this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
256 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12537 readers
819 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rtxn 82 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I know certain sentiments are coming, so I'll put this here: Three Mile Island wasn't the unmitigated disaster that fearmongers would have you believe. It was an ultimately harmless accident that was highly publicized because of poor communication and irresponsible sensationalist journalism.

More on the topic: https://youtu.be/cL9PsCLJpAA

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It was actually a success story. It failed safe, as designed.

Unfortunately "The China Syndrome" really pumped up anti-nuclesr sentiment.

TMI was the opposite of Chernobyl.

[–] shalafi 3 points 3 months ago

Heh, you see my posts? That movie came out not 2-weeks ahead of 3-Mile. Freaky isn't it?

[–] ilinamorato 35 points 3 months ago

Yep. And underscoring that more than almost anything else is the fact that the TMI facility continued to operate without incident for forty years after that accident.

[–] shalafi 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Posted this earlier:

A poof of radioactive steam let loose. That's it, the whole incident. People freaked out on March 28, 1979.

In totally unrelated news, The China Syndrome, a popular movie about a reactor meltdown, came out March 16, 1979.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Nuclear" sounds scary but it doesn't have to be and generally isn't. There are currently 94 active nuclear reactors in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_the_United_States

IMHO, the correct take on " uses enormous amounts of energy" is "yes, we do need to invest more in renewable and clean energy". Anyone who didn't have their head in the sand could have known that last century. This is only a problem now because our political leaders have failed us, year after year, decade after decade.

[–] Fondots 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Small addendum, there's 94 commercial reactors that are generating power for the grid

But there's a few dozen more active nuclear reactors that exist for things like training and research.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_research_reactors#United_States

[–] Maggoty 7 points 3 months ago

And then there's like 80 reactors moving around the world, docking in our ports.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Thank you for the clarification!

[–] rtxn 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

“Nuclear” sounds scary

Related, unfun fact: MRI used to be called NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, because it used the nuclear magnetic resonance phenomenon (literally a nuclear vibe check), but people were so afraid of the word "nuclear" that it was dropped.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

😒🫸 MRI

😎👉 NVC

[–] Maggoty 5 points 3 months ago

I thought the Netflix show was pretty clear it wasn't as bad as popular history made it out to be.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Don't get me wrong, nuclear energy is good. It's just being used to power AI. That's a waste. It's being used so a corporation can profit, not to power homes. It's being used to potentially replace humans, who need less power to function and whose power consumption cannot already be avoided anyway.

[–] MissJinx 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (16 children)

A nuclear plant is not a bad thing, that's one of the cleanest eneegy sources BUT being Microsoft I'm glad it's at least on an island

[–] rtxn 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's on an island, yes. In a river, ten kilometres from a dense urban region.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

And it's the site that an American president came closest to dying in a nuclear explosion! (I mean that's not why it's notable, but it's a fun fact anyways.)

[–] Viking_Hippie 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A nuclear plant is not a bad thing

This specific one famously is.

[–] MissJinx 2 points 3 months ago

Lol I didn't know that

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Cryophilia 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I did not expect there to be so many "nuclear is scary!" idiots here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I live in Italy. I may even trust nuclear power (even though I'm not sure if waste management has improved), I don't trust actual human beings handling contracts, funds, and maintenance.

A bridge collapsed in Genoa, killing 43 people, splitting the city in two, and crippling the economy because Autostrade per l'Italia skirted the pesky issue of maintenance.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I hadn't realized until I hung out on a Europe forum that anti-nuclear-power positions are very strong in Germany with the center-left.

Western Austria also has a history here. At one point, they infamously built an entire nuclear power plant -- which is where the real costs of nuclear power come from -- and then shut it down via a referendum driven by the anti-nuclear-power crowd before ever actually using it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwentendorf_Nuclear_Power_Plant

The Zwentendorf Nuclear Power Plant was the first commercial nuclear plant for electric power generation built in Austria, of three nuclear plants originally envisioned. Construction of the plant at Zwentendorf was finished but the plant never entered service. The start-up of the Zwentendorf plant, as well as the construction of the other two plants, was prevented by a referendum on 5 November 1978, in which a narrow majority of 50.47% voted against the start-up.[1][2]

The plant was purchased by Austrian energy company EVN Group in 2005; it is used as a security training centre[6] and leased for filming, photography, and other events.[7] In 2025, it will be used as the training ground for ENRICH European Robotics Hackathon.[8]

[–] Cryophilia 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah and lemmy is more European leaning than I'm used to. There's a huge European contingent

[–] linearchaos 1 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately it's like the lottery, and fear of flying. You can explain the odds and the history until you're blue in the face but it doesn't mean anything when somebody sees a documentary and it fills their whole psyche with terror. And you can try to explain that there are safer plant designs out there and that being careful about where you put a plant is a big deal, but the only thing they're going to walk away from the conversation with is Chernobyl, Fukushima in Three Mile Island.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

The fucking timeline we’re in

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

I live near enough to TMI that a catastrophic event would be severely detrimental to my health, but I see this as a good thing (if you can call AI good). Clean, safe energy, and jobs for people in an area that needs jobs, win-win.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

This is just begging for a kernel memory space access joke...

[–] HowManyNimons 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

ELI5 please why they don't just put their server farms in a desert, roofed with solar panels and a big-bum battery?

[–] BradleyUffner 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The Susquehanna River that Three Mile Island sits on offers virtually unlimited fresh cold water for cooling the server farm.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fucking up the temperature downstream; global warming baby! But who needs that ecosystem? It's survive or die, and that includes the beavers! Down with trees, up with fleas(markets)!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Total ecological collapse is a small price to pay to boost shareholders' wealth by 0.1%!

line must go up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuperIce 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Because you want data centers to be closer to the users for speed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Transit latency is a tiny tiny fraction of the round trip time for AI processing tasks. Until AI tasks are in the order of milliseconds instead of seconds it's a rounding error.

[–] HowManyNimons 3 points 3 months ago

Doesn't that depend on the application?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Knowing the incompetence of Microsoft is making me re-think my pro-nuclear stance...maybe it should be banned.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

You can see the cooling towers from the highway. It's not secluded.

[–] Diplomjodler3 2 points 3 months ago

Cool. Nothing could possibly go wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

ah yes nothing will go wrong no meltdowns whatsoever

load more comments
view more: next ›