this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
313 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19176 readers
5029 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eran_morad 30 points 10 months ago

Fkn lol, I’m sure he’s good for it, and if not, trump will definitely help.

[–] 7u5k3n 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Okay I don't want to be cliche... But if they get paid 1/10th of that money I'll eat my hat*

  • it's a figure of speech. I'll not pay up fyi
[–] jordanlund 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's pretty clear, he doesn't have that kind of scratch and I think there are still lawsuits from the voting machine companies.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/rudy-giuliani-trial-net-worth-b2465068.html

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

He claims not to have that kind of scratch.

I'm skeptical there isn't a lot that's hidden, protected, in someone else's name, etc.

And even if he had it, I'm expecting an Alex Jones situation where he's able to avoid paying a ridiculous amount.

Still, I'm hopefull they'll at least be able to get a million each or something. And if Rudy G really does have to live a broke life from here on out, that'd be great.

Edit:. Also, there is like zero chance that a guy made as much money as he did, and hung around the crowd he did, and didn't hide a bunch of it.

[–] ThePantser 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

So the courts just need to keep taking things away.

He's seen in a new fancy suit, court approaches and makes him take it off and put on a burlap sack.

He's seen dining at a nice restaurant, the court barges in and takes the steak away and replaces it with government cheese.

He tries to board a flight in first class, court automatically changes his seat to a aisle seat next to a screaming baby.

He shall have no luxury.

[–] MrVilliam 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can we form a special agency whose entire purpose is to enforce poverty and shame unto rich people who haven't paid civil judgements like this? Make a TV show from bodycam footage and it will be a net-zero agency, probably fairly profitable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Or just you know, jail them?

[–] snausagesinablanket 2 points 10 months ago

the court barges in and takes the steak away and replaces it with government cheese 🤣

[–] damnthefilibuster 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] 7u5k3n 3 points 10 months ago

I like the cut of your jib sir

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was a pretty sad day watching those two testify about the death threats they received because they passed a tic tac.

$148 million is a nice ending to that story.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately it's just a tease. Rudy is broke. They'll never see this money.

[–] Bytemeister 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Liquidate his estate, sell off all his assets and drain all his accounts. Any money he makes or gets access to can go to paying the remaining balance. He can keep enough money to be at the federal poverty line. Pissed that Alex Jones gets 100k a month while "bankrupt". Fuck that shit, you were horrible, and you have no right to live a cush life with the money you made from taking away peace and closure from others.

[–] Boddhisatva 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Indeed. Based on Forbes' reporting from earlier this years he has, or had, a net worth of around $80 million. He has an apartment currently listed for sale at around $6 million. He also owns another 12 apartments in NY, 2 mansions in TX, 2 penthouses in Manhattan, and 950 acres of Farmland in Ohio. The courts should leave him a quarter acre in Ohio to live on and liquidate all the rest or just give it to these women as part of their award. If there's no house on the Ohio farmland, the court can just arrange to have a single-wide mobile home dropped there for him to live in.

[–] Bytemeister 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He doesn't need the land if he's spending the rest of his life in prison.

[–] Boddhisatva 1 points 10 months ago

I believe that they are not allowed to take his "home" in this kind of scenario. That's why I was thinking that a mobile home on a tiny piece of land should be the bit left to him. If they can arrange that it's also polluted from that railway disaster back in February, so much the better.

If he spends the rest of his days in prison, great. But if I'm right and they have to leave him a home, then I like my plan.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

I can't speak for them, but ruining his remaining life as punishment for ruining theirs seems just.

[–] jordanlund 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

$16,171,000 to Freeman in compensatory damages for defamation;

$16,998,000 for Moss in compensatory damages for defamation;

$20 million each, or $40 million total, in compensatory damages for emotional distress;

$75 million in punitive damages for both

Interesting that they determined that he damaged Moss more than Freeman. Maybe one of them got more ugly threats than the other.

[–] pacoo2454 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Knowing very little of the facts, maybe it’s because Moss is younger and will be missing out on more income, since neither of them can get a job anymore. But that’s just my uneducated guess for the difference.

[–] SCB 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is what I'm curious about - assuming he doesn't pay, by claiming he's destitute, what other recourse do these people have? Their lives are completely upended, and they absolutely deserve this money.

[–] Mamertine 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In a state case they'd hire the sheriff to cease all his property and sell it at auction. Since it's federal, I assume the US Marshalls play the role of the sheriff.

[–] TrickDacy 2 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

That's like... a lot. I bet he's sweating black sweat from his forehead right now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

thats a coffin nail for this piece of shit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The decision comes at the end of a week-long federal civil trial in Washington D.C., where an eight-person jury heard from the workers — Wandrea "Shaye" Moss and her mother Ruby Freeman — about how 2020 election conspiracies spread by Giuliani and former President Donald Trump turned their lives upside down.

Jurors heard numerous violent and racist voicemails the women received, after Giuliani used his massive platform as a campaign attorney for Trump to spread lies about their actions as election workers in Georgia.

It's not the only legal trouble for Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor and two-term New York City mayor, related to his efforts to subvert Georgia's 2020 election.

Freeman broke down crying Wednesday as she described leaving her home after receiving a warning from the FBI that her life could be at risk.

I hope the federal government hangs you and your daughter from the Capitol dome," said one message Freeman received at the time.

"Mr. Sibley has a hard job," said Judge Howell at one point, after it came out that Giuliani had continued to lie about the women while talking to reporters on the courthouse steps earlier in the week.


The original article contains 688 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 10 months ago

I'd rather see him rotting in a jail cell but I'll take it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I’m happy af about the judgement, but they’ll likely never receive a penny.