ByteJunk

joined 2 years ago
[–] ByteJunk 1 points 12 hours ago

I'm not too sure they'd be such a great fit for the EU, culturally and socially. That sounds like we'd be taking in a Trojan horse.

[–] ByteJunk 6 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

There's Nigel The Cat aka Nigel Original, then Nigel the Human aka Nigel II... There's a Nigel the Dog too? Oh dear...

[–] ByteJunk 4 points 1 day ago

How do Canadian companies like tariffs? Just saying, it's not impossible...

[–] ByteJunk 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm.not saying Canada has to take the offer, just that it's something that should be on the table for trump to chew on.

[–] ByteJunk 18 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I've said this before, the EU should just invite Canada into the Union.

[–] ByteJunk 2 points 1 day ago

People have been known to cross the Florida Straight on makeshift rafts, I hear Cuba is very nice this time of year.

[–] ByteJunk 2 points 1 day ago

Trying to machine parts for a gun with "a bit of electrical know how" sounds like suicide by stupidity to me. Especially if you're going to DIY the ammo as well...

[–] ByteJunk 0 points 2 days ago (21 children)

IP block it. Boom there goes eSNI and DNS.

Sure, it's crude, but again: it doesn't have to perfect, it just needs to create havoc with Google services to push away a regular user, who has no idea what DNS even is.

A better approach though is to fine Google, with a % of revenue increasing until compliance. They'll very quickly be incentivised to comply or shutdown.

[–] ByteJunk 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

See, "I'm not gonna smack you across the face, but I totally could if I wanted to and you can't do shit about it" might not be the best way to clear your reputation as a bully.

[–] ByteJunk 13 points 3 days ago (27 children)

Nah. Demanding the ISPs to block traffic to Google domains would be quite effective.

This isn't like the great firewall of chine where you want to prevent absolutely all traffic. If you make it inconvenient to use, because CSS breaks or a js library doesn't load or images breaslk, its already a huge step into pushing it out of the market.

Enterprise market would be much harder, a loooot of EU companies rely on Google's services, platforms and apps, and migrating away would take a lot of time and money.

[–] ByteJunk 5 points 3 days ago

To be fair, we're halfway through this decade and it's been harder than 90's, 00's and 10's combined.

[–] ByteJunk 6 points 3 days ago

Ok that one wins

 

Hi everyone!

I'm trying to control a "dumb" led light strip segment with an ESP-01S. This is fairly low current, the strip will pull 150mA-200mA max (depends on... artistic? needs).

I have two NPN transistors (2N2222), one to control the 12V supply to the white "channel" and the other the red+blue (don't need the green).

I had to pull-down the gates as I had some flickering, and it works perfectly if I manually connect the GPIOs after the ESP-01S boots.

The ESP will boot if I have the RX pin (GPIO03) pulled down on boot, but not if I pull down any of the others.

I'm not smart enough to come up with a way to have that extra pin I need to be high only during boot, while the gate it's attached to needs to be pulled down...

Any thought, other than getting something with more IO pins?

view more: next ›