this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
84 points (93.8% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2770 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orclev 52 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He's polling at 0% already, can't really get any lower. He has never at any point been a serious contender. He was always intended as a spoiler to try to siphon a few votes away from the actual candidates.

[–] cheese_greater 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Love how he promised to drop-out when Biden did and yet here he is

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

He is waiting for Trump's donors to tell him when he's done. Without the infusion of pro-Trump mega donor money he would have been done ages ago.

[–] Snowclone 9 points 3 months ago

Yeah my immediate reaction was ''what campaign?'

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In a lawsuit that was engineered by Clear Choice PAC, a super PAC formed earlier this year by political allies of President Joseph Biden to combat independent candidates or third-party efforts that could threaten the Democratic ticket

Fuck RFK and his brainworm-eaten maggoty brain, but keep in mind that Dems want to block any other choice. It's why Bernie ran as a Dem and even then they still worked together to block him. I'm voting KH to prevent the asshole from getting the seat, but Dems are center-right, not Left. People have been brainwashed into thinking it's normal to have a Left party that barely fights for them. Advocate for rank-choice voting and we'll see a lot of Dems get replaced in the election that follows.

[–] Sanctus 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ranked choice is next, the time is ticking on this engineered Overton window. If we get that, we might actually join modern civilization instead of being corporate vassals in a trench coat.

[–] fluxion 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Imagine not having to sit around waiting for another inevitable corporate-backed coup to strip our voting rights away because we have a system strong enough to survive a couple billionaires posting endless lies on Twitter.

After everything they've done to corrupt both parties through lobbyists, funding, and industry plants, it's just a matter of time unless we fix our system to be more resilient against manipulation with things like ranked choice voting.

[–] Sanctus 4 points 3 months ago

The only way to prevent billionaires from jorkin' the system, is to make sure the system can't create billionaires. Tax the rich.

[–] jordanlund 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"He notes that he is registered to vote at this Katonah address, that his car is registered there, and that he pays New York State income taxes. He adds that he maintains falconry, fishing, and hunting licenses at this address."

The last time I saw residency being an issue was for an Oregon candidate for governor, in his case all that evidence went the OTHER way.

He had been claiming a family farm in Oregon as his residence, but his voter registration, drivers license, and taxes were all in New York. He was bounced off the ballot.

https://www.opb.org/article/2022/02/17/oregon-supreme-court-ruling-nick-kristof-oregon-residency-governors-race/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Seems like his car registration and recreational licenses in New York State would be less relevant. And it seems like maintaining voter registration and state income tax status based on his "renting a room in a friend's house in New York State" while he physically resides in California for years is exploiting a loophole at best.

Edit: If you're trying to pretend to officially reside in two different places, fuck you.

[–] Rapidcreek 10 points 3 months ago

If he doesn't do it all by himself

[–] barsquid 9 points 3 months ago

Sink? Was it ever floating? Even before a worm chewed a hole in the hull?

[–] massacre 7 points 3 months ago

TIL, that RFK Jr. is still running for President.

[–] ZombieMantis 5 points 3 months ago

As opposed to before?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

He’s just a money sink for domestic terrorists probably.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The court case: BRAINWORM VS. RFK’S SANITY

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

The sequel to The Wall

[–] Dorkyd68 2 points 3 months ago

Campaign for what exactly? Dude is more irrelevant than my dick

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Other than dumping a bear just because it is fun, what could possibly keep this guy from office.

[–] orclev 1 points 3 months ago

The fact that less then 1% of voters would vote for him?

[–] kikutwo -1 points 3 months ago

It still needs sinking? This guy looks old and white also, bring the downvotes.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -2 points 3 months ago

Mother Jones - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Mother Jones:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-new-york-residency-case-clear-choice-pac/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support