this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
644 points (88.2% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2586 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund 12 points 2 months ago

@[email protected] Looks like Rawstory heard the complaints and modified the headline on you.

The new headline is "Trump and Vance face criminal charges over Springfield hoax"

If you could make this match, that would be great!

[–] EndOfLine 306 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Organization seeks 'immediate arrest' of Trump and Vance over Springfield hoax

Fixed the title. I read nothing to suggest that Trump or Vance are currently in any danger of being arrested in Springfield, Ohio.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 2 months ago

Yeah, they do not "face immediate arrest" there have been calls to arrest them, but they face nothing.

[–] Lauchs 143 points 2 months ago (19 children)

I'm beginning to think RawStory exaggerates their headlines for clicks. An organization has asked a court to arrest them, a FAR cry from facing immediate arrest.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

RawStory faces immediate arrest for spreading disinformation and falsely representing ongoing legal situations!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] whotookkarl 81 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

"There's nothing special about Trump and Vance that entitles them to get away with what they've done and are doing," the attorney added. "They think they're above the law. They're not."

Except for the Senate Republicans who would not hold their own accountable for crimes they committed or the federal supreme Court Justice feeding Trump's attorney legal advice to use in the lower courts. And the billions in PAC funds and trinket grifts used to campaign for politicians and appoint judges who are loyal to them above the Constitution and citizens. And anything Trump did as president is legal if he says it was part of the job. Except for those facts sure they're just like you or me in the eyes of the law.

[–] samus12345 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you can't even pretend that Trump isn't above the law when the Supreme Court has literally ruled that he is at their discretion.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Technically the ruling was for ~~crimes~~ official acts he committed while in office.

He's no longer president and holds no privilege, except being the Republican nominatee for President. Which apparently is a protected class.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund 80 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tempted to remove as "Fox by Proxy" but here's an alternate source which confirms the story and raises an excellent point:

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/25/g-s1-24436/haitian-group-charges-trump-vance-springfield

“If it were anyone else other than Trump and Vance who had done what they’ve done — wreak havoc on Springfield, resulting in bomb threats, evacuated and closed government buildings and schools, threats to the mayor and his family — they would have been arrested by now,” Chandra said. “They are not above the law.”

Chandra said the U.S. Supreme Court's July ruling granting ex-presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution does not apply in this case because Trump is currently a private citizen and Vance was not acting in his capacity as a senator when he amplified the rumors that members of Springfield’s 15,000-member Haitian community were eating people’s pets.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

"If it were anyone else ... they would have been arrested by now,” Chandra said. “They are not above the law.”

Those two sentences don't add up.

[–] rockhstrongo 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah. "They shouldn't be above the law." works better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lettruthout 77 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So this is the real reason why Trump cancelled his Springfield visit.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Trump's scared that Vance's family will eat Laura Loomer

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t understand. Is Laura Loomer a brand of couch I haven’t heard of?

[–] DrSleepless 27 points 2 months ago

Yes. Please don’t research Laura Loomer any further

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think she'd have more to be worried about with Robert Kennedy around talking to Trump. Trump is so easy to control and that dude needs help.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If you ever needed to plumb the depths of American bigotry, it's Trump appearing on stage glad-handing a dog eater and then making up some bullshit about Haitians.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 months ago (11 children)

"i'm still voting for trump!"

--this fucking guy

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt 15 points 2 months ago

Sonos DeWine, that shady fuck.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it would be pretty hilarious if this was the thing that got Trump in jail. Aaaaaall the other stuff? Nah. but this Springfield hoax? Yeah we got to do something about that.

[–] just_another_person 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Al Capone got put away for Tax Evasion, so anything is possible I guess.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If only the IRS had the teeth now as it did then, we'd never heard about this trump fellow.

[–] bitjunkie 11 points 2 months ago

We probably would have heard about him going to prison in the 80s.

[–] Boddhisatva 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Silly billies. Don't they know that the law doesn't apply to rich people?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago
[–] Gradually_Adjusting 47 points 2 months ago

Good on them for trying.

[–] Feathercrown 35 points 2 months ago

As fucking if lmao

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Trump isn't ever going to actually go to jail. That would set a precedent for us to actually keep our political leaders accountable, and that ain't happening.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThePantser 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well that's one way to keep them out of your city while campaigning. Can we do that here in MI? I'm sick of them being here every week.

[–] chakan2 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Have an immigrant file a suit for libel (or slander...I forgot which is which. Hell, both).

[–] Volkditty 41 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramenshaman 20 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I'll believe it when I see it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

In case anybody doesn’t feel like disabling their ad blocker, here’s a bypass link: https://12ft.io/https://www.rawstory.com/trump-vance-criminal-charges/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CaptainKickass 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm positive that they'll be arrested and face justice 🤦🏽

load more comments
view more: next ›