this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
422 points (97.5% liked)

Games

16841 readers
1704 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I remember hating the idea, during the age when games came in boxes. Now i support Steam with the tremendous support they've given the Linux platform. Most games i have are games on Steam, but i do have a bunch on GoG, as well as Itch.io. Don't keep all your eggs in one basket, but have to admit the Steam basket is humongous.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

GOG is pretty good but they have zero Linux support that I'm aware of. Had to return a game I bought off there last year. Bought it through Steam and it worked seamlessly.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Some of their games have Linux support but also it seems very much that they do not care about going out of their way for Linux so it gets forgotten about for most titles

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In GOG's defense, they don't have the resources that Steam does but it's still pretty annoying. I have no plans to personally seriously use Windows ever again for personal use but Linux desktop usage is low and not something I'd expect a company that's GOGs size to spend much time on yet. Steam can and does. I respect that a lot.

[–] sep 5 points 6 days ago

Companies can choose to be a part of the solution, or a part of the problem. And i can choose to spend my money on the solution. I would love some redundancy on the linux gaming store front tho, just valve seams a bit fragile. And afaik gog or anyone else can also use proton or???

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

GOG actually has a relatively good selection of Linux games.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Relatively is the key word. I haven't had a serious issue with anything running on Proton and the way Steam implements it. I've had one issue out of one trying to play a game on GOG. Don't get me wrong, I think GOG is great though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thrawne 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I still have a bulk of those CD’s (not the boxes anymore). I keep them in a binder with the CD holder sleeves. Same for my drivers, and operating systems. I have disks of going back to NT, 95b, and 98. I only started in to PC’ in 1998/9. I wish i had my original Voodoo3 driver disk. I remember buying that card in my way back from school one afternoon. I was so excited to install it.

I was skeptical of Steam when it launched as well. It has proven to be a good service.

[–] turmacar 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Beware bit rot.

Granted most of those are going to be archived anyway but I wouldn't count on them being useable indefinately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ByteJunk 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But that's just a happy little accident. Gabe is too much of a good guy, so he actually built a good distribution platform that also pushes for improvements for the whole ecosystem (like the Linux thing).

When he's gone, capitalism dictates that enshitification must ensue in order to squeeze out every single cent of short term profit, and we'll be screwed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

Depends on what happens to the company. Maybe he has children that can inherit his company shares and maybe they don't want it to change.

Maybe they set up a trust or something that can take ownership.

I really hope valve never gets sold.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So are we just going to get an article from every other line in the hl2 documentary?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 days ago

News are slow. The milkman has to do work.

[–] slaacaa 4 points 4 days ago

No, we stop at the second

[–] Sam_Bass 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Guess nobody remembers when Steam first started out and had enough bugs and compatibility issues that they spurred a lot of hatred evinced by the pump icon shoving into and out of a user's butt. Can't seem to find a graphic of it anywhere these days but it was funny back then

[–] Psythik 9 points 5 days ago

Yeah seriously, Steam was universally hated at the time. Anyone else remember this gif?

(Sorry for the imgur link BTW, but Voyager uses the default Android upload dialog and it's AWFUL. Half the time the picture I want to upload isn't there, even if I directly navigate to the folder it's in.)

[–] BigPotato 8 points 5 days ago

I remember Green Steam on dialup. The steam loading bar frolicking across the screen, left AND sometimes right. No "offline" mode. And, of course, being the only way to play Half Life 2.

[–] Blue_Morpho 57 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (17 children)

He's right. Everyone hated the idea of any always online DRM to play the disc you bought in a store. Steam backed off with options for a game to sometimes work offline and a pinky promise to free your games if Gaben died and the new owner decided you own nothing.

It's weird, people hate the current DRM system for games and love Steam. Yet it was Steam that pioneered it. If Steam failed, there's a chance we would still own games instead of them being tied to online DRM verification.

Steam is the benevolent dictator but that's not going to last forever.

[–] ampersandrew 53 points 6 days ago (9 children)

This is revisionist history. Steam was not the origination of DRM or even online DRM.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I remember, buy game. Enter CD key "key already taken" Return game "sorry, box is open we don't take media returns" Rage.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Actually this disc is defective. I'd like to exchange it for a new one."

This trick will be useful if you ever go back to 1999.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, that's what consumers like you are thinking in hindsight and unrelated.

The context Gabe is talking about is when he was approaching publishers. They were just being anti tech and believing in traditional brick and mortar. They were definently pro-DRM. They just couldn't fathom a digital marketplace.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Maybe you weren't old enough to remember it, but people were pissed and swore they would forever boycott Steam when it released

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

I indeed was one of them. Managed to boycott until left4dead2. Then i caved in. The war was lost anyway. And now i have easily put 5 figures into steam and own nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Games used stuff like cd keys and even pieces of paper that deciphered codes as DRM. DRM was always something sought after by companies. Just take a look at Sony rootkit scandal for music CDs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago

steam drm is the bare minimum license check and its not mandatory for anyone to implement in their game

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

Steam is undoubtedly convenient.

But if any game you care about keeping is on GOG, it's a good idea to buy a copy on there, and then squirreling away the offline installer files/extracted game files somewhere safe.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] woelkchen 15 points 5 days ago

Even the launch version of HL1 was a great game but gosh, were Valve a crappy company back then. HL1 shipped with a bunch of trailers, so far, so good. But update patches contained mandatory new trailers. That was dialup era and downloading the updates cost much more money because of those stupid trailers. Then came Steam and made it worse. Imagine the pushback to ads in Windows 10 but add to the annoyance the fact that the annoyances also cost money. Broadband was still just getting started. My family certainly couldn't afford it and they could even less so afford me being online on dialup all the time. So my more wealthy friend passed me CDs with the last non-Steam updates, mods like Counter Strike. Me having been a dumb kid would have ruined my family's livelihood otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I like that even without real competition on the market, they keep on improving and innovating the platform.

It's a company that want's to make money but they way they do it, giving the customers the best most experience possible, wishes me for other companies would take notice of. And i don't only distribution platforms.

[–] Demdaru 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

even without real competition on the market,

Which is the effect of

giving the customers the best most experience possible

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

I mean, if even Steam would have stopped 5 years ago with adding and innovating and just maintaining everything to work smoot, they still would be better than any other platform. Just sit and count money.

Look at epic, I happily claim every week the game they give away, but where is the motivation to even consider them over steam. They had all this time and money to just copy things steam did right or add new things themselves .

Almost nothing happens.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

That's the difference between a private company and a publicly-traded one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

The competition might not be real right now, but they're smart enough to know it'll eventually catch up if they don't stay one step ahead.

[–] trag468 29 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I sent them an angry email when I bought my first house. I had purchased a physical copy of a game because I was waiting for my Internet to get turned on. I wasn't able to play because it required an internet connection to complete the registration. I was so mad. I told them I would never buy another thing from Valve. That turned out to be the lie of the century. I was super wrong and Valve has been a company you can be proud of for decades. I often think about what a jackass I was for sending that email.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you were a jackass. You purchased a physical copy and thus shouldn't need an internet connection to start your game (unless it's multiplayer only). It's crazy how easy it is for people to get used to new normals when it comes to things like this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yup. Valve rocks, but they're not perfect. When I buy a game from Nintendo, I expect it to just work without updates, and they do. I don't understand why other companies get a pass.

This is why I don't but games on release anymore (except Nintendo first party), and why I'm largely okay with PC being digital only. Reward the behavior you want to see.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

So we ended up hiring most of the original Steam team from that other company to build initially this sort of in-game advertising streaming model but then [Steam]

Wow it could have been so much worse

[–] Grimy 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That tracks, everyone still owned their games back then. At least Gaben got his 8 yatchs though.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Remember when you could sell games you'd never play again and people less fortunate than you could have their fun with them for a much lower price?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Yeah, but now at least the games still go on sale for a cheaper price and there isn't a rare game that you can't find anymore and if you do it's $130.

Fun fact: if you want Harvest Moon for snes the game will cost you about $400. Good condition with the box and papers will go over a grand. Snes Aero Fighters is $1,500 for an ok cartridge.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Spiralvortexisalie 6 points 6 days ago

Yeah I am old enough to remember it being just a launcher (ala Ubisoft or EA games) for Half life 2 and a way to counter-strike with no mods. TBH I thought it was gonna fail hard and then after a decade of success, even I was stuck on steam. Also to add originally they only sold valve games as literally no third party was willing to give them a cent and they were short on IP.

load more comments
view more: next ›