1 week ago (8 children)

That would involve people actually doing something rather than waiting for someone else.

And even then you guys would fall into conspiracy theories because you can't believe someone actually did something.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So many heirs tho...

What do we do if their heirs just inherit it?

Anakin Skywalker time? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They'd get generous quickly if we kept the guillotines lubricated

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] FordBeeblebrox 5 points 6 days ago

And I want my scalps!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›