this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
329 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19890 readers
4771 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 106 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m hoping he never gets the chance. If he does, I hope he fails to get rid of Smith again.

[–] Atom 84 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He's been talking about sending the military after Adam Schiff and other "enemies within". He definitely heard the SCOTUS arguments. If he's president and he doesn't get to fire someone, or everyone, I doubt he'll hesitate to send a military unit to threaten or even kill them. Who's going to stop him? Would 15-17 senators vote to impeach him? Would he try to kill them too? Did Tuberville's General Promotion sabotage leave enough slots open for Trump to install his own "Hitler's generals"?

I would say I'm being alarmist, but the man is on TV saying this is what he will do on day 1. If he wins, everyone, left and right, is fucked.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fascinating, isn't it?

"On day one, I will take a giant greasy shit in all your mouths."

"Did you hear WTF he just said?"

"You're just being alarmist, what he actually meant was..."

It's like...people want things to be normal, they beg for it, they lie to themselves...but shit is NOT normal right now.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 7 points 3 months ago

Wonder why all the talking heads and GOP members get the inside scoop on what he's really thinking but the rest of us just get to assume he's saying something other than what he really means to say... but also he's giving it to us straight... but talks in hyperbole... but totally not lying. 😵‍💫

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Idk man. It's been 10 years since this meme of a presidential candidate went too far. This might be normal now.

[–] PwnTra1n 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)

how can anyone even be surprised by this. trump will likely get into power and say "give me a list of democrats i can fire" and he will fire them plus some democrats he cant as well as "disloyal" republicans

[–] PunnyName 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's part of Project 2025

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Yep, a root and branch routing of anyone who won't pledge their allegiance to Trump above all else.

[–] Ghostalmedia 14 points 3 months ago

They already have the list.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago

Seems like a power that the president shouldn't have. Just like pardoning themselves.

[–] CharlesDarwin 31 points 3 months ago

Gosh, now why would he do that? I thought he was perfectly innocent?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do not let the diaper filled Nazi anywhere near office.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This makes it sound like he's eating the dirty diapers, which given how morally bankrupt and gross he is in general... Would not surprise me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

People are saying it. Many people are saying it. Diaper Eater Donnie they call him, many very powerful people say so. The best people.

[–] peopleproblems 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Regardless if he takes office or not, I fully expect political violence. That is what this rhetoric leads to.

I suspect it won't be nearly as bad and nearly as pervasive if Harris takes office. But it will still happen. That's what happens when you have idiots being enflamed by this sort of rhetoric. They see a jihad. That's the endgame of ultraconservativism. Blind adherence to the authority. Be it a person, or an imaginary entity.

I have a son I need to protect. I have friends to protect. I don't know what will happen, but we can't pretend this will all be ok.

[–] Riccosuave 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I am certainly not pretending everything is going to be okay. I am also of the opinion that violence is the only political action that ever truly solves anything, for better or for worse. Conservatives have a pretty large monopoly on violence in this country, and that problem is becoming self-evident to anybody that is paying attention.

Until the left is willing to fight back, or present a violent opposition to the erosion of our rights when necessary we are just slow walking to the forgone conclusion that our democracy has already fallen because there is nobody here that is willing to defend it on our own soil regardless of the cost.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

Well yeah. It threatens the only thing he cares about - himself.

[–] morphballganon 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the threat of a Trump presidency is confirmed by the electoral college, then President Biden will have no choice but to perform an Executive Act to preserve democracy.

[–] Scolding7300 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Anything. The supreme Court said so.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Order the public executions of Trump and Vance as fascist threats to democracy, transfer the presidency to the Speaker on January 6th.

Sounds like a reasonable compromise to me, centrists love those, right?

[–] Boddhisatva 6 points 3 months ago

Public? No, I don't see the need for a public execution. That's too MAGA for me. However, you know how the conservative members of SCOTUS stick little hints in their rulings and dissents to give ideas to red state AGs? Justice Sonia Sotomayor dropped such a hint for Biden in her dissent on on the executive privilege case.

In her dissent to Monday’s Supreme Court ruling, Justice Sonia Sotomayor painted a grim portrait of a commander-in-chief now “immune, immune, immune” from criminal liability and free to exploit official presidential power against political opponents.

“Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival?” she wrote. “Immune.”

It's subtle, but I think I see what she's getting at.

[–] JustZ 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Arbiter 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Poor thing needs some water.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

The red kind.

[–] RampantParanoia2365 13 points 3 months ago

Pikachu says "Duh."

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 3 months ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/trump-fire-special-counsel-jack-smith-b0d3d24286fbe0c461a901a33ec78d62
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support