politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
All those young women who didn't want to choose between old white guys now have a choice: someone who stands up for choice.
And you're going to have to debate a prosecutor.
You're going to look so weak and whiny either way.
You just had your best month.
It's all downhill from here.
And someday, not soon, but sooner than you want, you're going to hear more Guilty verdicts.
And despite the bandage on your ear, you're going to hear that loud clang when the cell door shuts.
Best of all, you'll be on the hard, small side of that door.
Alone.
I'm amused at the notion that Trump's "best month" includes getting shot at. I hope you're right and that all the rest of his months are worse than that!
Trump getting shot is the literal high point of his campaign. There will not be another event that had so much potential to turn his campaign around. If that demented diaper shitting fucknugget can't even get a sympathetic bump from getting a ballistic ear piercing, his campaign is doomed. Especially since his rhetoric change didn't last 20 minutes.
The weakest point of the Trump campaign is Trump himself. He’s a known quantity, and given the biggest shake-up in the last 40 years of presidential campaigns, he wasn’t able to keep up the “unity” facade for a single speech. Just a poor and certainly beatable politician.
I don't think anyone honestly believes he was shot.
His ear would be fucking gone.
He got it scratched and as unhealthy and old as he is, he has to be on blood thinners. A small scratch blleds like crazy, and the majority of his voters are probably on blood thinners so they know
This is just nitpicking. Being barely grazed still falls under the overarching umbrella of "gunshot wound", even if it doesn't conjure the same mental image as we'd normally have.
If a soldier on a battlefield gets barely nicked and goes "I think I got shot!" nobody is going to argue about the details.
THAT is known propaganda being pushed by Russian and Chinese bots.
Kindly refer to community rule #3.
I'm aware of that Rule but in this case there's actual research showing that this is disinformation being intentionally pushed by known bad actors.
I'll remove the offending 2nd sentence but it doesn't change anything.
Downvoted for referencing the community rules? This community is fucked. Truly fucked. I've already unsubscribed, but this is forcing my hand to outright block this shit hole.
I thought it was confirmed he was only grazed by a glass shard from a teleprompter, not the actual bullet?
That was reported by the police initially to two news agencies that have since retracted the articles.
I've seen rear video of the podium when he was shot. Neither teleprompter made a bobble
Please explain to me what you think happened that day.
Piece of glass shrapnel hit his ear.
I did see TMZ reported that but I never saw it confirmed. I think that's definitely plausible. The other poster is implying that the whole thing was fake, which at this point I think we can for sure rule out.
He scratched he'd his ear, I just said that in more detail...
What part are you coming infused about?
So he scratches his ear and a guy behind him drops dead. Wow, Trump really is a god.
You think a bullet passed thru his ear and killed someone?
Yes.
Reading this gave me good feels, thanks for the morning endorphins.
Kamala does seem like the type that would go hard on those fuckers if she gets in. Lets hope.
Oh my lord. That was beautiful.
Everyone seems really enthusiastic about the prospect of another debate, but I don't think Trump agrees to another debate. Why would he?
Harris just needs to tell everyone he's afraid to debate her.
His ego won't take it.
He should be afraid. Whatever fear he may have, it's probably not enough. Sleepy Ramblin' Don is no match for Harris! He's afraid of powerful black women. He's too chicken to take her on and too inadequate. He knows it. We know it. Poor weak stupid Don. Sad!
Especially if they lean into the race/gender aspects. Can you imagine how frothed up his base would be at the notion that he's scared to debate a black woman?
Yeah, he won't. The question is how much and in what way he bluffs. I'm sure his campaign is calculating how long he can wait to cancel before the debate time, without TV stations running the time slot anyway with just Harris.
It’s already on the books for Sept 10. If Donny turns tail, Kamala just gets an open platform with the whole country watching to lay out her platform and point out Trump isn’t there because he is incapable of forming a plan he can stand up and defend.
It’s a win-win for her, no matter what he does. His only hope is to play the game and not look like a fool…. Is that possible?
I'd like to see it personally. But you're right, it might not happen, he's already whining that he won't do it unless the venue is changed from. ABC to Fox News. We'll see what happens though.
Ego.
Should we review her record as a prosecutor?
As Putin would have it, it shall be done