this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
1107 points (97.3% liked)

Science Memes

11111 readers
1955 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1107
Clever, clever (mander.xyz)
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
185 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 169 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

actually not too dumb lol

[–] BanjoShepard 112 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think most students are copying/pasting instructions to GPT, not uploading documents.

[–] Khanzarate 159 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Right, but the whitespace between instructions wasn't whitespace at all but white text on white background instructions to poison the copy-paste.

Also the people who are using chatGPT to write the whole paper are probably not double-checking the pasted prompt. Some will, sure, but this isnt supposed to find all of them its supposed to catch some with a basically-0% false positive rate.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah knocking out 99% of cheaters honestly is a pretty good strategy.

And for students, if you're reading through the prompt that carefully to see if it was poisoned, why not just put that same effort into actually doing the assignment?

[–] Windex007 94 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point, so forgive me, but I expect carefully reading the prompt is still orders of magnitude less effort than actually writing a paper?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Eh, putting more than minimal effort into cheating seems to defeat the point to me. Even if it takes 10x less time, you wasted 1x or that to get one passing grade, for one assignment that you'll probably need for a test later anyway. Just spend the time and so the assignment.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Or if they don't bother to read the instructions they uploaded

[–] Ledivin 21 points 3 weeks ago

Just put it in the middle and I bet 90% of then would miss it anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

yes but copy paste includes the hidden part if it’s placed in a strategic location

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 148 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Just takes one student with a screen reader to get screwed over lol

[–] [email protected] 103 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

A human would likely ask the professor who is Frankie Hawkes.. later in the post they reveal Hawkes is a dog. GPT just hallucinate something up to match the criteria.

[–] Crashumbc 33 points 3 weeks ago

The students smart enough to do that, are also probably doing their own work or are learning enough to cross check chatgpt at least..

There's a fair number that just copy paste without even proof reading...

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BatmanAoD 17 points 3 weeks ago

Presumably the teacher knows which students would need that, and accounts for it.

[–] [email protected] 145 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

I like to royally fuck with chatGPT. Here's my latest, to see exactly where it draws the line lol:

https://chatgpt.com/share/671d5d80-6034-8005-86bc-a4b50c74a34b

TL;DR: your internet connection isn't as fast as you think

[–] [email protected] 121 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the hiway.

[–] FuglyDuck 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Ages ago, there was a time where my dad would mail back up tapes for offsite storage because their databases were large enough that it was faster to put it through snail mail.

It should also be noted his databases were huge, (they’d be bundled into 70 pound packages and shipped certified.)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I like to manipulate dallee a lot by making fantastical reasons why I need edgy images.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I wish more teachers and academics would do this, because I"m seeing too many cases of "That one student I pegged as not so bright because my class is in the morning and they're a night person, has just turned in competent work. They've gotta be using ChatGPT, time to report them for plagurism. So glad that we expell more cheaters than ever!" and similar stories.

Even heard of a guy who proved he wasn't cheating, but was still reported anyway simply because the teacher didn't want to look "foolish" for making the accusation in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Something I saw from the link someone provided to the thread, that seemed like a good point to bring up, is that any student using a screen reader, like someone visually impaired, might get caught up in that as well. Or for that matter, any student that happens to highlight the instructions, sees the hidden text, and doesnt realize why they are hidden and just thinks its some kind of mistake or something. Though I guess those students might appear slightly different if this person has no relevant papers to actually cite, and they go to the professor asking about it.

[–] Ledivin 22 points 3 weeks ago

They would quickly learn that this person doesn't exist (I think it's the professor's dog?), and ask the prof about it.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

Easily by thwarted by simply proofreading your shit before you submit it

[–] yamanii 77 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are professional cheaters and there are lazy ones, this is gonna get the lazy ones.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago

I wouldn't call "professional cheaters" to the students that carefully proofread the output. People using chatgpt and proofreading content and bibliography later are using it as a tool, like any other (Wikipedia, related papers...), so they are not cheating. This hack is intended for the real cheaters, the ones that feed chatgpt with the assignment and return whatever hallucination it gives to you without checking anything else.

[–] xantoxis 72 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Is it? If ChatGPT wrote your paper, why would citations of the work of Frankie Hawkes raise any red flags unless you happened to see this specific tweet? You'd just see ChatGPT filled in some research by someone you hadn't heard of. Whatever, turn it in. Proofreading anything you turn in is obviously a good idea, but it's not going to reveal that you fell into a trap here.

If you went so far as to learn who Frankie Hawkes is supposed to be, you'd probably find out he's irrelevant to this course of study and doesn't have any citeable works on the subject. But then, if you were doing that work, you aren't using ChatGPT in the first place. And that goes well beyond "proofreading".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago

But that's fine than. That shows that you at least know enough about the topic to realise that those topics should not belong there. Otherwise you could proofread and see nothing wrong with the references

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 weeks ago (32 children)

My college workflow was to copy the prompt and then "paste without formatting" in Word and leave that copy of the prompt at the top while I worked, I would absolutely have fallen for this. :P

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Who is Frankie Hawkes?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 3 weeks ago

For those that didn't see the rest of this tweet, Frankie Hawkes is in fact a dog. A pretty cute dog, for what it's worth.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Is it invisible to accessibility options as well? Like if I need a computer to tell me what the assignment is, will it tell me to do the thing that will make you think I cheated?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Disability accomodation requests are sent to the professor at the beginning of each semester so he would know which students use accessibility tools

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 weeks ago

Btw, this is an old trick to cheat the automated CV processing, which doesn't work anymore in most cases.

[–] Etterra 51 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Ah yes, pollute the prompt. Nice. Reminds me of how artists are starting to embed data and metadata in their pieces that fuck up AI training data.

[–] lepinkainen 29 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And all maps have fake streets in them so you can tell when someone copied it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] lettruthout 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Frankie Hawkes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] archiduc 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wouldn’t the hidden text appear when highlighted to copy though? And then also appear when you paste in ChatGPT because it removes formatting?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›