this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
539 points (98.0% liked)

196

16714 readers
3270 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 211 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I appreciate the transparency tbh. Would be better if things were different but it is what it is for now.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 2 months ago

For context, Steam is now forced to display this due to a new law passed in California: https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/26/24254922/california-digital-purchase-disclosure-law-ab-2426

Valve is not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts.

[–] [email protected] 121 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Its pretty much up to the developer. You can have no DRM and not even require steam to be open, or you can make your game unplayable.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Imo Steam should tell people whether or not a game actually requires Steam (or another form of DRM) to run. I know they already do it for things like Denuvo, but they should also note if the game actually uses Steam as DRM or if the game can be launched without it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Yeah that would be nice.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

PCGamingWiki has that info for most titles I believe. It would be nice to see it in Steam though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Afaik, Steam only sells licences.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Steam sells DRM-free games too, you can download them and then uninstall Steam and they will work. In this case though, on top of purchasing the game, you are buying a license to download updates for it through Steam. It's a developer decision.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

DRM is orthagonal to ownership

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

I do not disagree?

[–] CobblerScholar 86 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This was always the case, just stated explicitly now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuperIce 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did California's new law requiring this already go into effect?

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 months ago

January 1 2025, guess Steam preferred not waiting in this case

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is also the case for physical copies, and has been since software was first sold

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

According to media lawyers, maybe. But when I have a CD of music, or a game cartridge, I can sell it to someone else. For money. Because it's my copy I'm selling. So, what the fuck are you talking about except ceding the point to corporate lawyers for no good reason?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Yeah, if a game needs online activation it doesn't matter which medium you buy...

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago (5 children)

If buying isn't owning then piracy isn't stealing.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Bad argument piracy has never been stealing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

If buying becomes owning, will people stop pirating?

[–] Opisek 13 points 2 months ago

People were more inclined to buy software when it was a one time purchase rather than a license subscription (for example Adobe).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JayObey711 27 points 2 months ago

it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing it's not stealing

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

This is literally how it has always been.

You don't own any of the games you paid for, you bought a license to play those games under specific circumstances. It's the same with books & movies.

Valve have (allegedly) stated that in the case of Steam shutting down, games they can update to remove Steam DRM, they will.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

Twitter is bad.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (9 children)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago

Good Old Games Games

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By now my GOG library has far exceeded my Steam library in size. I was surprised by how many games on my Steam wishlist are also on GOG.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

I would love to do that, but GoG does not have the better regional pricing that steam does.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

no need be angry at steam. that is how it always has been. kudos to them to point it out very cleanly and not hiding it on page 400 of the 3rd EULA.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Personally I think we should bring back physical games to PC. Imagine a cartridge like device that can effectively use external storage as swap memory (which copies to ram as needed), laptops and desktops can be built with this while other computers could use an adapter.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GeneralEmergency 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's a good job Gabe Newell has made gamers comfortable with not owning their games.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jg1i 13 points 2 months ago (9 children)

OK. I know I'm about to get blown the fuck up but... You will own nothing and be happy. But. Like. Unironically.

I really don't think most people want to manage thousands of music files on their computer. Or hundreds of movie files. Or thousands of picture files. Or hundreds of video game files.

There are definitely options for doing this, but people who go this route are usually tech elite nerds. Not your parents or grandparents. Not normies.

(I self-host Navidrome, Jellyfin, Immich, etc.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

You will be blown up, and you will be happy. Enjoy the technofeudalism you so desperately long for.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Thank you California law!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Remember the people who long ago told you "in the future you will own nothing, and you will be happy"?

How'd you react? Did you call them crazy? Conspiracy theorists? Perhaps a Doomer?

You know what they should be called? Correct.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] timewarp 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In the meantime Microsoft updates their user agreement requiring you to arbitrate and to pay the arbitration fees. Fuck Microsoft.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] auzy 6 points 2 months ago

The reason people buy from steam though and develop for them though is because of their service.

Thor from pirate software mentions that even as a developer there are good reasons for them to use steam.

Even just the cloud saves and such is awesome

load more comments
view more: next ›