this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
125 points (94.3% liked)

politics

18889 readers
3941 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] geekworking 61 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Being a reporter for The Onion gets harder every day with these chuckle fucks turning your material into real life.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lemme get one of those spaceman with a gun memes where the whole world is an onion.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

🧅🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

[–] ObsidianZed 2 points 2 months ago
[–] makyo 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah satire is pretty well dead

[–] Rapidcreek 61 points 2 months ago

there is no bottom

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 46 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] elbarto777 15 points 2 months ago
[–] TheDoozer 6 points 2 months ago

I was about to say, I had just read two Onion articles in the last ten minutes, and thought The Onion was hitting it hard today. Then I saw what community this was in and despaired.

[–] kmartburrito 3 points 2 months ago

Nope, and they cost $300. That's kinda funny though. Guaranteed they're made in China and cost less than ten bucks.

[–] very_well_lost 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Eldritch 8 points 2 months ago

That's an extremely apropos reference on many accounts.

[–] shalafi 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Everything on that site is tacky beyond belief. And wildly overpriced.

[–] Nightwingdragon 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course. When you have literally millions of suckers in your cult begging for reasons to throw their money at you, you milk it for all its worth. This isn't geared towards the normal people who know how tacky this shit is. This is geared towards the ones that are so far to the right and have his dick shoved so far down their throat that they're flossing their teeth with his pubes.

That, and the MTGs of Congress who will buy these just to ~~kiss Trump's ass~~ "show their solidarity with the President". 5,000 pairs of overprices sneakers isn't tough to move when there are enough people who will buy them for the sole purpose of sucking up to him. Whether or not you've bought any of his products will likely be a test of loyalty in the near future, if it isn't already.

[–] cheese_greater 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought its primarly money-laundering

[–] Nightwingdragon 1 points 2 months ago

Trump stands to make $1.5 million (minus expenses) from selling these. That's pocket change to Trump. Not worth getting involved with to clear maybe $1 million after the dust settles. He seems to always charge $300 each when he peddles his crap, which makes me think that's simply the sweet spot to maximize how much Trump can grift out of the rubes without going into sticker shock.

If this were money laundering, there wouldn't be a limit and the sneakers would be a lot more expensive. They wouldn't want rubes buying them because that means they'd have to actually produce the sneakers, increasing their expenses. They would simply be "available" at stupidly expensive prices so Trump's associates can funnel thousands or millions of dollars at a time to "buy" sneakers that will never arrive. You know. For re-sale. Or as a collector's item. Or to give away to friends/supporters. Or whatever excuse they can come up with when they're asked where the sneakers they supposedly bought ended up.

If this were money laundering, it's the dumbest money laundering scheme in the history of ever. Maximum exposure and risk for minimum reward. With that said, that could also be used as the reason to believe Trump would be dumb enough to do this. But he's got $45 million a month coming from Musk alone; he's not going to bother getting into elaborate money laundering schemes for 2% of that. Selling the sneakers to rubes is simply grabbing the low hanging fruit.

[–] Delusional 3 points 2 months ago

I'd expect nothing less from an evil conman.

[–] MimicJar 4 points 2 months ago

Simpsons did it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Damn I scrolled past thinking it was onion flavored.

[–] comador 3 points 2 months ago

Ranks right up there with the "Presidential Pleasure" Trump Buttplug.

[–] Sterile_Technique 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


GetTrumpSneakers.com, a website owned by Donald Trump, is the go-to retailer to secure a pair of high-top sneakers printed with an image from the recent assassination attempt against the former president.

The white sneaker features a five-star American flag on the upper portion of the shoe, just above the photo of Trump holding his fist up after being shot in the ear at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, last weekend.

If that wasn’t enough, the site is incentivizing supporters to purchase the unsightly footwear with a bonus offer: 10 pairs will be randomly autographed by Trump.

Sizes 5 through 8 are still listed online, with all pairs expected to ship in September or October with each being made to order.

“Show your support and patriotic pride with these exclusive sneakers, capturing a defining moment in history,” a description on the website reads, claiming that the shoes “honor his unwavering determination and bravery.” The shooting left Trump bleeding, but otherwise stable.

Those shoes were announced at Sneaker Con Philadelphia the day after he was ordered to pay $454 million in fines for years of bank fraud in New York — and a few weeks after he was hit with a $83.3 million ruling in a rape defamation case.


The original article contains 302 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 31%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] I_Fart_Glitter 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sizes 5 through 8 are still listed online, with all pairs expected to ship in September or October with each being made to order.

If they're being made to order why are they only available in small...? Average men's shoe size in the US is 10.5.

Not the weirdest part of this article for sure, but still.

[–] AbidanYre 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"September or October" seems far enough away that anyone dumb enough to order these will have forgotten by then anyway.

[–] Jimbabwe 2 points 2 months ago

If I were running this scam, I’d wait a month then push that to December (blame Biden, ofc). Then when Trump loses in November I’d just keep the money and make excuses. Nobody is going to push tooooo hard to get their loser sneakers.

If he actually manages to win, I’d probably have to make the stupid sneakers or get thrown in a Libtard Camp. Though I’m probably getting thrown in one of those anyway..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It. Is. Not. A. KKKUlt.

[–] xc2215x 1 points 2 months ago

Of course he would.

[–] TheBigBrother -4 points 2 months ago

I must admit this seems like good marketing tbh..