this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1300 points (98.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26949 readers
4301 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RampageDon 115 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Was that midterms? I know she doesn't get political, but I think she was just telling her fans to make sure they go out and vote. More voters scares certain political parties. That's my best guess anyway.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 9 months ago (1 children)

She endorsed Biden in 2020 and has spoken out about the end of Roe v Wade and the importance of abortion rights, so while she hasn't made it her personality her team is as clear as it can ever be for a billionaire.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

team

This shit needs to die.

[–] brygphilomena 51 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not just more voters. More "wrong" voters. Like young, black, and young black voters.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget the most dangerous "minority" of all, WOMEN

[–] TunaLobster 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

clutches pearls They wouldn't dare! faints

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

A movement to repeal the 19th amendment is rumbling underground, and Amy Coney Barrett will lead the way*

…I’m joking, but am I? Am I really?

*just as Thomas will be the one to write the leading argument to overturn Loving v. Virginia

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Remember when the crazies were considered alt right instead of mainstream right?

[–] anarchy79 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] QuaternionsRock 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The Overton Window is a fairly popular concept on Lemmy, and I haven’t the faintest idea why.

It’s easy to see why the Overton Window holds such appeal. For one thing, it offers a universal theory of change in an age of polarization and fracture. While Trump and the UK Independence Party pull right, and Sanders and Corbyn pull left, Overton’s concept suggests that the mechanism of change is the same. For another thing, it has the virtue of simplicity: Overton did little more than repackage the basic negotiating principle that if you ask for a lot, you will likely get more than if you ask for a little. And although the window offers a theory of change, its central element—the window itself—actually describes the norm from which reality has deviated. Zeynep Tufekci worries in The New York Times that Trump “voices truths outside the Overton Window,” while the British writer Sam Leith speculates that Corbyn may have positioned his party “dangerously far from the centre of the Overton Window.” The window serves as shorthand for the erstwhile consensus. Viewing politics through the Overton Window reinforces liberal notions about the moderate center, even as that center ground erodes.

For conservatives, by contrast, the Overton Window has always been about strategy. Though Overton himself never committed his most influential idea to paper, his Mackinac Center colleague Joe Lehman continued his work after Overton’s death in 2003 at age 43. Lehman not only coined the term “Overton Window,” he weaponized it, setting up training sessions on the concept for other right-leaning think tankers. The term filtered into the conservative blogosphere in 2006, when Josh Trevino enthused about the window as a tool for the right. “Step by step, ideas that were once radical or unthinkable—homeschooling, tuition tax credits, and vouchers—have moved into normal public discourse,” Trevino declared. “The conscious decision to shift the Overton Window is yielding its results.”

The concept did not reach a wider audience, however, until Glenn Beck cast Overton’s ideas as the bogeyman in his 2010 best-seller, The Overton Window. The villain of Beck’s tale is Arthur Gardner, an aging PR guru who plots to use the Overton Window to foist his own objectives (“criminalize dissent,” “reinforce dependence and collectivism”) on an unsuspecting and gullible public. In his afterword, Beck urges readers to watch out for manipulation in their own lives and to set their own priorities.

While Beck shared Overton’s libertarian ideology, he was wary of the window as a strategy for change, imagining a totalitarian left that could hijack it. Its elitist overtones also stuck in his craw: An early champion of the Tea Party, Beck preferred to extol the power of the American people, whereas Overton largely sought to influence policy-making from the top down by “educating lawmakers and the public.” At one point in his novel, Beck takes a veiled swipe at the somewhat otherworldly Mackinac Center, which was founded on an island in Lake Huron: Arthur Gardner’s son boasts that his father “stole the concept” of the Overton Window “from a think tank in the Midwest.”

https://newrepublic.com/article/138003/flaws-overton-window-theory

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ceenote 62 points 9 months ago (8 children)

It's even more embarrassing, though. The full-time pundits and career politicians pitching a hissy fit right now aren't alt-right incels. Whining about Taylor Swift is a coordinated strategy.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not the most useful distinction when the full-time pundits and career politicians in question are taking their cues from the alt-right incels. Certainly still an embarrassment though. This is not how the GOP (re?)gains its credibility among the sane.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Their goal isn't to win credibility with the sane. It's genocide. They want to exterminate or enslave anyone who disagrees because they know they'll never win back credibility.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think these media companies and personalities actually have any agenda beyond enriching themselves at this point

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Think about the "demographics shifts" rhetoric. They're straight up saying "if we don't murder or criminalize a bunch of people, we have no future." The only path to continuing to enrich themselves is terrorism and mass murder. Like, I agree, if saving puppies was profitable they'd be doing that instead but it's not.

Their only agenda is enriching themselves. It's just that that agenda happens to coincidence with "kill everyone else or they'll stop us from taking all the money."

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DigitalTraveler42 59 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Taylor Swift dressed as Hulk Hogan: "listen up all my Swifty-maniacs, I want you to smash the Fash and punch Nazis, oh and PS: fuck MAGA to death!"

[–] linearchaos 15 points 9 months ago

That's a whole new Era for her next tour.... :P

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] badaboomxx 58 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The onion is getring out of things to publish.

But yeah something that a couple of years appears to be insane now is a reality with the snowflake conservatives

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Not really, fiction has always had to be believable while reality doesn’t

Also onions have long been part of cuisines around the world

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 33 points 9 months ago

Mike Drucker

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Almost 6 my friend.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The best thing for the class war is internecine warfare among the upper class.

[–] anarchy79 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)

internecine

ˌɪntəˈniːsʌɪn

adjective

destructive to both sides in a conflict

This goes in my mind pocket!

Though I suppose this tactic works whichever class you belong to, and the upper one has the advantage right now by far.

* is there no way to get new line only on lemmy? It's either single line or dual line (all on one line or one on every second line)?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Remember the freaky guy who sued Swift for not performing one of his songs? That's what conservatives sound like lately about her.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HonoraryMancunian 9 points 9 months ago (13 children)

Why was she on the radar 5 years ago?

[–] IMongoose 19 points 9 months ago

I think that's when she endorsed some Tennessee Dems.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Apparently the 6'8, 260 lb future Hall of Fame professional footballer player she's dating is gay because.... she's over 30.

Also, she thinks things like women should have a choice over what happens to their bodies and that you should be allowed to use the name you like best so that's a problem too.

Totally sane and normal stuff.

[–] workerONE 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And she told people to go vote and the right really didn't like that

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago

Not even "vote Democrat," she just urged people to vote period. And linked to Vote.org encouraging people to research what would be on their ballot. The fact that the right takes this as an attack on them isn't surprising to anyone.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Funny thing is they're both the same age lul. Perfectly normal and reasonable for people to date people their own age. I guess the right just wants to date the cradle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anarchy79 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Apparently the 6’8, 260 lb future Hall of Fame professional footballer player she’s dating is gay because… she’s over 30.

It is sickening that it has stooped to this level. Just comprehend the number of bigoted points of view expressed there. I could write an essay on that.

It's almost diabolical how refined it is, how much time they took with it. I have been following the development of right wing propaganda for over two decades, and I never fail to get stunned over how blatant it is, and how well engineered.

I would highly recommend to read "Banana Republicans": https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/593702.Banana_Republicans

Once you see it, you can't unsee it. Then Manufacturing Consent is essential lore, but the hole goes deep. No other conspiracy theories needed- that is the conspiracy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

With the Kansas City Chiefs headed to Super Bowl LVIII, influential MAGA Media personalities have started circulating conspiracy theories about the pop superstar, promoting the deranged notion that she is part of a sprawling psychological operations plot staged by the NFL and Democratic Party to deliver the 2024 presidential election to President Joe Biden.

Mr. Kelce’s advertisements promoting Pfizer’s Covid vaccine and Bud Light

speculation that Ms. Swift is after Mr. Kelce for his money.

Some say he’s gay https://twitter.com/OwenBenjamin/status/1752422032187470011

I think you are caught up

Edit: Neat the Pentagon had to say it’s stupid

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/02/pentagon-to-maga-world-you-need-to-calm-down-over-taylor-swift-00139292

My favourite quote mentioned in that article courtesy of Fox News

“It’s real. The Pentagon psy-op unit pitched NATO on turning Taylor Swift into an asset for combating misinformation online,” Watters said.

Because apparently we want misinformation?

[–] c0mbatbag3l 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why the fuck would the billionaire Taylor Swift be after the millionaire Travis Kelce's money?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You say that like any other part of it makes sense

[–] c0mbatbag3l 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The others are conspiracy logic, basically "I don't know so I'm assuming X" but that last one just doesn't make any sense with known values of wealth.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›