this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
903 points (95.7% liked)

World News

39101 readers
5174 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deweydecibel 211 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Rolling Stone first out of the gate with the true elbow-drop of a headline this news deserves, and a beefy polemic to back it up.

This article, along with every other news site's, has been sitting there primed and ready to release for years and years, needing nothing but a minor edit to add the relevant details of his passing and the date. Someone at Rolling Stone is delighted today to have finally hit "Publish" .

And too right they should. It's a great day.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago

I like to imagine that whenever there was a particularly slow day or someone was particularly stressed, they just opened the prepared article and tweaked and improved it a bit ... it's probably the collaborative work of many people over many years.

[–] Witchfire 17 points 11 months ago

Every other news article is like

"Henry Kissinger, diplomat beloved by the wealthy, is dead at 100"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jakdracula 119 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with: Henry Kissinger, war criminal and complete piece of shit, has finally died. The world is a better place now.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The world would have been a better place if somebody had made a better decision 101 years ago.

[–] Aceticon 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Whilst I would love to think that all that it would have taken for the World to be a much better place since the later part of the XX century was but one coitus interruptus, I'm almost certain that in the US there was and always has been a long line of sociopaths willint to advise the for the deaths of millions of others for personal upside maximization whilst calling it just realpolitik, any of which would've taken the place of this one has his daddy chosen to pull out at the last minute.

Had Kissinger raised to be the consiglieri of power in, say, Canada, he would've had quite a different impact in the World.

[–] Land_Strider 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What gets me is this actually. This news of death of Henry Kissinger is nothing but a circlejerk of American's absolving all their guilty conscious of the warmongering and general malevolent meddling in other people's businesses and resources. As if they did anything until this asshole reached a very very generous age of 100, all while living in luxury.

The public had done nothing about these unjust warmongering and coups and insurgencies and such, maybe except the hippy times during vietnam war, and their presidents will do nothing to change the American international affairs (while having fairly different internal policies). Both the presidents and the population will keep blaming figureheads like Kissinger, possibly Blinken in the next decade and such names, while complicit in enjoying the benefits of resources acquired at the expense of 3rd world nations and their populations.

Hell after seeing how he lived till 100 in luxury despite the fact that he is such a piece of shit to a global degree, I would recommend aspiring to be such a piece of shit for luxury and power over billions of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Siegfried 88 points 11 months ago (7 children)

This is well known, but I think it suits this thread well

Once you’ve been to Cambodia, you’ll never stop wanting to beat Henry Kissinger to death with your bare hands. You will never again be able to open a newspaper and read about that treacherous, prevaricating, murderous scumbag sitting down for a nice chat with Charlie Rose or attending some black-tie affair for a new glossy magazine without choking. [...] Witness what Henry did in Cambodia- the fruits of his genius for statesmanship- and you will never understand why he’s not sitting in the dock at The Hague next to Milošević. While Henry continues to nibble nori rolls and remake at A-list parties, Cambodia, the neutral nation he secretly and illegally bombed, invaded, under-mined, and then threw to the dogs, is still trying to raise itself up on its one remaining leg.

Anthony Bourdain

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

God damn it, why couldn't it have been Kissinger who killed himself?

I guess because Bourdain had a soul and Kissinger didn't.

[–] ManOMorphos 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The wrong people tend to kill themselves in general. Those who commit the worst acts usually have supremely high self-confidence and self-assurance.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MindSkipperBro12 73 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Saddest part is that he gets to die living a long, comfortable life after making his mark upon the world, meaning he gets to die happy.

[–] Deestan 41 points 11 months ago

Don't celebrate that he died. Mourn that he lived.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago

And the cherry on top is the Nobel 'peace' prize.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The world order that he helped to create has spent the last few decades crumbling, so perhaps he wasn't as happy as you might think. I can only hope.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Snapz 70 points 11 months ago

Anthony Bourdain, a well spoken man who reached his boiling point with existence a fair bit to soon, always had a lot to say about Kissinger. An excerpt from a book he wrote "about" culinary tourism from, if anyone wasn't aware...

[–] slaacaa 61 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The title is strong, but article itself is brutal

[–] lulztard 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

three and four million people

That would make the list go: Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Kissinger. With the difference that the US has been a terrorist state for over a hundred years, while the other names on the list have been individuals while Kissingers was part of a greater evil.

[–] Badgernomics 36 points 11 months ago (5 children)

The 'Behind the Bastards' 6 part series on him was fucking brilliant, well worth a listen. Also, if BtB has to do a 6 part series to cover all the fucked up shit you did...? You're one of histories greatest monsters....

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] XaeroDegreaz 23 points 11 months ago (7 children)

You think because the names you listed were leaders of their countries doesn't make them part of a greater evil? No one person commits atrocities alone; there must be some backing.

One single name doesn't get to make decisions... There must be a greater body at play. There has to be support of some sort, otherwise the people would have just said no, and killed that person.

[–] lulztard 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'd rather not have an internet argument, but I'll give you a pointer that you can use to google for more information of the issue is of actual interest to you:

  • Mao, Stalin and Hitler were tyrants that forced their way to leadership and killed everyone who opposed them. Kissinger was the advisor of a terrorist government that existed long before him and will continue to exist.

  • "just said no, and killed that person" is a naive Disney fantasy. In actual reality people that "just say no" get vanished, tortured and killed. And their neighbours suddenly turn reaaally quiet after that. However, there is always a certain joint guitl and complicity, I agree with that. And it weighs especially heavy if "the people" are very free to protest their nation's terrorism but don't do so.

There is a big difference between a single dictator being a plague upon the world for the 10-50 years he's in power, and an nation with constently changing leadership being a permanent plague upon this world for 100+ years.

That's the reason why Kissinger sticks out of the list: Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Kissinger*.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] agent_flounder 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ours 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which can be blamed on... Kissinger!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My great Aunt had a terrific joke about Henry:

Nixon is walking outside the Whitehouse near an area of freshly fallen snow.

He sees NIXON SUCKS in yellow snow and asks the Secret Service (and the FBI) to investigate who did it.

A couple days go by and someone from the FBI Forensics Lab comes into the Oval Office to report.

"Well?" Nixon asked.

"You're not gonna like this."

"Just tell me."

"It's Henry's."

"I knew it!"

"Ah. That's not all Mr. President."

"What else?"

"It's Pat's handwriting."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Pat Ryan, wife of Richard Nixon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 months ago

Ding dong the witch is dead!

[–] TallonMetroid 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

About fucking time, holy shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago

Best example of The good die young I have ever seen.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's a shame he never faced justice for his crimes.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

As is typical for most USA sponsored terrorists, especially those that call the shots in 'murica

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And not a single tear was shed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Plenty of tears >!of joy!< were shed

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

After reading the article, I'm left with the impression that, if he wasn't jew, he'd be right at home with the german nazi govt. Not necessarily because of racial bias, but because of his anticommunism and also for being able to direct the military against unsuspecting targets for the sole purpose of solidifying power.

[–] T00l_shed 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] AutistoMephisto 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I love that they added the part where he said "Any people that's been persecuted for two thousand years must have done something wrong."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So are we all just going to wait for the ruling class to die off like he did or are we going to stand for justice and do something about the other evil motherfuckers in the elite still living?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I heard Henry Kissinger ran into a tree and all his money fell out of his pockets and the teens called him Sonic the Bitchhog while he tried to get at least one coin so he could go on.

[–] margaritox 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Can someone please explain what he did to be labeled a war criminal?

Genuine question, because I only know this guy as an asshole who suggested Ukraine should give up it’s occupied territories.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

He's got a 6-8 part Behind the Bastard series about him but the article here is a tldr. Basically he is directly responsible for killing about four million people, basically carpet bombed Vietnam and was in Watergate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

He (and Ford) came to Indonesia during Soeharto's New Order and endorsed invasion of East Timor. That was one day before the invasion happened.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nixon, Reagan, Bush 1, Thatcher, Mao, Thọ, and many more scumbags welcome this monster in hell. Disgusting.

[–] xc2215x 8 points 11 months ago

Won't miss him.

load more comments
view more: next ›