this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
119 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
4021 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nothing at all to worry about that Trump's nearly highest priority is to install loyal leadership at the military. Nope, nothing concerning about that. Everything is fine.

[–] militaryintelligence 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sure Trump has America's best interests in mind, let's just forget about it and take a nap

[–] IphtashuFitz 1 points 1 week ago

Any idea where I can get som extra strength Hibernol?

[–] Rapidcreek 41 points 1 week ago

A national security disaster waiting to happen.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

And to make this even more ridiculous than it already is, they're calling this board the "warrior board".

If Donald Trump approves the order, it could fast-track the removal of generals and admirals found to be “lacking in requisite leadership qualities,” ... But it could also create a chilling effect on top military officers, given the president-elect’s past vow to fire “woke generals,” referring to officers seen as promoting diversity in the ranks at the expense of military readiness.

As commander in chief, Trump can fire any officer at will, but an outside board whose members he appoints would bypass the Pentagon’s regular promotion system, signaling across the military that he intends to purge a number of generals and admirals.

...

But some former officials believe the potential Trump administration is looking to politicize the military. “Do they start wearing MAGA hats in formation to signal who’s where?” asked one former senior Pentagon official. “The potential for this to go wrong is infinite.

Emphases mine.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

he's already outsourced executive branch and parts of judicial and legislative; so why not outsource our military leadership to russia, too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This always ends in a yes-men military filled with unskilled ass-kissers.

People will optimize for the grading system.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Interestingly, the damage done to the US military this way by itself makes all of Russia's investments in Trump worthwhile. Incredible bang for the buck - far more than they'd get investing in their own military.

[–] MapleEngineer 2 points 1 week ago

This is one of two ways that it can end.

The other is that the military says, "No".

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 4 points 1 week ago

Nazis play opposite day to confuse everybody.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey everyone who didn’t vote! Thanks!

[–] ripcord 8 points 1 week ago

But Palestine or some bullshit

[–] Kyrgizion 23 points 1 week ago

Never thought I'd see the end of US military hegemony in my lifetime. But this makes it that much more likely.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

Ahh so looking for new ones that would turn around and go after US citizens in the US, yes?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

It will tale generations to undo all the dammage he has told everyone that he will cause to the US.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The last shred of hope I have is that all the people that are being picked for various federal roles are so incompetent that they can't even crime properly.

[–] jrs100000 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Thats the hope. Trump gets side tracked chasing the news cycle and golfing while his incompetent lackeys smear shit on the walls. A couple years later he chokes on a hamberder, Vance pushes through some last minute tax breaks to pay off his backers and leaves office in 2028.

[–] horse_battery_staple 2 points 1 week ago

This would just setup Vance for eternal president though. He doesn't walk away from that.

[–] mick 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably irrelevant because they won’t get prosecuted anyway.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course not. I mean to say that I hope they're too incompetent to reach their criminal goals.

[–] mick 3 points 1 week ago

Ah. I misinterpreted your comment.

[–] shalafi 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, give that hope up. That was what he did first go round. They're been plotting for 4+ years on how to do it right this time.

Steve Bannon was just talking about door-to-door thugs to enforce illegal removal. They're already plotting concentration camps on the border.

They have their shit together this time. Remember Hitler's failed Beer Hall Putsch? Same deal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago
[–] foggy 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Listen, guys. It's bad. Yes.

Please if you're freaking out, watch this.

If you don't know this guy, he's an OG Security guy, very frequent speaker at Black Hat and DEF CON. Brilliant guy in many ways.

The tl;dw:

Government is a lumbering giant that is as hard to change negatively as it is to change positively. That's not to say things are a-okay. They're not. But there are solutions to every problem, and historically, love wins.

[–] Eldritch 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you go through the proper channels? Absolutely. If you have babysitters watching him and putting restrictions on what he can do like his last term? Absolutely. When his administration's babysitters called him out and left the field. Telling people not to elect him again. And now he's just surrounding himself with Craven yes men. And is going to go outside of normal procedure. To put more Yes Men in place. You can't count on the lumbering giant anymore.

[–] Sanctus 7 points 1 week ago

Hey, I've seen this before!

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 5 points 1 week ago

Ah, the fascist purge begins.

Up next should be jailing opponents of some sort.

[–] Skyrmir 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kind of curious where he gets the funding for that board.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Skyrmir 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's rich, not a branch of government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] MapleEngineer 1 points 1 week ago

Up next, generals create board to purge Trump.