this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
191 points (94.0% liked)

politics

18791 readers
4272 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

His posting of a video of a man cursing at Joe Scarborough sends a broader message: If elected, he’ll use state power to come after countless other Americans.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndOfLine 148 points 3 months ago (5 children)

"suddenly take a dangerous turn"?

What direction did they think his actions were headed?

[–] newthrowaway20 33 points 3 months ago

For real. This is a straight path. No turning necessary.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Who ever could have seen this coming?! So outta the blue!

[–] disguy_ovahea 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You’re right. There has been plenty of danger from his posts. From the insurrection, to driving a car through BLM protests, the attack on Paul Pelosi, charging the FBI headquarters, and attempting to drive onto Capitol Hill.

This is the video to which the article is referring.

[–] Zachariah 7 points 3 months ago

dangerouser

[–] foggy 2 points 3 months ago
[–] tsonfeir 53 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zehzin 21 points 3 months ago

To be fair, you can't expect the news to know about things that happen.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago

Dear media,

You're maybe two verses of Niemoller's poem from "...and there was no one to speak for me.".

Stop carrying water for this man and his sycophants, it will not end well for you, or anyone you care about.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Scarborough is a Reagan Conservative. That he's being branded a "Liberal" because he disagrees with the MAGA camp should be a scary item in and of itself.

[–] Marthirial 13 points 3 months ago

Correct. And a neocon. That's the GOP exit strategy when the Trump cult collapses: We never thought it would go this far, but we are back to our core conservative principles which are just about the same but without the clowning.

[–] Hobbes_Dent 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The media and the oligarchy need to become self-aware of the threats in front of their faces. Maybe then the former will return to doing its job for us and our safety and not for the latter.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We used to have laws that decentralized control of media. An entity could only own a certain number of newspapers, tv stations, or radio stations. There were incentives for smaller news companies to insure that there was competition in each market. Congress kept chipping away at those laws letting larger companies buy up more and more of the market, allowing mergers that restricted competition. Now radio is nearly a monopoly, TV and newspapers are oligarchies. The Internet fell into an oligarchy disturbingly quickly.

The only way to get the media serving the people again is to break up the big companies and restore the guardrails that protected and supported small local companies.

[–] pivot_root 9 points 3 months ago

I hate to say it, but that will never happen. Politicians only chase the money, and the money wants to keep their monopolies and oligarchies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] whostosay 2 points 3 months ago

These videos are more dreadful than most. Nothing works quite like that to make you realize just how prepared and aimed cable news is. When I see shit like "Russia's state-run news agency says" I wonder if CBS, NBC, CNN, and FOX are our equivalent when something from one of them is posted abroad.

[–] kmartburrito 29 points 3 months ago

🌎👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[–] JeeBaiChow 9 points 3 months ago

Media is shocked. Shocked, I tell you!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Danny Boy has forgotten he's Lebanese. He's not on the favorites list for White Nationalists sadly, and Uncle Donnie will deport him. Jesus these people are fucking clueless about what he is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

White isn't about who you were born to. It's about who you hate.

[–] elbarto777 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I understand the sentiment, but I can't agree with this. Plenty of business owners in China placing signs like "no Africans allowed" at their entrances. They're not white.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This was specifically in the context of American white nationalism. Pointing out Chinese policies is very much missing the point.

That being said, I'm not here to argue. If you want to point out that a pithy rhetorical phrase is lacking in nuance, I'll be the first to say you're absolutely right.

[–] elbarto777 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, friend. I was being pedantic. Point taken.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I don't know, mate. Maybe some folks needed to be told. I do sometimes have an overly optimistic appraisal of my fellow humans. Keep on trucking.

[–] nutsack 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

yes what a turn

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Some will give Trump the benefit of the doubt. Surely Trump thought the video was funny. Surely he only intended his MSNBC nemesis as the target. Surely calling a person or group “done” is just a figure of speech. And Scarborough doesn’t appear to feel threatened by the guy in the video. He was just a crank, right?

And the rest will correctly read the message and violence will occur and Trump's hands will be clean because "obviously he was misinterpreted."