this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
967 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

5290 readers
4760 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bi_tux 14 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

I still find the fact that the ultra auth-left instance hexbear.net is the most republican instance on the entire fediverse extremely amusing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 28 minutes ago

Not surprising. Tankies are fascists with leftist aesthetics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 minutes ago (1 children)

How do we know that fact? I am curious. Maybe I missed something. Thanks

[–] bi_tux 1 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

we don't know for a fact, but I've spent some time on a lot of instances and they were the only ones telling me to not vote harris and instead vote trump

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

Oh I see. I know the kind of people you talk about and it is quite curious...

[–] RunawayFixer 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's always matter of time before some radical nationalists and radical socialists talk to each other, come to the realization that they actually have a lot in common and then decide to work together in a single nationalist socialist organisation. The inevitable backstabbing comes later.

Edit: I had written national instead of nationalist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Can someone please fucking explain to me how people are saying Vance won this debate?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 40 minutes ago

On reddit the bot propaganda message is that Vance won the debate. I guess the answer is Russian interference

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

if the event organizers lied it makes it more or less a draw

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

They didn't though...

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Saying this is a no-brainer is essentially in and of itself, a no-brainer. But yet, here we are, frustratingly attempting to educate leftists and undecided people on the dangers of “protest voting” and how cataclysmically dangerous it is to assume that you know better without ever seeming to possess the ability to simply just prove it.

We have the receipts. We know damn well what is going to happen if Trump is allowed to win.

And if you think you’re teaching someone a lesson with your withheld vote, I’ve got news for you-

A LOT of people are going to be hurt. And the ones you think it will be, the ones you’d want it to be- won’t be counted among them.

I promise you this.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Couldn't tell democrats to try and please their demographics instead of republicans. No, the left vote is "owed" to democrats no matter how much they turn their back on those voters. And then y'all wonder why people are disillusioned with politics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Well, when your entire political view is based on unsubstantiated rhetoric, I’d imagine it’s probably pretty easy to arrive at such a conclusion.

No vote is owed, my friend. That’s just something you all seem to like to tell yourself so that your smug arrogance has a semblance of purpose.

And trust me when I say this:

No one is wondering why you’re disillusioned with politics… disillusion- of course, being the keyword here.

Enjoy watching from the docks while rest of us pull this ship into port without your help.

[–] danc4498 38 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I wish Walz did better at calling out ALL of Vance’s bullshit. Vance said, “we as republicans need to do better to earn your trust on bodily autonomy.”

It doesn’t take much effort to say bullshit. If you want to have more trust, then don’t get rid of the only thing protecting women’s bodies!

[–] thejoker954 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly to me Walz looked so exasperated/disappointed that he was dealing with such a dumbass and his followers.

[–] stoly 6 points 7 hours ago

I got that feeling too. He was in shock a few times.

[–] stoly 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly, both will resonate equally with their bases. Although I think they Walz had a better performance, I don’t think this debate changed anything.

[–] WrenFeathers 4 points 7 hours ago

According to the numbers, it didn’t.

[–] WrenFeathers 27 points 11 hours ago

This needs to be a billboard.

EEEEEEVERYWHEEEERE!

[–] [email protected] 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Is it just my imagination, or did that weasely fuck spend the entire time Walz was talking trying to do a Jim Halpert look at the camera?

[–] Bgugi 24 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Probably because it played so well for Harris.

[–] 2ugly2live 30 points 11 hours ago

That's because she was genuinely baffled. Vance was just faking.

[–] RadicalEagle 103 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think the audience Vance's message is supposed to resonate with cares about being fact-checked, or facts in general.

Trump doesn't care if he's being fact-checked because facts don't matter to him, and his voters have the same outlook.

[–] [email protected] 111 points 14 hours ago (11 children)

It's actually worse.

The core MAGA people are utterly convinced that 'fact checking' is literally the moderators lying to prevent Republicans from saying what is actually true.

They are way, way, waaaaay down the rabbit hole of the lugenpresse, I mean fake news, that basically any time the figures they adore/worship are ever fact checked, well actually that is evidence of a vast liberal media conspiracy against them.

They actively despise fact checking, and when it happens, this triggers their conspiracism harder.

The reason why Vance made a show of crying about fact checking was partly due to personal anger/embarrassment/whatever, but the other part is that he knows that complaining about it is appealing to core Trump voters.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

JD Vance actually said that it doesn't matter because, "It's how it feels."

This mirrors almost exactly what the Alex Jones staff said during depositions. It didn't matter if they had facts. What mattered is that the alternative felt true and they would report on that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Telodzrum 22 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I’m no fan of Vance, but if you’re going to put Walz’s office in there, you have to include it for both of them.

[–] Daikusa 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›