this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
686 points (99.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6850 readers
250 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
686
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Eurofighter Typhoon shenanigans

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 236 points 1 month ago

When you literally add "if you commit real life treason, we will ban you from our videogame forums" and it still doesn't work.

[–] DaddleDew 176 points 1 month ago (8 children)

No force is stronger than the autistic urge to correct something that is wrong in the special area of interest.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

Damn straight...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's practically a weekly occurrence at this point.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Surely we can do better. Daily?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stupidcasey 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I had a nickel every time someone posted classified documents in the WarThunder forums I would have ~~2~~ ~~3~~ Enough.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Disagreeing with the moderators is also against the rules.

At least they admit it.

[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They didn't say disagreeing with moderators, they said disagreeing with moderation.

I read that as: You can disagree with how a mod applies the rules and challenge that. You can't disagree with the rules themselves, the rules are the rules, take it or leave it.

And personally I think complying with NATO export restrictions seems like a good rule.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But I want to win an Internet argument!

[–] jaybone 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago (4 children)

When are we getting them alien tech?

Somebody please leak them.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Someone comes along with a "You primitive earthlings! The ØXÇ-57 Plasma Cannon has a much faster cool down. [Link to schematics]"

[–] glitchdx 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

probably the most compelling evidence that aliens have not visited Earth, if they did then technical documentation would have been leaked on warthunder forums.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Can we get an alien-themed DLC or something just to make sure?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

War thunder UAP expansion when?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

They're all UAPs if you don't know what they are!

"Good thing I'm not a real pilot. My eyesight sucks."

[–] mojofrododojo 8 points 1 month ago

someone posting the tic-tac specs to win a shitpost argument would epic

[–] slazer2au 13 points 1 month ago

No point in leaking that data if you can't go "look, that alien ship is wrong. Here is the technical doc to prove it"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rustyfish 58 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All of this has happened before, and it will happen again.

[–] RizzRustbolt 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's next in the rotation? Helicopters?

[–] topherclay 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] untorquer 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Naval is on the horizon.

Planes will go around again.

[–] topherclay 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Firearms will get a shot after that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

So say we all!

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago

Opsec? What's that?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I always wonder if those leaks lead to wikipedia improvements on the given topics somewhere down the line

[–] Maggoty 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Wiki requires citation. It's pretty easy for a government to have someone go in there and revert it for being uncited.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] slazer2au 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's the current record for days since leak?

[–] copd 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For real?

I know nothing of this game, except I’ve heard at least three instances where this happened and it always makes me chuckle.

[–] pressanykeynow 14 points 1 month ago

There were at least 14 according to Wikipedia.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

For real?

... Checks community name ... Yeah, I'll buy it.

[–] feedum_sneedson 19 points 1 month ago

I met a Eurofighter Typhoon pilot once. Having made the Airfix model as a child, I was suitably impressed.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

And yet in that same timeline Okami 2 has been announced 18 years after the release of the first game so as long France postpone its warning shot until the game release and I can finish it, I'm ok with that ^^

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wonder if War Thunder forums will be one of the things Russia will keep allowing connections to (they're planning to get off the wider 'net), since it's such a treasure trove for classified info on other countries' arsenals.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Disconnecting the country from it doesn't mean their government won't have access...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Simply put: no. It doesn't make any sense.

Russia as a whole will not be cut from the internet. North Korea isn't cut from the internet. The public is. And the public does not need this information

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Geez, again?!

load more comments
view more: next ›