this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
404 points (99.3% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

3390 readers
329 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blue_Morpho 129 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Trump's last attorney general was the son of a paedophile who was Epstein's mentor and gave him his career start.

A paedo Attorney General is part of Trump's brand.

[–] FlyingSquid 101 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Trump himself is a pedophile. Which a lot of them know full well and just dismissed as irrelevant because it's Trump.

What are those phrases? Like follows like and birds of a feather flock together?

[–] teft 28 points 2 days ago

Birds of a shit feather flock together, Randy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

Personally I like "Shit tends to clump together."

And "the turd doesn't fall far from the asshole"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK 17 points 2 days ago

Didn’t know that about Barr’s dad. Gross.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] elbucho 68 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, don't worry. I'm sure they'll fall in line in a couple of days and act like Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

[–] FlyingSquid 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's funny you put it that way. People are saying Trump will start WWIII and I think you're closer to the truth. He and Putin and Xi will all stay out of each other's way and maybe occasionally fight a proxy war here and there to maintain power in perpetuity.

Why go to war with each other when you can just leave each other alone and let everyone else do the fighting?

Besides, Trump is beholden to Putin and Putin and Xi are buddies (Putin might even be beholden to Xi at this point considering Russia's money issues). Who is going to go to war with who?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stalin and Hitler tried what you suggested...

[–] FlyingSquid 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Their pact was more about having mutual levels of power though. Putin clearly has power over Trump and it sure looks like Xi has power over Putin.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago

The infighting is the point.
The dear leader is most threatened by his closest advisors, ministers and generals.
They are in a powerful enough position to topple him.
So it's crucial that they constantly fight each other.

[–] hogmomma 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

The poor, poor people on Lemmy having to suffer more Reddit content on Lemmy.

[–] someguy3 31 points 2 days ago

It's like how we screenshot 4 chan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AdrianTheFrog 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m just really hoping Trump will piss off republicans in Congress fast enough that they stop supporting him before he can cause any real harm.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I too hope they waste the next few years with factional infighting. The senate Republicans have already gone against his personal pick for majority leader and picked a boring neocon.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A standstill is probably the best you could hope for right now, but not exactly a positive outcome.

[–] Anticorp 15 points 2 days ago

There's zero chance of a positive outcome. The best we can hope for is the least destructive outcome.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ideally, they shit the bed badly while somehow not doing too much damage, and the Democrats take both houses in a landslide in 2026.

Delusional hopium I know, but hey, you never know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EndOfLine 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Former President Trump said the “biggest mistake” of his presidency was picking “bad, disloyal people” to join his administration.

(source)

It boggles the mind that anybody would be expecting Trump to consider anything but loyalty for his appointments.

I imagine the conversations going a bit like "You are going to be part of my cabinet. I'm told it's not the type of cabinet you put things in, but a group of people that make decisions and handle all the boring stuff. My cabinet is going to be the best most beautiful cabinet anyone has ever seen. Here's the hat with available positions. Let's see what you get."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass 20 points 2 days ago

Trump is trying to legitimize pedophilia. He doesn't want to be the only one guilty of it in his circle

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago
[–] CMLVI 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How long until he gets replaced and Trump releases the info to burn the bridge entirely and install an even worse person?

[–] FlyingSquid 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think it's slightly different than what you're suggesting. I'm thinking he's picking the worst people he can pick for these jobs so they get denied and his next pick, which is almost as bad, gets approved instead.

Either way, he mostly gets what he wants... and if whatever attorney general finally does get approved ends up fucking up, which they will, Trump can say, "not my fault, I nominated Gaetz."

[–] Ciderpunk 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you’re assigning a level of intelligence that Trump simply doesn’t have here. He’s absolutely not planning for anything more than 10 seconds ahead. He’s got a list of people he knows will do anything he says and he’s installing them wherever with no rhyme or reason.

[–] FlyingSquid 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sorry, I'm not trying to suggest this plan was come up with by Trump himself. It would be the people behind him.

[–] gdog05 14 points 2 days ago

Does seem like a Roger Stone tactic.

[–] elbucho 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hard disagree on this. This has Trump's stench all over it. Every person being tapped for these positions is a Trump sycophant, and none of them are even remotely qualified to do the job he's trying to assign them.

I agree that Trump is not good at planning, well, anything. But none of this feels like a plan. It's all: "I like PersonX. I will hire them." If it feels like a very stupid, short-sighted, and childish thing, it's because Trump is a stupid, short-sighted child.

There is no plan for what happens if Gaetz doesn't get confirmed, just like there was no plan informing his selection of Gaetz. If Gaetz doesn't get confirmed, Trump will make a few all-caps posts on Truth Social, and then nominate another sycophant. He's got so many to choose from these days.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Trump has always been a puppet.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

I think that's probably giving him too much credit. He's not really a democratic politician, he's a fascist.

My bet is that he is constructing a loyalty test to weed out opposition within the ranks. Anyone who doesn't fully give into the cult of personality gets put on a list of people he can't trust.

He doesn't really care about gaetz, but gaetz has pissed off enough people within the party to act as a good tool to test the waters of his own party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Never, until he doesn’t obey Trump.

Gaetz was reportedly two days away from the House Ethics Committee releasing its report on his… activities with minors - which was going to be damning. Gaetz instead quits congress to nullify their jurisdiction, and Trump gets easy blackmail over his new AG.

Obviously having a crony run the Justice Department kills all of Trumps investigations, but it also lets him steer the department as he pleases.

[–] fox2263 13 points 2 days ago

Trump is training Gaetz up to become the next Epstein

Pass it on

[–] DirkMcCallahan 20 points 2 days ago

Extremely stable geniuses.

[–] stoly 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are very brave to go over there...

[–] FlyingSquid 12 points 2 days ago

To be fair, I got this from elsewhere. I am not that brave.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

These were the same people who swore in January that they wouldn't vote if DeSantis didn't get the nomination, and who cringed to death when Trump sold NFTs

[–] ramenshaman 11 points 2 days ago

Looks like they're finally starting to find out.

[–] cm0002 13 points 2 days ago

Just as a reminder, there are (unfortunately) a few conservative communities here as well at [email protected] and [email protected] and also [email protected]

But please don't use my links to downvote things there or tag the users posting right wing crap there as Right-wing Nutjobs or anything like that

[–] x00z 7 points 2 days ago

Truly "me and the boys" type of picks

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK 9 points 2 days ago

How could they possibly know that Donnie favors sycophancy over aptitude?!?

[–] Anticorp 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can think of a lot of worse picks.

[–] Furbag 7 points 2 days ago

Yeah, for real. These guys lack imagination if Matt Gaetz for AG is the "worst possible" pick for AG.

How about AG Barack Obama?

How about AG George Soros?

How about AG Vermin Supreme?

Trump is real fucking stupid, but he's smart enough to pick someone who isn't going to be good at the job of prosecuting criminals considering he is one. His one criteria for this position is loyalty and Gaetz seems to have that going for him. Doesn't matter in the end of he's ineffective because Trump doesn't have an interest in actually governing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I perceive this as a loyalty test. Trump will see who opposes Gaetz and put them on his enemies list. Then he'll eliminate them to "drain the swamp. "

[–] Anticorp 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Our loyalty is due entirely to the United States. It is due to the President only and exactly to the degree in which he efficiently serves the United States. It is our duty to support him when he serves the United States well. It is our duty to oppose him when he serves it badly.

--Teddy Roosevelt

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

That's how it should work, but anyone expecting that from the Trump administration and his subservient partisans is delusional.

load more comments
view more: next ›