submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/news

Stanley Kubrick, the relentless perfectionist who directed some of cinema’s greatest classics, was so sensitive to criticism that, in 1970, he threatened legal action to block publication of a book which dared to discuss flaws in his films.

The director of Spartacus and 2001: A Space Odyssey, warned the book’s author and publisher that he would fight “tooth and nail” and “use every legal means at his disposal” to prevent its publication – and he did.

Now, 25 years after his death, the book Kubrick did not want anyone to read is being published, more than half a century late.

The Magic Eye: The Cinema of Stanley Kubrick by Neil Hornick now has three prefaces reflecting its subject’s ruthlessness in trying to block publication and control his image.

Hornick, now 84, from London, said Kubrick’s legal threats had come as a shock: “I regard it as a painful episode.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stern 122 points 1 month ago

A well regarded artistic mind being kind of a piece of shit? I am shocked! I'm just thankful personal favorites of mine like Orson Scott Card, J.K. Rowling, and H.P. Lovecraft are fine, upstanding individuals who've dodged controversy at every turn.

Wait hold on... He's a massive homophobe? She said what? He named his cat that?

Oh... well... umm... lovely weather we're having huh?

[-] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago

That's the nice thing about being a Terry Pratchett fan. The more I learn about him, the more I love him.

[-] NotAViciousCyborg 44 points 1 month ago

And Tolkien. Fuck his estate though

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

And L Ron Hubbard! Wait...

[-] FlyingSquid 51 points 1 month ago

To be fair, the name of Lovecraft's cat was the tip of the iceberg when it came to him. I love the world building he did, but it's kind of hard to read a lot of his stories filled with big-lipped, dark savages. On the other hand, with Lovecraft, it seemed less a case of "white people are superior" and more a case of "all of humanity deserves to be thrown into the hellbeast pit, but white people should be thrown in last," which is... still racist, but I guess not supremacist exactly?

Apparently his Jewish wife occasionally had to remind him who he married when he would go off on an antisemitic tirade, which I find quite amusing.

[-] masquenox 26 points 1 month ago

Nope. Lovecraft was about as white supremacist as it gets - he literally excused lynchings of black folks and the KKK's terrorism because, supposedly, white people had to resort to "extra-legal measures" to protect themselves from (supposed) "mongrelisation."

Ie, just your bog-standard white supremacism on a stick.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

What I really love about Lovecraft was how inclusionary the community around the Cthulhu mythos has become.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

I remember reading a biography (autobiography maybe; forget who actually wrote it) on HP Lovecraft where it mentioned his cats name and I thought "well he was from the 1800's so product of the time..." and then find out the dude was so racist, the KKK kicked him out.

[-] SkyezOpen 4 points 4 weeks ago
[-] Dkarma 19 points 1 month ago

So glad someone is calling out card here.

Orson Scott card is a pile of shit.

[-] Furedadmins 12 points 1 month ago

And his work is shit. I have no idea why so many adults think that young adult level writing and storytelling is the work of a master.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah I thought Enders Game was the best book ever when I read it in like 4th or 5th grade. I read through the whole series of books over the next few years and enjoyed them at the time. I went back to read Enders Game as an adult and realized I just really enjoyed the wish fulfillment in reading about a bullied kid smashing the bullies face in then running shit. You’re right, it’s a pretty basic book and I have no idea why any adult would hold it or Card up as anything but basic. The only good thing I have to say about it as an adult is that it helped ignite my love of science fiction.

[-] RememberTheApollo_ 8 points 1 month ago

Tbf the first books of misunderstood child prodigy messiah in a sci fi setting were pretty good. The lack of much deviation for everything following sucked. Then there’s his politics…

[-] Furedadmins 4 points 1 month ago

Enders game is pretty simplistic outcast juvenile wish fulfillment. If you read it as a kid I am sure it seemed more than space Harry potter but meh. I don't know how it could be more pandering without a committee of child psychologists helping write it.

[-] braxy29 4 points 1 month ago

i don't particularly recall that it was intended for young adults at the time. it was just genre fiction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I don't read them either. Plenty of good art that's not written by assholes.

[-] braxy29 9 points 1 month ago

i figure, if you dig far enough into most any creator, you are more likely to find an asshole than not. the effect increases with increasing remove (ie they lived a long time ago).

i don't say this to excuse what's problematic, but i believe bad people can make good art, and also that most people aren't angels.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah I try not to judge. But when there's patterns of behavior and abuse I'm done. Note the word patterns.

Everyone has isolated fuck ups on their past that's just part of being human. But when people are consistently assholes and show no remorse, why would I give them my support?

Other people can appreciate their art if they want. I'm not making it an ethical argument for everybody else. It just feels icky to me. So I don't enjoy it. So I don't consume it.

[-] braxy29 6 points 1 month ago

i will confess, i find it harder to like Frank Lloyd Wright and Picasso than i used to. i suppose this is the meaning of "never meet your heroes." they very often disappoint; sometimes you might never see their work the same way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 63 points 1 month ago

I love his movies and he was definitely a genius director, but man, was he a gigantic asshole...

[-] FlyingSquid 63 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A total monster. The way he treated Shelly Duvall on the set of The Shining was inexcusable. I absolutely love his films, but he was a very bad man.

[-] CitizenKong 23 points 1 month ago

He also called Stephen King at 3 in the morning, asked him stupid questions about his book and then hung up on him without even saying goodbye.

[-] FlyingSquid 47 points 1 month ago

I'd say that's the least of his crimes when it came to The Shining. He gave Duvall a nervous breakdown and her hair started falling out.

[-] ours 4 points 4 weeks ago

And King was probably up on cocaine anyway.

[-] ArtVandelay 18 points 1 month ago

Yep, I have to go watch Popeye so I can see her happy again

[-] FlyingSquid 28 points 1 month ago

Stanley Kubrick is my favorite director of all time. I consider Barry Lyndon such high art that if you could frame it, it would belong in the Louvre. But he was entirely about managing everything about his films and his life to precise detail, so it doesn't surprise me that he canceled a book that had criticisms he didn't care for.

Really, most unvarnished truths about Kubrick were only ever going to come out after his death when his correspondence could be studied and people could be interviewed with proper hindsight.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I liked his stuff until I actually read the Shining and realized what a heartless shit he is. He turned a (believe it or not) heartfelt story into Hollywood murder porn and abused Shelly Duvall in the process. I get why Stephen King couldn't stand the guy.

[-] FlyingSquid 27 points 1 month ago

There are so many absolutely horrible movie directors that make amazing movies that you'd probably never see half the greatest films of all time if you avoided them all. Hitchcock was a rapist. Polanski raped a child. John Landis killed an adult and two children to get a good shot. We won't even go into Woody Allen. Fucking John Lasseter was a sexual harasser. And that's just a small sampling.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Yet I still quit listening to Lizzo because she turned out to be a piece of shit. Plenty of other great artists that don't treat their staff like shit.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I feel the same about aerosmith. When I actually read the lyrics to most of Aerosmiths songs, it became a question of how the fuck is Steven Tyler not in prison. Half their songs are about how much they want to have sex with minors.

[-] AngryCommieKender 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Blues Traveler answered your question with a whole song back in the 90s:

It doesn't matter what I say

So long as I sing with inflection

That makes you feel I'll convey

Some inner truth or vast reflection

But I've said nothing so far

And I can keep it up for as long as it takes

And it don't matter who you are

If I'm doing my job, it's your resolve that breaks

Because the hook brings you back

I ain't tellin' you no lie

The hook brings you back

On that you can rely

There is something amiss

I am being insincere

In fact I don't mean any of this

Still my confession draws you near

To confuse the issue I refer

To familiar heroes from long ago

No matter how much Peter loved her

What made the Pan refuse to grow

Was that hook brings you back

I ain't tellin' you no lie

The hook brings you back

On that you can rely

Suck it in, suck it in, suck it in, if you're Rin Tin Tin or Anne Boleyn

Make a desperate move or else you'll win and then begin to see

What you're doing to me, this MTV is not for free

It's so PC it's killing me, so desperately I sing to thee of love

Sure, but also of rage and hate and pain and fear of self

And I can't keep these feelings on the shelf

I've tried, well, no, in fact I lied

Could be financial suicide, but I've got too much pride inside

To hide or slide, I'll do as I'll decide and let it ride until I've died

And only then shall I abide this tide

Of catchy little tunes of hip three minute diddys

I wanna bust all your balloons

I wanna burn all your cities to the ground

I've found I will not mess around unless I play then hey

I will go on all day, hear what I say

I have a prayer to pray that's really all this was

And when I'm feeling stuck and need a buck

I don't rely on luck because

The hook brings you back

I ain't tellin' you no lie

The hook

On that you can rely

TL:DR dude went on a 3.5 minute rant about how no one listens to the lyrics, hit the top 10 in the US with said song, and was totally correct that no one would know what the song was even about.

[-] dogslayeggs 2 points 4 weeks ago

I contend the only reason that song hit top 10 was because that Rin Tin Tin line. Everyone is a sucker for a good dog story.

[-] FlyingSquid 4 points 1 month ago

I don't know that Lizzo is comparable to Alfred Hitchcock.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

They both turned out to be creeps. I don't need to know much more about their art. Art comes from the heart so if your heart is creepy I don't really give a shit about your art right

[-] ChunkMcHorkle 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Polanski raped a child.

Multiple children. A number of other now adult women have later accused Polanski of raping them when they were teenagers. Right now he's back in legal trouble right now for another, earlier victim that has now come forward. Not sure what it will accomplish as it's a civil trial, he doesn't have to come back for it, but at least this accuser will get her day in court, and if she wins she can garnish/levy any US assets he may hold or generate.

And Woody Allen . . . DELETED because I will not give pedophile apologists a springboard for defense of his sick shit.

EDITED TO ADD: The asshole who defended him on this thread just downvoted like thirty of my posts in the last hour, apparently thinking downvotes are private in his vast personal command of technology. Seriously. I just attached screenshots. This is hilarious! I want you to know I will go to bed tonight laughing because I pissed off a pedophile apologist enough for him to hunt me down and girly bitchslap as many of my comments with downvotes as he could reach, lol. Go git the rest of 'em, lil buddy. There's only like 1200+ more to go, and I know you've been working up that hand strength, so give it a shot. Wear yourself out, seriously. And then follow me like a sad puppy for the rest of your online days because hiding in the shadows is what the people you defend love the most.

SECOND EDIT to add Imgur link: https://imgur.com/a/I6QUrtx

[-] FlyingSquid 3 points 1 month ago

he was never that good anyway

I can't agree there. He directed some masterpieces. But I can't bring myself to watch them anymore. Maybe after he's dead...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheBat 15 points 1 month ago

What a snowflake

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
255 points (98.9% liked)


21135 readers
5936 users here now

Welcome to the News community!


1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 11 months ago