I mean it still kinda works
Nah skip the old man in position #2
Same, but replace 'article' with 'comments'
You should be a professional quote maker
That guy needs executing
Fun fact! It's pronounced 'lattyboo-lar-tay'
(No need to double check)
Assume far more money is being spend on fire prevention, than what's currently lost in fire
For anyone reading this thinking that this may sound like a good rebuttal: it's a false equivalence.
Fire prevention is a worthwhile expenditure, because things being on fire when they shouldn't is generally very bad. The cost of fire prevention is worth it, especially when lives are at stake.
Benefit cheat-catching is (or at least should be) purely about net savings. What happens though is the costs outweigh the savings making them pointless, as well as hurting those in who accidently get caught in the net too.
Don't fall for specious arguments, folks! A pithy rebutally might sound convincing at first, but don't be afraid to think deeper about it. And don't be afraid to ignore the commenter if you believe they're arguing in bad faith.
People forget that trump did not run for president 3 times. He's run for president 5 times.
OOTL foreigner here. When were the other 2 times?
The atrocities being committed by Israel in Gaza only came up six times in more than 1,000 calls.
I guess what people have been saying about this perhaps weren't particularly true. Which leads me on to believe the misogyny line even more.
Seeing as this is a British brand, I'm not entirely convinced 'they knew'.
Bonus cutesy version: —
view more: next ›
Men and girls?