this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
468 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2868 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Georgia town hall, where Trump took questions on reproductive laws, transgender rights and other issues, aired Wednesday morning. But Fox News did not disclose that the female audience it selected for the event was packed with local Republican supporters and the network edited its broadcast to remove some of their vocal advocacy of Trump.

The Georgia Federation of Republican Women wrote on its Facebook page Wednesday that the group helped host the event, posting photos from the venue and writing they were “Super excited for the opportunity of hosting this event right here in Georgia!”

Shortly after CNN reached out to the group and Fox News about their role, the post was edited to state they were “excited for the opportunity of attending this event right here in Georgia!”

. . . The first question posed to Trump at the town hall came from a woman identified as Lisa, who asked the former president a question about the economy. The network did not disclose that Lisa is also the president of the Fulton County Republican Women group.

. . . “I want to thank you for coming to a room full of women the current administration would consider domestic terrorists,” a woman named Alicia said to laughter from the audience before a question about foreign policy.

But a portion of Alicia’s question was edited by Fox News to remove her admission that she was voting for Trump.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lexam 178 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I just assumed it was his supporters.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Yup, I think everyone outside of Fox News knew it was just a thinly-veiled Trump rally, but Fox's editing out comments from the audience members that they already were Trump supporters is the really damning part. Fox News knew it was supposed to look neutral and that is an admission that they were trying to hide it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In case you didn't already know that Fox News is just a propaganda arm of the GOP.

[–] TheLowestStone 9 points 2 months ago

It's propatainment.

[–] Blum0108 2 points 2 months ago

Next you'll tell me that water is wet.

[–] Nightwingdragon 7 points 2 months ago

Fox News knew it was supposed to look neutral and that is an admission that they were trying to hide it.

Fox (a) hasn't been trying to hide their support for Trump for years, and (b) is not even considered legally news, by their own admission. It's "entertainment". And they get away with being so heavily biased by basically saying that they're heavily biased in order to entertain an audience that just happens to lean heavily to the right.

At least they got actual women. Half of me was expecting the people asking the questions to be Trump family members wearing bad wigs and fake noses.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 1 points 2 months ago

Meh, this broadcast isn't to turn anyone onto trump but provide cover for the bigots that are, "undecided." If they see there is no social condemnation for voting for trump they will happily show up to the polls. They will also flip their shit if anyone dares call them out having been thoroughly duped.

[–] tpihkal 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't see why this is news.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Journalistic ethics means disclosing this sort of thing. It probably is good to point out, just so that norms don't get completely forgotten, but, yeah, this shouldn't surprise anyone.

[–] Diplomjodler3 38 points 2 months ago

Lying weasels doing lying weasel things. Actually, comparing these disgusting pieces of human excrement to weasels is an insult to weasels.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The fact that so many women support him is disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I’ve seen black people supporting him, immigrants supporting him, … people got the brain rot these days. And fucking Biden still hasn’t plugged the hole that gives presidents unlimited powers! Fuck that. Either use it to clean the Supreme Court or gut it before the election is over.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Well, of course they would. If they didn't, their husbands would beat them.

[–] mycodesucks 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Onion needs another one of those repeating articles for FOX News.

"Shitty network masquerading as a news organization does shitty partisan thing"

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt 2 points 2 months ago

"Shitty propaganda channel masquerading as a news organization continues spreading blatant lies that anyone who pays attention could disprove in 12 seconds"

[–] acosmichippo 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

why would anyone else subject themselves to an hour of trump nonsense?

[–] Makeitstop 7 points 2 months ago

Because they can't find him on a golf course anymore?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm just surprised they could find enough women willing to be in the same room with him.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are a lot of self hating women out there, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That's true but it's not so simple. Let's assume many of those women are racist and sexist and xenophobic. How do they choose which candidate to vote for?

One would hope that the answer to that question begins with becoming a less s***** human being, but if you assume that they're not going to make improvements in their own moral character, at least not in the short run, then they have this weird choice to make.

[–] cultsuperstar 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Duh? Of course they're going to stack the audience with his supporters.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You know that and we know that but guess who doesn’t know that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Basically all of Fox's viewer base, except for the small percentage that just hate-watch them.

[–] maniajack 1 points 2 months ago

That Bloomberg news interview probably did the same thing, I couldn't believe some of the garbage parts of the crowd were clapping at.

[–] reddig33 15 points 2 months ago

Fox “news”.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah... I'm still fucking pissed about it, but I knew they were going to pull this bullshit...

Where's the BiAsEd MeDiA complaints now Magoos? Oh that's right, you never actually gave a shit, you just want to "win" at all costs.

[–] Nightwingdragon 3 points 2 months ago

It's projection. Just like everything else Trump says.

He doesn't want "unbiased media", and neither do his supporters. They want a media that's heavily biased towards them. And to a degree, his tactics work. Either out of fear of losing access to Trump, fear he'll post a mean tweet, or just a desire to "appear" unbiased, they will withhold criticism, throw him softball questions, edit unflattering footage, and give his word salads credibility by treating them as if they're serious issues that should be discussed. So in that way, he gets the coverage he wants.

[–] partial_accumen 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So it was a Potemkin village of a Town Hall event then?

[–] homesweethomeMrL 2 points 2 months ago

Yup. With a lotta flags.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I thought they would just kidnap enough women off the street to fill the audience.

[–] Bonesince1997 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The alternative facts crowd

[–] homesweethomeMrL 8 points 2 months ago

They’re still mad about the Bowling Green Massacre

[–] cheese_greater 4 points 2 months ago
[–] Rapidcreek 0 points 2 months ago

At least CNN is reporting it. Although I now feel he’s got it in the bag. He’s the father of IVF for godsake