this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
233 points (98.7% liked)

News

23181 readers
4004 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

South Korea’s parliament passed a bill Tuesday banning the breeding and slaughter of dogs for consumption, ending the traditional yet controversial practice of eating dog meat after years of nationwide debate.

The bill received rare bipartisan support across South Korea’s divided political landscape, highlighting how attitudes toward eating dog have transformed over the past few decades during the country’s rapid industrialization.

The law will ban the distribution and sale of food products made or processed with dog ingredients, according to the corresponding committee of the National Assembly.

However, customers who consume dog meat or related products will not be subject to punishment – meaning the law would largely target those working in the industry such as dog farmers or sellers.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 months ago (7 children)

There's a hypocracy for many of us judging this but snaking down on bacon or burgers

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

I don't know if you meant "snacking" but I got a chuckle imagining me slithering around with a gigantic belly filled with bacon cheeseburgers.

[–] MisterNeon 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I ain't a hypocrite. I'm a vegetarian because I hate animals.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You hate animals thus avoid them at all costs?

[–] MisterNeon -1 points 9 months ago

All costs, no that would make me a crazy person. Move across the street instead of walking past at least two dogs, absolutely.

[–] stoly 8 points 9 months ago

LOL you fully offended 10 people at the time of this comment. People get as snowflakey around meat as they do around guns.

[–] TrickDacy 5 points 9 months ago

I guess but it's human nature to be biased toward people and animals you have experience with. The idea of killing a dog for any non-mercy reason is repellent to me and there's no issue with that. I would prefer not to eat animals at all but I tried and it's quite difficult for me to avoid entirely so now I'm probably 80% vegetarian. If that's HyPoCrIsY, okay.

[–] fireweed 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In terms of "pigs have comparable intelligence and awareness to dogs, and thus if consuming a dog is wrong because they're intelligent then so is consuming a pig," or "a life is a life no matter the species," yes this tracks.

However a single nureongi (a common dog breed in the Korean dog meat industry) only weighs 40-55lbs whereas a single pig will usually weigh 250-325lbs at slaughter. After the butchering process, the amount of edible meat is reduced for both, but proportionally speaking much more is lost per-animal from the dog.

"Amount of suffering/number of lives per pound of meat" feels like a crass discussion, however given that a majority (and in many countries, a vast majority) of people consume an omnivorous diet (and are highly resistant to switching to strict vegetarianism/veganism), it's perhaps an unavoidable discussion.

[–] NegativeInf 2 points 9 months ago

It's honestly a good calculus, however dark. I wonder how it might compare across protein sources?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

It totally is. We seemingly just hate cows, pigs and chicken, but love cats'n'dogs.

And for simple-minded people it's always easy and morally fulfilling to care for other people's "injustices". Like being contra whale-hunting while not knowing where whales even live 😁

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago

And for the remaining 90% of people there isn't, because that's how subjective cultural values work.

[–] xc2215x 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A good move by South Korea.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's just optics. Dog meat was only eaten by the absolute poorest in South Korea, the fascist Yoon administration just wanted an easy win. Morally and economically, there's no benefit to banning dog meat over beef or pork, but because dogs are also pets it makes Yoon look better and can distract from him targeting minorities, disabled people, women, and ruining the economy.

Don't get me wrong, I'd rather no dogs get eaten, but this was just a cheap shot to make a fascist look better.

Is it a good thing? Ultimately, yes, but it's helpful to analyze the context. President Yoon is a fascist with declining popularity and banned something that was already pretty much nonexistent except in the absolute poorest areas.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Easy win? The article says it's been in controversy to get something like this passed for years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not because there are a bunch of dog-eating supporters, it was almost entirely gone beforehand, only the poorest people were still eating dog. This wasn't some grand win for a fascist that happens to love dogs, but a move for political capital. There aren't cultural or traditional reasons to eat dog meat in SK.

It's like banning consumption of squirrel in America. It wasn't really happening and it doesn't solve much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I got news for you, buddy. I'm from the Midwest. I know several people who hunt and eat squirrel. Not because they're broke, either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They're in it for the thrill.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Almost year round hunting for them. Only two or three months a year it isn't squirrel season. Pick a nice day for a stroll in the woods with a light little 22 rifle and collect some dinner to grill while having a few beers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sooooo black market dog meat, anyone?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Dog meat was only eaten by the absolute poorest in South Korea, anyone who could afford more expensive meat was eating that instead. Dog meat isn't a delicacy.

[–] NegativeInf 1 points 9 months ago

It is now that it's banned. Supply curve inverted. Billionaires will have secret meetings to consume it in the dead of night, under shroud of darkness.

[–] Linkerbaan 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In Abrahamic religions the eating of carnivorous animals such as cats and dogs is banned. Why is North Korea following this though?

I thought this was just the West holding on to old tradition since people do eat pets like rabbits and birds.

[–] werefreeatlast -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So no dogs... Find a new source of COVID. Aha! Rat testicles! Ofcourse!

In the news... Breaking news update, New York needs more rats! Every since the Koreans stopped eating dogs and started chomping on rat balls the population has declined below the extinction levels required for federal protection. If you see a rat, report it weareabouts to the government.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The fuck are you on/on about...