this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
299 points (96.0% liked)

News

23317 readers
3615 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 128 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago

They'll be sending in some Secret Service brain worms dressed in tiny black suits and itty bitty sunglasses to protect the OG. Rest assured, it will be safe.

[–] Tylerdurdon 10 points 4 months ago

Sir! They're already inside the perimeter!

[–] givesomefucks 75 points 4 months ago (4 children)

You know what?

Good on RFK Jr. 50 years ago just the thought of him being able to escape the political shadow of the previous generation of Kennedys would have been laughable.

But when I saw this headline I legitimately forgot about his dad and uncle both being assassinated. My brain went straight to the brain worms.

It's honestly kind of crazy he's not just a Jeb! type guy whose only notable feature is his last name.

[–] FlyingSquid 28 points 4 months ago

whose only notable feature is his last name.

"Running for president despite the brain worms" is also quite notable.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

If we judge a man on the content of his character instead of judging him on the worm content of his brain… we’ll judge Kennedy worse

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] tacosplease 1 points 4 months ago
[–] pyre 2 points 4 months ago

yeah Jeb! should've shit his pants on stage so he would be remembered as the guy who shit his pants on stage rather than just a Bush.

sometimes not being notable is the better outcome

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Secret Service had to be punished for their screw up.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Evotech 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Either way you look at it they screwed up

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What a completely random thing to do.

[–] meant2live218 88 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It makes sense to me. Biden and Trump have Secret Service detail already. RFK does not. Biden wants to make sure that it at least looks like all 3 candidates are being protected from more violence.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

But why ~~J~~RFK Jr and not Jill Stein or Cornell West?

[–] FlyingSquid 58 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Because more than three people will vote for RFK Jr.

Also, JFK Jr. is dead.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The mainstream media only wants you to think JFK Jr. is dead.

[–] FlyingSquid 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We were told not to discuss that in the last Q drop.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Banned from next drop for leaking 😠

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LustyArgonianMana 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For probably 2 or 3 reasons:

  • To bring attention to RFK Jr to help remove votes from Trump

  • RFK Jr is much more known to right wingers, who are also more violent. They don't even really know of Cornell West or Jill Stein enough to care. RFK Jr is running opposite of Trump on the Right wingers side, whereas the other two will only strip votes from leftwing/Biden side

  • Kennedy Curse, they shouldn't have lobotomized Rosemary Kennedy. So anything could happen to ol brain worms

[–] Bernie_Sandals 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because neither of them have polled high enough to qualify for it, neither has the libertarian candidate, even RFK Jr. wasn't polling well enough for it, which is why Biden had to order this, and it wasn't done automatically.

He's also a Kennedy, so his chance of being assassinated is probably higher than your average candidate.

[–] Zoomboingding 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Assassination is hereditary!?

[–] Bernie_Sandals 4 points 4 months ago

For the Kennedys it certainly seems so

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Just look at what happened to the European royal families …

[–] Grimy 11 points 4 months ago

Just his name makes him a copy cat magnet tbh.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cosmicrookie 6 points 4 months ago

But imagine the consequences of not doing it, and him getting assassinated! Not worth the risk. Also, i assume this is the future standard Trump is looking into. Competition being legal targets for the sitting president

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

Worm beat them to it

[–] recapitated 14 points 4 months ago

Kennedy is still trying to appear on ballots across the country, and his presidential aspirations are a long shot.

😬

[–] Gonzako 11 points 4 months ago

I guess they'll have to shoot the brain worm out

[–] massacre 10 points 4 months ago

I get it, but I mean... their track record isn't so great with Kennedys assassination attempts.

[–] IndustryStandard 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Only RFK and not other candidates?

[–] TheLowestStone 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'd bet the vast majority of Americans can't name any candidates besides Biden and Trump and that some could not name them either.

[–] EnderWiggin 4 points 4 months ago

Trump already has the SS.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I think this Kennedy is probably pretty safe unless you count questionable life choices.

[–] njm1314 6 points 4 months ago

He's so desperate for attention he'd jump in front of a bullet

[–] Passerby6497 6 points 4 months ago

The worm is going to have a dedicated agent

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Should've had secret service protection long before now. The guys had to relatives assassinated.

[–] Tronn4 3 points 4 months ago

I understood that reference

load more comments
view more: next ›