this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
478 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3647 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The order also explicitly limits Trump’s ability to attack witnesses or his co-defendants, including on social media.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 242 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Feels a bit ridiculous.

Even low-balling Trump's supposed wealth, that's like setting bond for the average person at $7.50.

[–] FlyingSquid 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Different rules when you're rich.

[–] GrammatonCleric 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or at least pretending to be rich 😉

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

Does it matter? His fans have probably already donated thrice that amount while feeling smug.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

He's pretending to be obscenely rich while he's just quite rich.

[–] derpo 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy shit dude they might as well have set the bond at $130k to coincide with his Stormy Daniels payment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let's just up it to 2M so we can fund MARTA.

[–] buddhabound 8 points 1 year ago

I love MARTA. I also know it has its problems. As a neighbor from a nearby small city, I don't even have a business stop within 5 miles of my house. I love being able to take MARTA all over place in Atlanta with a day pass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It really does. As in... we know you're not going to be able to resist threatening jurors and will have to forfeit this bond so we'll give you a nice low bond.

[–] LEDZeppelin 8 points 1 year ago

“They let you do anything when you’re rich”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So another $200k deducted from his re-election donations then.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Keep in mind, you only have to post 10% to get out, so $20K.

What's $20K to him if he skates?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Isn't the full amount posted by somebody? And if you leave the bondsman can find you and take you to the cops?

Don vs Dog the bounty hunter would be a battle of the bad haircuts

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dog the Bounty Hunter tackling Trump is such an absurdly perfect image. I'll expect to see a New York Times article about it in a month.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Given that we're in the dumbest time line, this is actually a plausible scenario.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah I’d be curious to see what happens if he skips, because he has Secret Service protection for the rest of his life.

The Secret Service has an obligation to protect him, but they’re also federal officers. Would they protect him from the bounty hunters? Would they rat him out? Would they act as the bounty hunters and drag him back to the courthouse against his will?

It also raises questions about a potential conviction. If he gets convicted, will the Secret Service simply post extra guards specifically for his (isolated) prison cell? They’d probably want to try and outsource it to the prison directly, but then you run into the issue of having a person who still has Top Secret clearance and has proven to be irresponsible with it being guarded by people who don’t have that clearance. The Secret Service would probably need to clear several of their members and post them there as guards, simply to prevent Don from blabbing national secrets to anyone who will listen. Basically, limit his contact to only people who also have clearance.

Regardless, I’d pay good money to get a livestream of the bounty hunters taking Don down.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SheeEttin 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yes, it's usually 10% if you go to a bail bondsman. And yes, you still owe them if you skip out, and they can hunt you down.

I don't think the secret service would let that happen though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You mean the same secret service that deleted subpeonaed evidence to protect themselves and trump?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That's "subpoenaed."

It looks just as ridiculous, maybe more.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (13 children)

That's like fucking nothing to the mega rich like Trump.

The fact that we have a two-tiered justice system couldn't be more obvious than a rich white politician getting slapped on the wrist despite leading an insurrection against American democracy while poor black men are killed in the street by militant cops for literally no reason. Gross on so many levels.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

That's only if you get a bondsman to pay the rest of it. Knowing trump, anyone in their right mind wouldn't put 180k of their own money down thinkimg the fat idiot won't run his mouth and violate the terms of his bond.

But then again, if they were in their right minds, they wouldn't support him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

This is somewhat misleading. If you have the money for bond you typically just pay it yourself because a bail bondsman keeps some of the money when it's returned.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I like Presidents who don't have a bail bondsman

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I want to see Dog the Bounty Hunter chasing him down.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck 8 points 1 year ago

But I like this ex-president having one :)

[–] jeffw 7 points 1 year ago

I mean, he probably just paid it in cash lol. I don’t think he needed a bondsman. Worst case scenario, send out a fundraising email and he’d have the money in an hour or less

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eran_morad 42 points 1 year ago

Traitor cunt.

[–] Tedesche 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So, what happens if he violates the gag order? Can they lock him up or is just a pithy fine?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He hasn't got in any trouble yet for violating gag orders. I'm not hopeful about justice being served this time around.

[–] Tedesche 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like the fact that it's an actual bond condition this time might motivate the judge to actually enforce it, but I understand your pessimism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If he violates the bond terms, they can throw him right into jail.

[–] Tedesche 11 points 1 year ago

Great. Fingers crossed that he's stupid/impulsive enough to do it and the judge actually has the chutzpa to put him in the clink.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The judge has every right to revoke bail and lock him up if he breaks those terms. I'm not betting any money on that actually happening, but if the law were applied equally he'd be denied bail and in prison until trial already.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks 17 points 1 year ago

I wonder how long it will take Trump to break parole. It is not a question of if, just a question of when. And then the reaction of the court will most likely show the inequality of the American justice system. Some are handled more equal than others.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

There's not enough zeros there.

[–] drdabbles 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The question I have is what if he violates any of the terms? It's not like they're going to throw him in jail with some secret service people guarding him. So it feels more like a show than anything with real force behind it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he gets arrested later when he surrenders, beside a mugshot, do they also weigh Trump? Measure his height?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›