this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
128 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2905 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"There are more undocumented people working in Texas right now than there are unemployed people in Texas,"

Hmmmm. How about that.

[–] inclementimmigrant 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's almost like Americans, especially one of a specific skin tone, are tender snowflakes that like to complain about a lack of jerbs while not actually wanting to work.

[–] MushuChupacabra 54 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Shoulda voted Democrat then.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

42% of the state did, not everyone in Texas is a Republican.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Didnt Latino men mostly vote for trump? I don't see a problem, they wanted him in office.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The Latino men who voted for trump are not the undocumented ones

[–] DeadWorldWalking 6 points 2 days ago

And they are too dumb to realize it doesn't matter, they will be denaturalized and put in the same camps

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, these men are pulling up the ladder as they climb.

[–] P1nkman 4 points 2 days ago

It's the American Dream, so why shouldn't they?

Tap for spoiler/s

[–] Brkdncr 39 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Good. We need consequences.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm really sorry for all the people that did try to stop this, and for the people that couldn't fit whatever reason. But the idiots that caused it? I really hope they suffer enough to learn at least a bit.

[–] brucethemoose 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

They will not.

It's like everyone forgot COVID-19. The administration's response and almost daily scandal during that barely moved the political needle, and people are even more siloed in now... I honestly don't know what it would take.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As someone who sat "next" to a child clearly coughing mucus at the movie theater: Yes, everyone forgot about COVID (and masking). Can't wait to be sick in a few days!

[–] brucethemoose 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My sister just got sick as stink visiting family who didn't bother to tell her they were sick! She's coughing up blood!

I know a nurse who's an anti-vaxxer.

...Yeah, I guess pandemic-conscious hygiene is not on people's minds.

[–] EtherWhack 6 points 3 days ago

They need a concept of prejudice that's simplistic (as in singular) in nature with with a tangible body of people or person/s to blame. It would also need to tie into beliefs that they heard or taught while growing up.

Trying to get them to understand (put two and two together) the different facets of a conspiracy or something that is rigged tends to lose them when there is more than one thing at fault.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Hey, Texas construction industry leaders...

☑️ Fucked around

👈 You are here

🔳 Found out

[–] TexasDrunk 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Bullshit. They want those workers scared that they'll be deported because being afraid of that will keep their wages low and keep them compliant. This is good for the larger construction companies who employ those workers.

I'm going to make a prediction. If I'm wrong then I'll admit it. I think they're going to do one wave of very loud deportations, quietly abandon it, and relax the borders briefly to fill the spots that were left by that wave. Just enough to scare the absolute shit out of migrant workers into working, coming home, not putting their kids in school, and not peeking their heads out until it's time to make agriculture and construction companies money.

This is drunk speculation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I don't think you are incorrect. It's not like Trump and such have to prove results, just the perception of results.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait what makes you think the victims placed in emcampments will stop working?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Then they'll get to 1) be paid nothing instead of a few dollars an hour, 2) be a drain on the taxpayer from funding+running the new immigrant labor camps, 3) get abused by camp staffers, and 4) still pick your crops

[–] GladiusB 4 points 2 days ago

It does them absolutely no good to deport people. It's who do the shit jobs for low wages without healthcare. They are absolutely trying to keep people on edge.

[–] Chainweasel 1 points 3 days ago

Schadenfreude

[–] cabron_offsets 1 points 3 days ago

Sorry bruh, get fukt.