this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
500 points (96.3% liked)

News

25178 readers
3957 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 129 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow, 60 years on and they're still raiding gay bars. Can't express how profoundly depressing that is.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 year ago (24 children)

How's about investigating straight bars where dudes drug girls by sneaking GHB on their drinks or spend the night sexuality harassing and touching girls without their consent?

No, they gotta go after the assless chaps.

[–] somethingsnappy 35 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Show me chaps that aren't assless.

[–] Burn_The_Right 21 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Assful chaps are just pants.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

so, per a thing on NPR radio... it was 4 gay bars and 6 other establishments (presumably that serve alcohol.)

Not gonna say it wasn't harassment - cuz it was. There is and was a better way to handle it, even if the law needs to be enforced at all. I would suggest the purpose behind the law makes sense. I know Minneapolis handles the issue by not giving places that allow nudity liquor licenses, and from experience, drunken horndogs are some of the worst humans you've met.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] chemical_cutthroat 88 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lewd conduct? Nah, that's just locker room talk.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s consensual, that’s why Christian’s hate it.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO FEEL GUILT GOSH DARN IT!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I believe that the Seattle polices sent more retired officers and off duty officers to terrorize people on Jan 6 in DC than any other department in the country.

And let's remember the Washington State Police did nothing to stop protestors from storming the WA governor's mansion.

Seattle is a lovely place. The SPD work at ruining that regularly.

[–] postmateDumbass 13 points 1 year ago

Tear gassing the ciry council members was a signature moment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yesman 70 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The lewd conduct violations in question were related to clothing that exposed the buttocks and nipples of patrons, which is prohibited under state law in liquor establishments, he said, noting that, in his opinion, the law needed to change to be a reflection of today’s times.

Absolute horseshit. According to the Supreme Court, the pigs have no duty to uphold law, enforce court orders, or protect citizens. We've seen plenty refuse to enforce gun regulations and COVID restrictions recently. Don't ever believe them when they say they can't pick and choose what to enforce.

Castle Rock v. Gonzales

Warren v. District of Columbia

[–] afraid_of_zombies 11 points 1 year ago

Don’t ever believe them when they say they can’t pick and choose what to enforce.

Man the Supreme Court fucked up with that one. If the Executive branch can pick and choose that means it is taking on the duties of the other branches. Which breaks the entire concept of Checks and Balances. Who the hell wants that? Judges issue arrest warrants and cops are like "nah", legislation changes the law and law enforcement vetos it.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago

It is so goddamn depressing how far we've backslid on LGBTQ+ issues since 2016.

[–] kemsat 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it’s consensual between people of appropriate ages, then the government should have absolutely nothing to say or do.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 18 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Weird how the party of freedom and the party of small government wants to take away so many freedoms and put so much government between you and everything else, huh?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What a waste of resources. These cops could have been looking for actual crimes instead of this bullshit. Wishful thinking, I know.

[–] Madison420 9 points 1 year ago

Something actually risky? They don't get paid enough for that!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpiceDealer 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I expect to see this shit go down somewhere like Alabama or my home state of Tennessee or even Utah but Seattle? I thought Seattle was one of these "progressive" cities. What the fuck is going on?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It was more than just gay clubs visited all under enforcing liquor laws which begs the question, is this a top priority for Seattle society as surely those same police personnel could have been working on real issues as surely naked nips and exposed ass pants are doing little society harm. Meanwhile, a few more drunk drivers never got stopped. That is the real crime here. Seattle police are distracted with low priority issues. Is this ok with the people living there?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

SPD has "limited value" to the small biased sample of locals I know. They're very unpopular in some communities, especially queer/minority communities around where these inspections took place. But as always, many others aren't directly impacted and so they tend to be quietly neutral or supportive of the police.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast 28 points 1 year ago

They should checkout sniffies.com it's literally a map of guys wanting to fuck other guys. Maybe they can raid people's houses? That'll teach them to not want penises in their orifices right? They are probably drinking while doing it.

I feel like we need to start a m4m for Seattle on Lemmy or mastodon. I actually started r/Seattlegay in reddit but then they banned me. Assholes. Hey if there's such a thing already I would love to partake.

[–] jordanlund 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seattle? 🤔😕🤔😕🤔😕🤔

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The authorities in Seattle are brutal to any non-white/non-wealthy people, it doesn't surprise me at all they would also be brutal on non-cishet peoples as well... I think the old money still hates that it turned into a melting pot and the do everything they can to prevent social mixing of classes and races

[–] jordanlund 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The reaction by the liquor board is just bizarre too:

"The lewd conduct violations in question were related to clothing that exposed the buttocks and nipples of patrons, which is prohibited under state law in liquor establishments"

Well, you better be ready to show your citations for all the titty bars or you can shut right the fuck up about your "violations".

https://m.yelp.com/search?cflt=stripclubs&find_loc=Seattle%2C+WA

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oddly enough, in Washington state strip clubs do not serve booze. You can have nudity or alcohol, but not both.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] b3an 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

So for lewdness, they should raid these kinds of places too right?

Cowgirl Espresso Washington

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Occupied Duwamish Territory?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] nifty 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is this enough motivation to get people out to vote this election? Wtf Seattle!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i feel like this has happened more than a few times in seattle in recent years.

Yall good?

[–] nutt_goblin 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

OKAY, time for some clarification as a Seattle local:

  • This was NOT an isolated incident. The Cuff Complex, which was one of the bars that got raided, had been raided so many times in the past the owner had to put up a sign warning customers not to wear jockstraps because of the heavy enforcement (which ironically caused him to lose even more business because everyone was pissed at the owner for "policing bodies")

  • Gay bars were being targeted disproportionately to straight bars. Remember, there are a LOT more straight bars than gay bars. Raiding 4 gay bars covers a sizable chunk of all the gay bars in Seattle, but raiding 14 straight barsis a relative drop in the bucket.

  • A gay cabaret club owner crunched the numbers and found his establishment was raided 1,550% more than the average liquor licensee. The owner of the Cuff also owns another gay bar and a regular straight bar. His two gay bars are frequently raided, while the straight bar has NEVER been raided.

  • The board that enforces liquor laws is the LCB. Two funny facts: First, the rule against lewd conduct was created by... The LCB, not the state legislature. Second, the LCB stands for the Liquor and Cannabis board, which means that they are already ignoring a law when it suits their purpose (the federal prohibition against cannabis).

  • Finally, after the gay community collectively tore the LCB a new asshole during a board meeting earlier this week, the LCB reversed course and basically said "ah shit we fucked up" and is suspending enforcement of its lewd conduct rules. I strongly recommend this Mastodon thread from someone who attended the meeting, it's truly a thing of glory and demonstrates just how close the LCB was to getting slapped with a discrimination lawsuit: https://partyon.xyz/@nullagent/111851872885551640

load more comments
view more: next ›