Ciderpunk

joined 2 years ago
[–] Ciderpunk 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I remember when big phones used to be called “phablets” and that was considered a bad thing that only certain power user types would want…

And then the same marketing that hit cars came to phones when companies realized that “bigger than the last model” was an easy way to have a number that they could point to that got bigger to imply this one was somehow better. That and human brains are wired to like bright colors so store displays of PHONE WITH BIG BRIGHT COLOR SCREEN made people want it despite it being objectively less easy to use than a more reasonably sized device.

-Sent from my iPhone 13 mini

[–] Ciderpunk 10 points 1 week ago

the fart of the deal baybee

[–] Ciderpunk 2 points 2 weeks ago

Love that the media continues to frame these events as “giving into public pressure” and not just doing what they’ve always wanted to do but didn’t feel comfortable doing.

[–] Ciderpunk 25 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Remember when Dan Quayle of all people convinced Mike Pence to not go along with Trumps plan to not certify the 2020 election? Wild times.

[–] Ciderpunk 88 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Didn’t we already know this? I remember this being a thing during trumps first term and him doing absolutely nothing because he would’ve had to admit Russia did a bad thing which he’s mysteriously incapable of doing for reasons beyond anyone’s comprehension…

[–] Ciderpunk 21 points 1 month ago

I know nothing you’re asking is in good faith but…

There’s a difference between your doctor being a little blunt about how you have cancer and aren’t going to live much longer and your doctor telling you that immigrants caused your cancer and his perfect tariffs are gonna cause healing like you’ve never seen and everyone will come up to him with tears in their eyes and tell him “sir, no one thought you could cure cancer with tariffs but you did it.”

Trump is the second one, in case you couldn’t tell.

[–] Ciderpunk 1 points 1 month ago

“You don’t need to be protected from us” he said while invading.

Yeah, again, not a winning argument here.

[–] Ciderpunk -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still hinging literally everything on Donbas not being externally caused I see. As long as you cover up interference in other countries, it’s fine to use that as pretext to invade and do whatever you want.

[–] Ciderpunk 9 points 1 month ago

I mean, we agree, Russia intends to exploit Ukraine’s natural gas reserves in the regions they are occupying, which definitely meets the definition you set out so…

Unless you’re insisting that Russia is going to just give that territory up after all this, despite them claiming they have a hereditary right to it all, because they just really wouldn’t want to accidentally profit off taking over their neighbors territory in which case, it sounds like the “flat earth level analysis” is coming from inside the house.

[–] Ciderpunk 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’m not sure what the point of this considering that I am specifically calling you out for refusing to admit Russia is doing an imperialism and your deflection is to say that Japan did an imperialism. Is that supposed to make Russia all clear to do an imperialism?

[–] Ciderpunk 2 points 1 month ago

Shocking that you’ve once again decided to ignore the important part and are focusing on anything but acknowledging that maybe Russia has something to do with the situation.

view more: next ›