Sal

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I adore the odor of those flowers ๐Ÿ˜Œ

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

That's an error I had not seen before, but I also just encountered with this specific post. I will investigate, thanks.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

This error is a rate limit from the object storage provider. I did not know of this limit when I chose them, and I still have not found a way to change the limit. I will send them an e-mail. If the limit can't be increased, one option is to pick another object storage provider, but the migration takes days.

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Check in your settings whether you have disabled the visibility of bot responses. This can happen if bots replied to you and your settings are set to not see them.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Ah - does the exit node participate at all when accessing a .onion? Or is it skipped altogether?

And the HTTP header thing is very cool, I did not know about that!

I have added the header to the site and it works!

I just added the following line to the location / {} block in the https server section:

add_header Onion-Location http://mandermybrewn3sll4kptj2ubeyuiujz6felbaanzj3ympcrlykfs2id.onion/$request_uri;

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In the context of tor, a domain block would apply - for example - if the exit node's ISP blocks the domain. But if the local network implements domain blocks, this would not affect the tor browser - is this correct? Or is it also possible to block domains locally even for tor browser users?

 

When a website can be accessed via a clearnet and a .onion url, is there a benefit to making use of the .onion url?


Context:

I am considering pointing a ".onion" url to my instance (mander.xyz).

I did some tests with and it seems like mlmym works well with JavaScript disabled. Since JavaScript is often disabled in the tor browser, I could make the .onion url point at that front-end instead.

This would be fun to do, but I wonder if there is a practical benefit to the ".onion" url as opposed to simply accessing the clearnet url via the tor browser.

EDIT: I went ahead and created an onion URL to try out, but I would still like to know if there is an actual advantage to .onion urls:

http://mandermybrewn3sll4kptj2ubeyuiujz6felbaanzj3ympcrlykfs2id.onion/

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank you for being alert! I have banned them instance-wide now.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ahh, wish I could join you! But I am travelling these days. Enjoy Canvassing!

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Inderdaad, ik ben ook voor die marketing gevallen.

Denk je dat mmWave binnenkort beschikbaar zal zijn? Op dit moment heb ik een sub-6 GHz 5G-router voor internet thuis. Ik ben benieuwd hoe een mmWave-router zou presteren als er een zendmast in de buurt is.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Appointed! Sorry about the hassle. I also learned about these federated community bugs just now.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This work using high-throughput combinatorial chemistry to find molecules to stop/revert aging is amazing. I have been looking it in the past few days. The authors screened 653,000 different compounds, I am very curious about how expensive this screening was.

I was not aware of DePinho but I am familiar with Schultz's work. I thought that would get a Nobel prize for his work on non-canonical amino acids, but he hasn't yet. I am now placing my bets, Ronald DePinho and Peter G. Schultz will win a Nobel prize.

view more: next โ€บ