twice-yearly
I wonder why they went with that, instead of saying bi-annually
twice-yearly
I wonder why they went with that, instead of saying bi-annually
Media needs to start informing everyone about his ties and political philosophies to Dark Enlightenment,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._Vance#Political_positions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Enlightenment
He straight up supports and is actively working towards absolute monarchism.
Harris just needs to tell everyone he's afraid to debate her.
His ego won't take it.
I absolutely can't WAIT for the next debate.
and Trump can't chicken out without looking like a Chump...
Even now, it says nothing about letting AI watch them.
Ok,
Show me a PCE-E board that can do inference calculations as fast as a 3090 but is less expensive than a 3090.
nah, we all make fun of the men's looks in the GOP just as much.
And really the only reason is because it's conservatives the hold such weird beauty standards to begin with.
It's more about pointing out their own hypocrisy than it is making fun of them
Well yeah, but 10x the price....
If these companies used youtube videos in a way that circumvented their revenue stream in any way, then yeah, absolutely that's a problem. But that's a completely different issue not related to who/what is consuming the video
does not make it permissible for a human to cause the LLM to train on that data without permission of the rights holder
Says who? These videos are out there for people (or things) to see.
If someone was playing some videos to train their dog to to respond to a noise, what business is that of the rights holder?
Show me were in the ToS over a year ago, where it says you're not allowed to train an AI on the video.
Rights holder can't control what people are using the video for. They can control when and how it's delivered, but not who's actually watching it.
You can use another Drone as a repeater base-station.