this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
325 points (98.5% liked)

World News

37322 readers
3319 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The US will send $300m (£234m) in military weapons to Ukraine, including ammunition, rockets and anti-aircraft missiles, the White House has said.

The surprise announcement comes as a bill in Congress to send further aid to Ukraine stalls amid partisan debate.

The US shipment, the first in nearly three months, is intended to prevent Ukraine from losing ground to Russia.

National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said this aid "is nowhere near enough to meet Ukraine's battlefield needs".

"This ammunition will keep Ukraine's guns firing for a period, but only a short period," Mr Sullivan told reporters on Tuesday, adding that "it will not prevent Ukraine from running out of ammunition."

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ekybio 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Partisan Debate?

You mean the GOP sabotaging Democracy again?

[–] feedum_sneedson 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

what the fuck has France got to do with it

[–] PigsInClover 2 points 3 months ago

Wasn’t expecting to laugh out loud here. Thank you for that

[–] twistypencil 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can someone explain if the white house can do this, why didn't they do it before and we had to wade through partisan nonsense?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The White House had a budget previously approved by Congress for Pentagon operations, and that budget was not fully expended due to internal cost savings, giving the WH room to reallocate some of it. But this is just a drop in the bucket, Congress needs to act on the larger support package and provide dedicated funds for the effort.

[–] TBi 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. Politically it may cause issues. Diplomacy is usually the best route.

[–] harderian729 -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wow, it's like you said nothing about anything.

You would make a great politician.

[–] Etterra 14 points 3 months ago

Stick an extra zero on that number and it might actually be enough.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The US will send $300m (£234m) in military weapons to Ukraine, including ammunition, rockets and anti-aircraft missiles, the White House has said.

The surprise announcement comes as a bill in Congress to send further aid to Ukraine stalls amid partisan debate.

National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said this aid "is nowhere near enough to meet Ukraine's battlefield needs".

The White House has been appealing to Congress for months to pass a budget that sends aid to Ukraine, as well as Israel and Taiwan.

Mr Johnson, an ally of Donald Trump, has said the House will vote on its own aid bill, but only after Congress passes a budget that overhauls the US immigration system.

Following the meeting, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk told reporters that he hopes Mr Johnson "is already aware that, on his individual decision, depends the fate of millions of people".


The original article contains 393 words, the summary contains 144 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!