this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
937 points (98.1% liked)

me_irl

4792 readers
209 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crow 104 points 11 months ago (12 children)

I wish more people shared the sentiment of just wanting a home and not an investment. I don’t care how much my house goes up or down in speculative value.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 11 months ago (9 children)

The problem with a collapse in house prices is that it normally comes with a collapse in everyone's personal finances.

If you can't afford before a crash, there's a very good chance you won't be able to afford after a crash either.

The only thing that will bring house prices down is building a fuckload more houses, and building them in places that people actually want to live.

[–] PoliticalAgitator 64 points 11 months ago

You could also introduce regulations to prevent houses being used as investments.

[–] Coreidan 41 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The reason houses are expensive is because investment firms are buying them up with cash.

There are entire neighborhoods owned by investment firms. A lot of these homes are empty and are just used to prop up housing costs.

The issue isn’t supply, it’s policy. The issue is reckless monetary policy combined with banks/investment firms controlling the market.

If you want cheaper housing building more isn’t the answer. The real answer is banning corporations from owning homes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I've seen the idea thrown about to tax houses higher the more a single entity owns. IDK about the feasibility of that plan, but we need to do something. I feel like it would never happen, though, because rich people and, by extension, lawmakers own multiple homes and they wouldn't want to lose money.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No that won't fix it. Not completely anyway. All houses are being bought up by international multi billion dollar investment firms who then proceed to rent out those houses for more than they're worth, driving up rent prices. Here in Vancouver, Canada, rent prices are beyond ridiculous, and have nothing to-do with what the units are actually worth. If you want to stop that, prohibit companies from owning houses, dead stop. Increase taxes on second, third, and fourth houses exponentially, making it only interesting for a single person to have one, maaaaybe two houses.

With that, houses will become eligible to buy again at normal prices

[–] Fedizen 7 points 11 months ago

I mean I was looking out a window in seattle the other day and at least half the rooms in buildings I could see looked empty. I do think there needs to be more laws to punish landlords that have too many vacant units as well.

[–] EnderMB 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There was a great video years ago that detailed what would happen if house prices were to rise, fall, or stay stagnant.

You're right, if they were to crash, we'd all be a lot poorer, but there would also be a lot of (still) cash-rich people that would happily buy up all the cheap stock, and we'd be in an even worse position than before. We'd build more houses, but we'd ultimately create new billionaires, and given the low quality of some new builds, probably a two-timer system of ownership where the poors get the new houses on flood lands/with dodgy cladding, and the rich live in good builds.

The best thing to happen overall is a price cap per-area, dropping by a percent every year or two, with subsidies on sustainable renting (low rent fees, buildings being up to code, etc). The landlords that use their property as investments will bail right away, renters will see the market switch to their favour, and through legislation you could probably push rent-to-sell options for those that maintain homes and want to release over several years.

More homes need to be built, but that also means more infrastructure, and building all of this without selling those houses to the highest bidder. That all takes time, at a time where there are a lot of cash-rich people that would love more investment.

[–] Smoogs 5 points 11 months ago

And doing away with Airbnb

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, "investors" are buying up properties as fast as they hit the market. The collapse isn't for a while.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 11 months ago

Using your comment to add: never forget Jeff Bezos is now in the game of buying up single family homes to rent out…Try to push your local government to make this shit illegal.

A people can never revolt if they’re too busy, stressed, uneducated and financially weighed down. Whether you believe in the Four Turnings or not, just imagine if you had enough money to accelerate such events, just for profit, just to strengthen your control…

Eat the rich.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Yet another piece of evidence that “xennial” is a real thing. I was born in 1978 and I’m hoping for a collapse in real estate values. I just want a place where I can spend time making it comfortable without the constant awareness that I’ll have to move eventually.

[–] Anamnesis 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was born in 86 and I've resigned myself to never owning a house because it's basically impossible unless I want to live in the middle of nowhere or I completely change careers. Four jobs isn't enough for a house anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MudSkipperKisser 9 points 11 months ago

Hey fellow xennial! It’s very much a real designation and I’m so glad it’s been defined. I’ve never fit genx or millennial exactly, definitely a combo of both

[–] Blue_Morpho 5 points 11 months ago

I’m hoping for a collapse in real estate

It's not going to happen. The last crash was 2008. Prices went down 30% which didn't come close to offsetting the increases from the previous run up.

https://dqydj.com/historical-home-prices/

At best there might be a long term oversupply from boomers dying. That would put long term pressure to lower prices. So if you wait 25 years you could have a house priced at what a house was 5 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Millennial here, bought a house in late 2022, process were not low, but interest was (this was right before all the inflation nonsense that's plagued the market in the past year or so). Locked in for 3 years.

I don't care if my overpriced home drops in value. The value we get from owning it is the only thing we care about, and we have no intention of leaving or selling it. So I'm in support of a big crash; unfortunately unless something serious happens I'm not sure that we'll get a crash.

Every time something inexpensive hits the market it's snatched up by some investor or something; so the only homes left for normal buyers are overpriced. The businesses that are buying these properties are creating an artificial scarcity and leaving homes empty until they can either rent them for more than they're worth, or sell it at an incredible markup.

I can see this in action in the neighborhood I live in now. Two new homes were built and they're up for sale. Naturally I was curious. They both have less floor space, fewer bedrooms, and overall they're not nearly as valuable, but the market price that's listed for them is more than double the price we paid for our home less than a block away.

The stupid thing is that they'll eventually sell probably at that price or something close to it. My home's value will probably go up by proxy, but honestly, I could not possibly care less. The whole thing is stupid, and unreasonable for normal buyers. They're modest homes; new, sure, but not special. There's nothing notably better or variable about the houses. They just cost more.

I'm angry about it. I want families to be able to buy a home. The amount we paid was more than we would normally have been able to afford. We pooled our finances to afford the mortgage, and we're still struggling to find a balance so that we don't financially sink trying to afford it. Our situation aside, it should be easier. Others should be able to do it without having to pool resources with others to make it work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

I am also a millennial but fortunately I was able to buy at a decent interest and a decent price. 3 months after I bought my house interest rates skyrocket and so did the value of the house. It's not the best house but it's perfect for me. It's kind of run down and my mom hates it but it's home. My mom says I should sell it now that it's worth more but then I asked her where am I going to be able to find a house this cheap anymore? I absolutely hated renting and I'm not a fan of landlords. It does upset me that these large companies are buying up all these properties. Businesses should not own residential homes. PERIOD. I also think the government needs to far more strict on landlords. I was fortunate to have a decent landlord for the 13 years I rented but I've heard all the horror stories.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gmtom 28 points 11 months ago

Yep and all the banks are waiting as well, so they can buy even more properties to rent out.

[–] MisterChief 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Trying to help my mother in law. Low income, no savings, some debt we've tried to help to pay off. Starter homes are over $200k now. 6-7 years ago these are the same houses that were $110-140k. She can't afford the down payment, hell the bank won't pre-approve her to even put a bid in. Crazy. And yeah, as others have said, the price won't go down because any discount will be immediately snatched up, more often by a large investment firm, thus locking the price and not allowing the market to cool.

To provide some context, she wants a very basic home. A small yard primarily to start a garden, maybe 800-1000 sq ft on the high end, and not much more. The only places she and we can find that are in her range are in rough neighborhoods we wouldn't want her living. And also her work, which is 100% remote, constantly threatens return to office requirements which forces her in a 40 mile vicinity.

As melinneals, we got lucky. Purchased at literally the very beginning of covid (3.20) and have seen our home value skyrocket (+50% from purchase price). Rental homes in the neighborhood regularly charge 90% over our mortgage + property tax + home insurance rate. A house down the street (we got to know them as we both had young puppies) was abandoned because they raised the price +20% in the time the family lived there. It was a mother, both adult children and their spouses, and grandchild, 7 in total, in a 4 bedroom. They left one day and last I saw was an $8k bill taped to the door for 3 months of unpaid rent, they had moved out 4 months prior.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I managed to buy at the bottom of the interest rates, but before prices truly skyrocketed.

Because of some other life circumstances, I ended up having to move a few months back and finances just weren't there to hold onto it.

Having to rent again has been the most mental health destroying financial back step I think I could have ever taken. I pocketed a nice chunk of change, but it'd only be enough for a ~5% down payment in the current town.

Hoping to get back to owning some day, but not hopeful that that day will be soon.

[–] partial_accumen 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

she wants a very basic home. A small yard primarily to start a garden, maybe 800-1000 sq ft on the high end, and not much more.

...and...

And also her work, which is 100% remote,

100% remote? Seek out former industrial cities that have been devastated by American manufacturing coupled decline with population decline.

This one is one hour outside Pittsburgh and 1.5 hours outside of Cleveland. So you're still close two a couple sizable international airports, theaters, museums with great food scenes. Both cities host large Universities so you're close to a fairly highly educated population.

[–] hark 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If only you had read a bit more to see that her work keeps threatening return to office.

[–] partial_accumen 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I saw it. Lots of orgs are threatening. Very few have actually acted on it. I wanted that poster to have the info about options.

[–] MisterChief 9 points 11 months ago

You're not wrong. I appreciate the info. That's exactly what she's looking for. Thank you for looking. We're always on the lookout.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And if she's already working from home she probably has skills she can apply to other remote jobs. I say start applying now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

If thisbis his mother in law i am gonna assume she is in her 50's to 60's. It's hard to get an office job at that age since she likely isn't too far away from retirement age

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What do you mean by "hanging young puppies"? I'm very concerned

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SlopppyEngineer 21 points 11 months ago (5 children)

There is a strong correlation between unaffordable homes and people voting strong men and far right. It's a policy choice to stop the "homes as an investment", a policy that advantages the rich the most. But that policy choice determines where society will go.

Where I live, they're now taxing people that own properties where nobody lives. It won't be enough, but we'll see.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Smoogs 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good luck .. genx have been waiting as well

[–] Anticorp 11 points 11 months ago

For our whole lives. Of course we saw a massive crash in 2008, but we also lost our jobs and all of our money, and most of us couldn't capitalize on it.

[–] Coreidan 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s never going to collapse.

[–] robocall 8 points 11 months ago

That's the joke

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Supply and demand. House prices are high because lots of buyers are financially competing for the same properties. The prices won't collapse unless something disastrous happens to the world that results in an oversupply of housing or massively harms people's spending power, and the odds are you would be affected by that too.

[–] baronofclubs 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There are currently 10 million vacant homes across the US, (15 million if you count the ones for rent,) which represents about 7.5% of the total housing. Not refuting your argument, just adding to the conversation.

I guess a lot of these are in less than desirable locations, among other factors, but 4.5 million of them are listed as seasonal, occasional, or recreational use. That's a lot of vacant housing, considering only 1.2 million of them are for sale.

Edit, I guess these are 2020 numbers so these may have changed since then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just need boomers to die off. That'll get some houses on the market.

[–] Agent641 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We never should have talked them out of eating horse de-wormer

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

A large supply of affordable housing, say like the kind provided by a government dedicated to alleviating the housing crisis, would surely help.

It's not like there's nothing we can do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you want to make the market crash, you gotta make renting look like a poor investment. Like what if rental units had a high chance of catching fire or something? That would be a shame wouldn't it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›