this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
156 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3571 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No experience? No problem!

Making the military great again!

Oh we're also cutting veterans benefits!

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombieMantis 5 points 30 minutes ago

Wow, he actually looks like a robber baron.

[–] GreenKnight23 6 points 1 hour ago

"businessman"

if you don't use the quotes it implies that he's actually a businessman.

[–] peopleproblems 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I knew a second Trump administration was going to be a horror show, but I'm pretty sure Putin orchestrated a lot of this in revenge of the US using capitalism to crush the USSR.

He's now using capitalism to crush the US. And he's barely doing anything, he just had to help get a spoon fed capitalist elected and the capitalist would handle the rest.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You'd think after the last term that the idea of running the US as a business should be unpopular. It is decidedly not a business (though it can be used for profit, which is the major problem here).

It's almost like Trump voters had no clue what they were voting for. Or they did, but they had no clue what it meant.

[–] GreenKnight23 4 points 1 hour ago

It's almost like Trump voters had no clue what they were voting for. Or they did, but they had no clue what it meant.

no almost like, it's exactly what it is.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Private Investment firm.

Motherfucker is a VC bro.

Anyone else remember when the Republicans attacked Mitt Romney in the primaries for basically just being a corporate vulture?

Oh well, sure, why not. A venture capitalist for Sec Navy. Not even business experience as a supplier or contractor for the Navy.

So anyway, the US is now about as legitimate a government as Russia, post Soviet collapse.

Third world country with a Gucci belt, nuclear power with a nakedly corrupt oligarchy in charge.

(Yes I know third world has to do with nonaligned during the Cold War, pretend we all know its colloquial usage.)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The collapse of the US empire would be incredibly exciting if I did not live in it

[–] TheLowestStone 3 points 37 minutes ago

This perfectly encapsulates my feelings.

[–] CharlesDarwin 66 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

... a businessman ...

And there it is, again, the deification of the "businessman" - as if that is something that is a qualification.

FFS.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

divided states of plutocrica

[–] Hobbes_Dent 3 points 4 hours ago

Ferengi code of dysfunction.

[–] mojofrododojo 1 points 1 hour ago

wonder how much this post cost.

[–] Sanctus 37 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Trump ruining all branches of government while simultaneously making us vulnerable to Russian Intelligence with these picks.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

All Donny had to do was call the Saudi embassy on Inauguration Day 2017 and politely ask for $50 billion in a Swiss account.

[–] chase_what_matters 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] PedroMaldonado 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So.....all these clown appointments. The guy just wants to wreck it all, right? WTF.

[–] FuglyDuck 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

So the 1% can just buy everything for cents on the dollar like they did during the great depression and great recession

[–] givesomefucks 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

The last eight people who have held the title since 2009 had served either in the Navy, Marine Corps, Army or Coast Guard, according to their Naval History and Heritage Command biographies.

Considering the one from 2009 to 2017 didn't serve in the military that's some weird phrasing...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Mabus

What's crazy is (including "acting" like the article does) we've had 8 Sec Of Navy's in 7 years...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_the_Navy

Just an insane amount of turnover under both Biden and trump.

I hated when Obama did this, at least this time the rest of the Dem party will be pissed too.

Edit:

Mabus sucked, but obviously this guy is gonna suck more. The Navy is ripe for corruption with overseas refueling, I think the Fat Leonard case still has some officers in trial, but it might be finished by now.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Mabus was a Surface Warfare Officer for two years and attained the rank of Lieutenant Junior Grade. Granted, to make JG, all you need to do is have a pulse, but he still was in the Navy.

[–] givesomefucks 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You're right, both that he was and that the requirement for JG is literally a pulse...

It didn't make it to Wikipedia, and barely got takes onto his defense.gov bio, but it is there.

That makes the phrasing even weirder then...

BJ Penn had it for two months in 09, but he had service time.

The guy who had the very beginning of 09 was in freaking DARPA,but if they're counting them, why start at 09 instead of 06?

Like, if we go back 8 of them, we're only in 2017 if we count acting. If we only count permanent then 8 goes back to 2001.

The math just isn't matching for me.

[–] LePoisson 1 points 1 hour ago

Well if it wasn't in his wiki when you posted that, it is now.

[–] actually 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Having a civilian as secretary is not bad, at that level, healthy even. But that requires a type of person who almost certainly would not be in the good graces of Trump. And anyone accepting the position now must fight uphill to prove they are not a mindless, greedy thug filled with evil

[–] LePoisson 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I was skimming more and the actual law is that the secretary has to not have served in the military in the past 7 years. It specifically calls out they're a civilian.

Most of them have had military experience though, it's probably helpful.

[–] actually 2 points 54 minutes ago

I think it’s kind of random in USA history, wikpedia has a list of them and some do

[–] EleventhHour 6 points 4 hours ago

Well, at least we know he’s great at kissing Trump’s ass. Apparently, that’s the only requirement for any job in his cabinet or administration.