this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
167 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18081 readers
3166 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) announced she will not seek reelection this year, avoiding an unpredictable three-way race in the swing state that had many national Democrats worried about holding onto the seat.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frickineh 48 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I didn't think she really ever intended to run again, which is why she was so brazen about burning every possible bridge to the ground. I assume she intends to get a bs job for one of the people who bought her.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

Yep, killing the $15 minimum wage will get her a nice job at some corporate think thank.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I agree, it is a gift link... it feels like Christmas.

As a pan person can I just briefly express how disappointing it is that Kyrsten was our first bi senator? Fucking hell.

[–] mean_bean279 29 points 4 months ago

She wasn’t bi, she was buy. As in “you could buy me.” which we often found her happily being bought.

[–] logicbomb 9 points 4 months ago

"Bi" seems an apt description of her party affiliation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

I thought it was apt. She'd fuck you ~~over~~ regardless of gender.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] dirthawker0 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Some newspapers and online news sources require a paid subscription to read the article. Subscribers can create a link to the article so people who don't have a subscription can read it. There's a limit to how many gift links a subscriber can create, in the case of Washington Post it's 10 per month.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Thank you for the explanation. It's a term I've only seen recently and I've waited a little while to see if I could figure it out by context but that hadn't happened yet.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago

Good riddance

[–] jordanlund 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Somebody convinced her she wasn't going to win?

[–] FenrirIII 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Volkditty 2 points 4 months ago

Know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim 2 points 4 months ago

This would be my guess. Most of the polling showed her hurting Lake more than Gallego.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 19 points 4 months ago

What a piece of shit. Bye Felicia.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

She would have split the republican vote. This is bad news.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 16 points 4 months ago

That's precisely why she's dropping out. Her handlers did the math. Same reason No Labels is doing their bullshit. All the polling data says they would take more from the GOP, which is the exact opposite reason they even exist.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Sinema always reminded me of Sarah Paulson cosplaying as George Santos cosplaying as Sarah Paulson cosplaying as a politician.

[–] nothingcorporate 8 points 4 months ago

Alternative headline: Grocery decides too cash out.

[–] xc2215x 5 points 4 months ago

I am okay with this.

[–] sarcasticsunrise 3 points 4 months ago

And nothing of value was lost. Kick rocks barefoot you vile cunt of a woman

[–] Rapidcreek 2 points 4 months ago

Someone read the room.

[–] hperrin 2 points 4 months ago

[gift link]?

This is about Kirsten Sinema.

[grift link]