InsanePeopleFacebook

They really said that genetic disease is an accumulation of sin. Like someone is born with Downs Syndrome because their grandmother cheats at rummy.

"Why are you fucking your sister?!"

“Uh, God said I could. How dare you question Him."

No one commented on “get his wife”? I assume a bride mail order catalog? They must have existed back then.

6 sounds more like "if you want to allow gay marriage you better shut up about incest"

Oh my parts 3 and 4 they're so close to figuring out what the Darwin guy was talking about

Not sure I would trust anything from the creation museum to be actually biblical.

I know there’s an ancient myth about Adam having a first wife before Eve — there’s probably also other myths that fill in the blanks. There’s also nothing stopping God from making more people during this period like he made Adam and Eve. They were probably just the “first batch” so to speak.

I loved their explanation regarding building the Ark authentically when Noah lived to be over 900 years old. It's simple really. He built it when he was like 300. You see it makes perfect sense. Next question.

weirdly that might effectively be true, many other animals don't really suffer from inbreeding, and there's an hypothesis that humans are so vulnerable to it because a shiteload of us died all at once a long time ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youngest_Toba_eruption#Toba_catastrophe_theory

nice little dig at evolution calling mutations "mistakes". as in, they happen but they can only be negative.

since God's Word is the only standard for defining proper marriage

oh - and where's that? the bit where multiple wives are ok (Solomon), or where multiple wives is commanded (Levrite marriage) or where slave girls are ok ("concubines" being the usual euphamism) or where polygamy is disallowed but only for church leaders (this seems like the worst one tbh, the very necessity of this rule means there were sufficient polygamous relationships in the early church that it even warrants a mention...)

Touché.

*nods*

Just reread Genesis 2 and 3. There's no mention of childbirth until then and she isn't even named Eve until then and partly because she would become a mother. I believe a fair interpretation is that childbirth is inherently painful and that the two didn't even know about concepts like sex before eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. There's no evidence to suggest that from a biblical perspective childbirth would've been painfree had there been no original sin, though there is evidence to suggest there would've been no childbirth at all without it.