Estiar

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but on people who make poor decisions.

What types of poor decisions? Decisions in faith? Family? Finance? Fitness? From the top level comment of the comment thread I read it as finance as that's the thing related to food in the original post. I read this story as our stewardship of things God gives us. (Everything from the work of our hands to our minds to our relationships to wealth) He who is given much should use them and not keep them hidden away for later

little talent

Talent refers to money in the literal sense (Or more accurately a weight for metals which could be traded as money) It is a large amount of money.

The parable of the wedding feast is about people neglecting their faith and still expecting to be a part of the Kingdom of God. It's not about how much money they have, but instead if they actually practice their faith. If you know the scriptures, but say you'll be righteous later, then you're that person who isn't clothed for the feast. We are called to keep our faith and grow faith in others with the gifts that God gives us.

Supply Side Jesus on the other hand tells us that it's not worth investing our time and resources into people who are poor, and that instead the rich will lead us to have an efficient church. That is fundamentally backwards to Christianity, as it is the poor, the hurt and the suffering who need it the most. There's a reason why some churches put the Beatitudes in their liturgy. But at the same time, this is how our welfare system is run. To get the freeloaders off

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I did, and though we can expect those with a talent to be profitable, what about those with a tenth of one?

Let's put that parable in modern terms. One day a hedge fund manager decided to leave the country for a while to his other home overseas. He went and told His workers to go and be profitable with the money. And so he gave one a million dollars , another 100, 000, and another $50,000.

The one with a million dollars, invested his money and time into making a new business. He managed to turn that $1 million into $2.3 million. The one with 100,000 managed to make $170,000 with shrewd investing. But the man with $50,000 sat on it and didn't do anything. He put it in a savings account and left it there.

The hedge fund manager came back, and saw how successful the other managers were. And he asked the one with 10k "Why didn't you do anything with what I gave you?

The one with the 50 k said "I didn't want to lose any of the money."

The manager rebuked him though because he could have at least taken 1 year bonds and beat interest.

It's a parable about using what God gave you. God gives us gifts to bring in profits. Not in money, as that's not what God really needs, but in faith. You could live for a while with 50k even. But there are people who live paycheck to paycheck who don't have that 1 talent of silver in the first place. They're paid 800 dollars bi-weekly. Rent is 800 dollars. Good luck living with 800 left for everything else. And you still call them lazy

What does Jesus say about people with money? Two things stick out to me. The first one are the Rich donors to the the synagogue, and the poor woman who gives a quarter of her wealth to it. Jesus remarks that the woman gave more than those Rich donors ever will. The other is about a rich man who seeks to enter the kingdom of God and ask Jesus how to do this. Jesus tells him that he must give all his money to the poor. The man was disappointed because he had a lot of wealth.

What boggles my mind as a Christian is that we idolize Rich people and shame poor people. When in fact The most pious people I know, are poor

Prosperity Gospel is a scourge and a poor excuse to claim that God is on the side of the rich.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't blame him. They're all space flight nerds, whether for Boeing or for SpaceX. I'm sure some of the spacex people watched the starliner flight too

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Sure it's possible, but it could just as easily be someone who wants to hack a platform with hundreds of millions of users.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Tomorrow is another launch (Jun 2 at 1203 ET)

Hope we get to see it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

To awaken the spirit of a nation, to feel the will of God, Family and Country. That's pretty woke, though not exactly uhh good

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

I learned something today, and I'm disappointed

[–] [email protected] 103 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

There's a big difference between the two though. Usually in the US, we have transactions in dollars. Whether by credit cards or cash.

With crypto, you have to go to an exchange, and set up payment devices. Then the other person would have to set up that too. Monero trades availability for privacy and sanctions relief

A CBDC wouldn't really compete with Monero. It would compete with things like PayPal where it's still in dollars.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Just that the Chinese never miss an opportunity to hate the Japanese. Especially when the meme brings up the PLA

 

This bill has just passed the US House of Representatives. Why is this important?

Today, we have Visa and Mastercard as our choice of digital payment. Some have floated crypto as an alternate, but crypto is complicated and not backed by an economy or central bank. Others have floated the idea of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) that matches the availability of Mastercard and Visa, but do not go through their services. It could also be used offline with smart devices.

Some critics have cited concerns over privacy, where the central government could collect information, while others have pointed out that Visa and Mastercard collect that sort of data anyways, and CBDCs might log less data if designed differently.

The point may soon become moot if the bill passes the Senate and receive the president's signature

My take on this bill is that it's a ban that should not be put into place. CBDC can still be issued to banks though, just not for you and me. It keeps Credit card companies able to charge high merchant fees.

If I were to write a bill on CBDC, I would put in privacy restrictions into the bill, but still allow for individual CBDC to be issued.

 

Rarity is the fashion pony. She'd do just about anything to be more glamorous. Poor Fluttershy gets betrayed

 

The thing in the middle is Queen Chrysalis. What I would give to be her right now

view more: next ›