this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
284 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19223 readers
3085 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pjwestin 42 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

A 74-year-old who is dying of cancer was chosen over a 35-year-old rising star at the insistence of an 84-year-old woman (who is currently undergoing hip replacement surgery) just months after an 81-year-old Presidential candidate was forced to drop out of the race because he showed sever symptoms of cognitive decline during a debate. If this were a satire about a gerontocracy, I would think it was too over the top.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And a 78 year old is president elect

[–] pjwestin 1 points 5 hours ago

Oh yeah, if we're talking Republicans too, don't forget that the 82-year-old Senate minority leader, who has had mysterious freezing spells this year, was hospitalized for a fall just last week.

[–] BigBenis 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

That does it for me. I'm changing my voter registration to independent. This party no longer represents me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

As a young voter, I've always been Independent because I knew Democratic party was shit.

[–] demizerone 3 points 10 hours ago

I did mine the day after they lost to trump again. This party needs to die so a real oligarch opposition party can take it's place.

[–] whotookkarl 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunate, but it'll give her more time to work with Bernie and labor leaders to organize a general strike

[–] Kyrgizion 1 points 9 hours ago

They will never let her. She'll get the Bernie treatment time and again.

[–] buddascrayon 63 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Everyone sort of made the case that they would be the best to help change the message across the country. ... He's a very good communicator," said Beyer.

Oh yeah that's exactly what's going to fix the problem Democrats have. Electing another old ass Clinton era Democrat to a position of power. It's not like everybody's pissed at them for losing the Presidency, the House, and the Senate all in one go.

[–] Ensign_Crab 24 points 1 day ago

It’s not like everybody’s pissed at them for losing the Presidency, the House, and the Senate all in one go.

With their amazing communication skills.

[–] Shardikprime 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

See it from their perspective. They are doing their hardest to be as useless as possible and people still vote them.

At this point, how pissed everyone is matters jack shit because they know their public loves outrage for the sake of outrage, and the very same public that votes them, is totally neutered and incapable of choosing or voting for anything else

[–] reddit_sux 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They are using the fact that people can't go anywhere else and are weaponising that to do absolutely nothing.

[–] Shardikprime 1 points 3 hours ago

They have played their voter base for absolute fools

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Gerry Connolly more like Gerry Atric.

If AOC sticks with the Democratic party instead of going independent she proves the DNC was right to deny her power. Why bother caving to AOC'S demands if she will keep sheepdogging people to the party and get nothing in return?

[–] thisphuckinguy 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

She lost to a 74yr old…yeah that guy needs to retire. Get out of the fucking way.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

Democrats running out of foot to shoot themselves in

[–] Maggoty 113 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

AOC runs several investigations that lead to results.

Connelly... Is old and has seniority.

Great fucking job Democrats. Getting my seat warmer ready for ~~2022~~ 2026 already!

[–] finitebanjo 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty 2 points 18 hours ago
[–] xenomor 195 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I’m glad congressional Democrats are finally taking steps to deal with their sclerotic, ineffective and increasingly out-of-touch leadership and building a future with younger—oh wait.

[–] ceenote 68 points 1 day ago (9 children)

The thing that made me so pessimistic about the future of this country was when I learned that the people who advised Hillary's 2016 campaign were still advising Harris' 2024 campaign. They failed multiple times and the consequences have been catastrophic, but they held on to their positions anyway. I have no reason to think they won't be back in 2028, because the people who have a say in who gets party leadership are people selected by the old leadership. We need a borderline hostile takeover of the Democrat party, and after Trump did it to the Republicans, the existing powers in the Democrat party only entrenched themselves further.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

The mayor from Jaws 1 was still the mayor in Jaws 2.

[–] Ensign_Crab 21 points 1 day ago

They failed multiple times and the consequences have been catastrophic,

They succeeded in the only thing that matters to Democratic leadership: They kept a progressive from winning the nomination.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (52 children)

AOC should abandon the Democratic party. She should join Bernie as an god-damned Independent.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She and Bernie should start a progressive party.

I'm tired of Democrats bowing to oligarchs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

I read that as Democrats blowing oligarchs... Same feel tho

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong 135 points 1 day ago (29 children)

Shit like this (Pelosi putting her thumb on the scale) is why people are questioning if they'll ever vote Democrat again.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Shit like this (Pelosi putting her thumb on the scale) is why people are questioning if they’ll ever vote Democrat again.

Yep, 100% this is at Pelosi's feet. Fuck Nancy Pelosi, and honsestly fuck every D Boomer in congress who won't get out of the way for the younger generations. You are actively holding us back.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago

HEADLINE: AFTER SEVERAL BEATINGS, DEMOCRATS LEARN NO LESSONS

More the stupid us for thinking things would be any different this time.

[–] AbidanYre 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What they're saying: Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), a Connolly ally, acknowledged Connolly's greater seniority likely played a role in his win but argued "it wasn't just that."

It wasn't just that. He also has a penis

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (5 children)

AOC loses key vote in House Oversight race to Gerry Connolly

[–] FuglyDuck 60 points 1 day ago (6 children)

an Old. White. man.

Seriously. It's pissing me off; more so the republicans doing it. we need minority voices. We can't expect the republicans to do it- lets just be honest here. and I doubt very much if Connolly will be able to push back nearly as much as AOC can and will. (never mind, whether or not he's willing.)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›