this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
305 points (97.8% liked)

News

25267 readers
6325 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A full 12-person jury has been sworn in for ex-US President Donald Trump's historic criminal trial in New York City.

"We have our jury," Justice Juan Merchan declared after seven men and five women were selected for the panel. Two jurors had to be excused earlier.

Some thought jury selection might take weeks, but things moved quickly after Mr Trump's team ran out of challenges.

The court could hear opening arguments as soon as Monday.

The trial, the first ever in which a former US president is the defendant, stems from a hush-money payment to a porn star.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 99 points 10 months ago (3 children)

How soon before all of them get doxxed?

[–] [email protected] 84 points 10 months ago (4 children)

One already has, sort of anyway. Her occupation, city of residence, and employer were shared on TV and she received phone calls right after asking if she was on the jury. Yesterday she asked to be excused out of fear for her safety.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hush-money-trial-04-18-24/h_1ff02b074c82044242ec0b3e31d2294a

[–] FlyingSquid 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That was what made me suggest the rest will. And it will happen in his other cases too. There is a Russian hacker army at the ready.

[–] Mirshe 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not even Russian hackers, just bored MAGAts who know how to work a few websites. If you know a few key pieces of information, you can find pretty much anyone in the US with relative ease.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

They can't get the names of who is actually on the jury that way. That will take Putin.

[–] Postmortal_Pop 7 points 10 months ago

I mean, you really don't need the names, if you can narrow it down to say, every 34 year old black woman working at theaters in Detroit that's that's maybe 20 people tops and likely closer to 5. You could easily harass 5-20 locals on your own and MAGA likes it's flock mentality. If they're MAGA they'll just join in, if they're not they're dangerous antifa terrorists and it's god trumps divine order to ruin their lives.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

You don't need Russian hackers when Trump is a Russian asset.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That will take Putin.

Why do people assume a guy on the opposite side of the world has more leverage than the majority party of the country the case is happening in?

I swear to God, you wouldn't even know the GOP base exists the way people talk

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I assume "a guy on the opposite side of the world" has a huge hacker army at his disposal.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Either Russian software and networking IT folks are a generation ahead of their American peers, our army of hackers (ie, the NSA - the world's largest employer of Mathematician PhDs) is completely asleep at the switch, or the call is coming from inside the house.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

TIL, Putin is Chinese and the Southern District of New York jury pool is a pipeline company.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying the NSA could definitely catch Russian hackers hacking into the New York State criminal justice system computers but not catch Chinese hackers hacking into our national infrastructure?

Sounds like the NSA isn't very good at its job.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 1 points 10 months ago

So you’re saying the NSA could definitely catch Russian hackers hacking into the New York State criminal justice system

I'm saying that if I had to put money down on who will be outing a member of the Trump jury on my bingo card, I'd put a lot more dollars on "MAGA New Yorker who works at the New York State criminal justice office" than "Guy with a laptop in Moscow".

[–] themeatbridge 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The judge has since specifically prohibited press from disclosing employer information, so it seems les s likely.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lol, you think the judge issuing a stern warning will stop it? I bet it's Trump's legal team leaking the info.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 10 months ago

Wouldn't be the first New York Don to leverage jury intimidation as a court strategy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Not like some of those press people are on trumps side or anything. sideyes fox,

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

What the fuck

[–] Pretzilla 6 points 10 months ago

Jessie Waters on Faux News, it should be noted

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Literally talks about it already happening in the article.

[–] Darkard 45 points 10 months ago

Won't take long for the media to start slandering them I'm sure.

But in all seriousness, I hope they are being given some measure of protection considering how rabid Trumps supporters get.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 9 points 10 months ago

I've got a spot bet on at least three of them being accused of pedophile conspiracies before the case is done

[–] ITypeWithMyDick 29 points 10 months ago (4 children)

And will only take one Maga thumper to make a hung jury

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's what the backups are for. You can have a hung jury but the others can boot one person out. It's happened on a jury my wife was on and then they just brought in the backup and continued as normal

[–] Evilcoleslaw 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, even once deliberation starts if it's clear you're just in there not deliberating in good faith they'll tell the judge and they can boot you and assign an alternate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

No shit? I didn't know they could do that. I thought backups were only for if someone got sick or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Might be more than one in there. They ask you all sorts of questions to see if you would be biased, most people would be truthful but there's a certain type of person who doesn't have any qualms about lying and it's the same type that reevers the defendant here.

[–] pelya 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They were supposed to select jurors based of no allegiance to the defendant.

[–] ITypeWithMyDick 15 points 10 months ago

In an ideal world, yup

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

Popcorn engaged

[–] Bonesince1997 21 points 10 months ago

Please keep arms and legs inside at all times