this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
670 points (97.5% liked)

News

23645 readers
4255 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagingRobot 128 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Yeah but we wanted to work from home not hybrid bullshit. This story is pandering like we won but they are still forcing me to go to an office every week for no good reason. This is just propaganda. The whole conversation in the thread has even shifted from talking about working at home full time to hybrid being ok. Insane

[–] mPony 28 points 8 months ago

hear hear. Offices are outmoded, office managers are outmoded, paying for parking is outmoded.

All of it is horseshit, and like horseshit should be deposited indiscriminately and walked away from without looking back.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 109 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

the place I work has tried RTO policies several times now - with very limited success. well over 90% of all white collar jobs can be done from wherever you can get internet so your VPN software will function. the customer facing part of the business has to be there 100% of the time, they dont have a choice, that's how the business model is designed. I go in a few days a week but honestly dont ever actually need to be there. maybe 2 days a month, tops, is my presence absolutely required.

the really interesting bit, which the article didnt touch on (not much of an article to begin with) is that there is a commercial real-estate bubble. the big buildings in the downtown business district/cores of most cities, that real-estate isnt worth much if there's no one renting the space. businesses that used to rent the space no longer need to because all of their employees work from home now. the people who invested in those big buildings are not seeing a return on their investments - and they are unhappy. that is, imho, a big driver behind the RTO movement.

[–] seaQueue 46 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

the people who invested in those big buildings are not seeing a return on their investments - and they are unhappy. that is, imho, a big driver behind the RTO movement.

And those people are largely of the same class as the corporate executives and shareholders pushing RTO policies which ties a nice little bow on top of the whole situation. Rich people are losing money when employees work from home and so WFH has to go.

[–] Altofaltception 22 points 8 months ago (24 children)

Given the housing crisis, it only makes sense to convert that real estate into residential units.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon 96 points 8 months ago (7 children)

I offered to work from home yesterday because I have bronchitis and no voice, so I told my manager it was that or I go off sick and stay there until I deem I feel better, that half a loaf was better than none, and she said "well I don't want to set a precedent", so I told her that I was sick then and won't be back until I feel better. I'm the only one who can do my job, so she's right fucked. She's like an alien wearing a skin suit trying to pretend to human.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"I don't want anyone to realize they can work just as effectively from home. Sure it saves them gas and commute time, but it just doesn't pump my ego if I cannot micromanage in person."

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Precisely. So she shot herself in the foot and I had a day to recover. I might call off Monday too.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon 14 points 8 months ago

I'm at urgent care right now actually to try to get some better puffers or a nebulizer or something. I might just.

[–] RagingRobot 25 points 8 months ago

Seems like she did set a precedent anyways haha just a worse one than before

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The manager doesn't get to make the decision. She's probably going to have to go argue with her manager that also likely has no control. Stand your ground, they don't want to fight on this hill. -source, a people manager of hybrid teams at a company that insisted on on-site.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Her manager would say yes and not care. It's my direct manager just being micro managery.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 8 months ago (25 children)

Which leads to the question, and its an honest question and I would benefit from the honest answer: If I can do the job hybrid, why can I not do the job remote? Is it because you needed me to move some paper boxes to the printer?

[–] comador 41 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In my 20 years of working in the office and an additional 4 working 100% WFH, I'll throw my worthless internet opinion out there as to why: It comes down to the culture of the company.

Some companies see a real benefit from water tank conversations, face-to-face meetings, and the ability for managers to ask someone in person on a moment's notice to do things. There is also a lack of trust in the employees being able to perform correctly without physical oversight in many companies. Granted and aside from the trust issue, there is some truth to that, but can in fact be realigned with the exact same benefit by retooling communications. It's up to each company however to formulate the best course of action to remedy that and many sadly fail, resulting in RTO mandates.

[–] partial_accumen 39 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Some companies see a real benefit from water tank conversations

There are real benefits to water cooler spontaneous talk. However, they don't overcome the detriments to having all your staff commute all the time on the off chance one will occur to produce a positive result.

face-to-face meetings, and the ability for managers to ask someone in person on a moment’s notice to do things.

These are largely dead in hybrid scenarios, because those that would be meeting face to face don't work in the office on the same day. So the practical result to hybrid is the worker loses productivity from the commute to come into the office for one or two days an sits at a desk alone all day in video meetings with their coworkers just like they'd do at home. The next day their coworker does the same while the original worker is WFH that day.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

These are largely dead in hybrid scenarios, because those that would be meeting face to face don’t work in the office on the same day.

I work at an office that started hybrid after covid because enough employees quit when they went to full RTO. The IT department ended up with 2 days in and 3 days remote, but the 2 days are the same for everyone so that we are all in the office at the same time for the spontaneous conversations.

It works pretty well. 2 days to collaborate and keep up relationships, the other three days to get individually completed work done.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Water tank conversations really fuck with remote workers because they are always missing something, but if you can manage to redirect all work talk to happen in whatever communication tool the company uses, everyone tends to work better in the end, as nobody misses anything. But the only way I've seen companies successfully do this is by adopting remote-first approaches - when people only go to the office like once a month if even that.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Defeated? Wasn't the aim full WFH?

[–] SonnyVabitch 86 points 8 months ago (26 children)

Hybrid is a compromise that makes no sense to either party. The company still has to maintain an expensive office while being limited to the talent pool within commutable distance. The employee still has to waste countless (albeit fewer) hours travelling while being limited to job opportunities within ~20 miles of their residence.

[–] alpacapants 32 points 8 months ago (9 children)

We have hybrid and it actually really works. We hire countrywide and if you don't live near an office you are fully remote. But if you do live near an office you can go in anytime. I don't like going to the office, but if I need to print or ship, or need to meet a client or coworker it's nice to have the option. Also anytime I have an issue, I can pop in the office to check out new hardware, or work if my home is unsuitable due to whatever ( power outage, noisy maintenance, over 90 degrees since we don't have AC, sick kid). However, I think hybrid only works if there is no minimum requirement on time in office. If it is at the teams discretion the home office becomes an amenity. We also downsized from something like 200 cubes to around sixty, so that helps too.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago

I think hybrid only works if there is no minimum requirement on time in office.

Then it's not really hybrid, it's actually fully WFH with the option to come in. Hybrid forces you to come in.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

I would call that "remote first" to avoid ambiguity. My current employer is like that too, with offices or co-working spaces in select major cities around the world.

The key differentiating factor is that you can go into the office if you feel like it. It's only "hybrid" in the sense that you decide, on a purely personal whim, whether you want to or not.

Personally, I live fairly close to a big office, but have only go in for big yearly meetings. And with a remote first culture no one bats an eye at that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DacoTaco 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (12 children)

Hybrid does make sense. There are people who work better in an office ( like myself ) and there are people who are better working from home ( like my coworker ). The company i work for believes hybrid is the way to go so that you can supply an office for people like me, but also hire people who work remotely. However, nobody is saying you need to have an office that can house 100% of you employees. 60% is good enough as not everyone will be in the office at the same time. Money saved!

That said, some meetings are better to have in person so once in a while a required in person meeting is needed.

I believe in the words of my company : everyone, everywhere. And that includes an office or, which has happened, from working from spain, germany or thailand which are all remote locations in no way connected with the company. These were people who legit lived abroad or were looking after a vacation home of a friend

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 8 months ago (9 children)

There are a lot of great ones in here, but there's another perspective I think should be added. For a long time, employees have been commoditized. We're resources. Interchangeable. And that gives companies tremendous power.

WFH puts us on more even footing. There are entire cities supported by a single industry or even company. Now we aren't limited geographically in who we can work for. If you're toxic to work for, we can leave. It saps the power of the leadership to say "my way or the highway."

I don't think this is the secret underlying reason. I agree it's real estate values that are mainly driving it, but I think this is absolutely part of it. Toxic leaders (and every company has them) are finding people are less willing to tolerate their bullshit because they aren't over a barrel to the same degree. Still need universal healthcare to really break their back.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

Yeah for quite some time I have been saying labor is priced artificially low. All of the barriers to finding a new job while working. All the risks of even short-term unemployment. Workers are already fucked by the power imbalance but without any liquidity in the labor market it's so much worse. WFH adds liquidity, they hate it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 58 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I worked hybrid 18 at home, 22 at the office and it sucked.

It showed me three things:

• It showed me that I was far more productive when I was at home and I was comfortable and not distracted.

• It showed me that I was coming into the office for absolutely no logical reason (even while there, all discussion was via Slack and Zoom).

• It showed me that the company's leadership was incompetent.

This wasn't even a 'we paid for the space, we have to use it' issue. This was an office job at a light industrial facility where no one had to be in the office. If they didn't have us come in, they could have knocked down the office area and put in another line or two. Just incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I treat office days as social days for exactly this reason. I know I'm not getting anything done, there are too many distractions, so I MUST be being forced to come into this disaster zone for one reason - to recharge. So that's what I do.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago

I told my boss that I get less done in the office. The temperature is always wrong. The monitors aren't as good as what I have as home. There's distractions. So many distractions. Sales guys are loud. People walking up to you. You can't ignore a person standing next to you like you can ignore a slack message.

I told him I'd go in, but it would be a day of bullshitting and not doing much work.

Fortunately, he hasn't really pushed the issue since. If the CEO gets the idea in his head again it's going to be conflict.

What I'd really like to do is form a union, but labor in the US is extremely weak.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 8 months ago

Our company is doing the opposite and forcing everyone to RTW 5-days a week. Can’t wait for the exodus and the “I told you so”

[–] 9point6 35 points 8 months ago

ITT people with drastically different ideas of what hybrid is.

Why do I feel like the next phase of this is changing the expectations of hybrid to be more like "9 in the office, 1 day from home"

[–] [email protected] 35 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A smart CEO can downsize the office space and save money, thereby increasing his profits.

[–] Mikelius 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The problem is they signed long office space leases and breaking out of them is very expensive, plus they get tax breaks for driving foot traffic to commercial areas. Not that they would ever admit that is the reason instead if a bullshit “team spirit” diatribe excuse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Did we actually believe any of them at the time? I think they already knew that remote work was going to continue, and they were trying to get as much money out of the transition as possible.

One problem was that they had wasted real estate, and they had to justify it to shareholders. So they pretended that they were going to bring everyone back to the office.

If you think about it from a medium run perspective, of course employers are going to want more remote work because then they don't have to pay for utilities or parking or rent or buildings. Of course this depends on the exact setup, but for many businesses it was clear from the beginning of the pandemic where things were going to go. And if we want to get even more cynical, we can point out that when your labor pool spans the country or even the world, you have a greater ability to underpay employees.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lemminary 28 points 8 months ago
[–] phoneymouse 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hybrid isn’t good enough

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RalphFurley 26 points 8 months ago (2 children)

My wife works in a large suburban office park off a major highway. The company designs hardware so obviously they have people in the workshop on-site etc, but you could remove three of their office buildings and keep those people at home. She also flies out from the east coast to the west coast twice a year just to sit in a conference room for two days straight.. it's like no one has ever heard of Zoom.

I've been working from home for nearly a decade and a half now. It has enabled me to keep my job after moving halfway across the country. I have dinner ready when the wife and kids get home, the laundry done, and can go for a jog at the local park for a few laps when I want to and yet I still get shit done and do a great job.

It just absolutely baffles me that CEOs aren't chomping at the bit to downsize their office space footprints, get off those leases or sell off their properties, and let everyone work from home.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have dinner ready when the wife and kids get home, the laundry done, and can go for a jog at the local park for a few laps when I want to and yet I still get shit done and do a great job.

You are so much more not-lazy than I am. Going for a jog after work? I salute you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArbiterXero 22 points 8 months ago

In other news…

“we lied and tried to force RTO because we wanted people to quit so we could avoid the bad-press of layoffs. They didn’t quit, we had to do layoffs to keep the stock price up because as a ceo I’m paid in shares. We’re done the layoffs for now and we enjoy skipping out on rent for office space.”

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There's always a push, we just need to push back harder.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

They're not "defeated". They got exactly what they wanted. People leaving without having to lay them off through attrition.

Now that they think they have "right-sized" their workforce at no cost, they nicely offer to concede hybrid working to keep the rest of their employees.

load more comments
view more: next ›