this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
283 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2437 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Donald Trump on Sunday called for recusal of the judge presiding over the federal case that alleges he illegally conspired to overturn his election loss to President Joe Biden in 2020.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AFKBRBChocolate 124 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He has not, will not, and can not provide any reason for why she should recuse herself or in what why she's biased. He's just scared because she's been tough on insurrectionists so far.

There was a former solicitor general on NPR the other day who said that conservatives should want liberal judges, not conservative judges, when they're on trial. The reason being that liberal judges tend to be sticklers for defendants' rights, regardless of circumstances.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

20 years in prison is the likely outcome. Now that prison will be a hotel suite and Trump will likely have access to social media where he will claim to be a political prisoner, but he won't be playing golf or riding down golden elevators.

[–] Cabrio 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eran_morad 16 points 1 year ago (14 children)

He should die in a supermax.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

because he was hoping for a white male judge

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With the way he thinks, my guess is what he wanted is a judge he appointed, figuring that judge would be "loyal."

[–] hydrospanner 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With the way Eileen Cannon has acted, can you blame him?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is just establishing the narrative. They'll deny the motion because there's no legal basis for it, and he'll go on social media and blither on about how he's the victim of an illegal witch hunt and suchlike. He knows it won't succeed, but he doesn't need it to succeed. He just needs to give his terrorists something to latch onto, some narrative they can take back to their echo chamber and use to morally justify more terrorism.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Funny how someone can whine about being a victim when he started out with millions of dollars and never faced real consequences for his plethora of crimes. This guy commits more crimes before breakfast than most people commit in their lifetime. Also if the White House schedule was accurate he does like nothing till late morning, so gives him more time to commit a bit of light treason to get the day started. Won't someone think of the old rich racist white once in awhile? Not knocking on white or old dudes just the racist ones with too much privilege,

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago

"BECAUSE IT'S DEVASTATING TO MY CASE!" energy.

You're allowed to seek a new judge, but you have to give a good reason that isn't "I think I'm gonna lose" and there isn't one mentioned.

[–] TokenBoomer 46 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He should be doing plea deals. The chances he gets found not guilty of 78 felony charges is minimal. His best scenario after pleading not guilty is 6 months to a year of house arrest. And that’s highly unlikely. He will do time.

[–] penguinsAreRapists 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you imagine any other citizen having 78 felony charges?

[–] TokenBoomer 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We’ve executed people for similar crimes. He’s lucky he has prominence.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@TokenBoomer

@MicroWave @penguinsAreRapists

I assume you know that Trump’s mentor, Roy Cohn, was the prosecutor in the case against the Rosenbergs. He’s named in the Wikipedia article.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That should bringer harsher penalties.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Caradoc879 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I admire your optimism and wish I could believe he'll actually face consequences.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Prosecutors don't bring cases they can't win. They just don't do it. It reflects badly on them.

Add the fact that prosecuting a former president is incredibly hard. This guy 100% did all of this shit in public. They have:

  • Witnesses
  • Tape of him doing it
  • Video of him doing it
  • The actual documents
  • Witnesses who observed his co-conspirators
  • Tape of the coverup
  • Witnesses to the coverup

There's no way anyone is getting away without a felony conviction. Plus, the lawyers involved are buttercups compared to the federal prosecutors.

I know one federal prosecutor. He is a very nice guy, very smart and will not hesitate to throw white collar criminals in jail. They ruin criminals' lives like it's their day job, because it is.

[–] TokenBoomer 20 points 1 year ago

Not a fan of the establishment, but I think they see him as a legitimate threat. The consequence of not holding him accountable is further disillusionment in the institutions that hold our society together.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he has a very high chance of dying quite soon, so there’s that!

[–] bizzle 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Evil dies hard, look at Charles Koch.

[–] reddig33 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Dick Cheney and Henry Kissinger say hello.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tater_bear 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He has no interest in any deal. He's banking it all on delay till he can get back in office and pardon himself or delay till he dies

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The chances of him getting a hung jury is actually incredibly high. I doubt they'll weed out all his supporters in jury selection. I honestly don't think they can convict him.

[–] TokenBoomer 6 points 1 year ago

The only way he’s getting a hung jury is if Hunter Biden is called. /s Bazinga!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

Right, but the judge presiding over his other case was personally appointed by Trump and has shown personal bias towards supporting Trump in the past. She hasn't recused herself yet, that makes sense right?

[–] flossdaily 30 points 1 year ago

So in this temper tantrum, he uses quotes to imply that this judge ... Wasn't actually assigned to the case? And that she can't be fair? ... Because ?

Is it Trump's brief that the only fair trail is one where the defendant had given the judge her job?

[–] eran_morad 27 points 1 year ago
[–] MicroWave 26 points 1 year ago

The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, according to the docket in federal court in Washington, D.C. Chutkan, 61, was appointed to the district in 2014 by then-President Barack Obama. She is one of the only federal judges in D.C. who has delivered sentences against defendants in cases related to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot that are longer than the sentences that the DOJ asked for, according to NBC News.

[–] OttoVonBizmarkie 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A judge who's actually handing out justice to people who commit crimes?! Can't have that with Trump as the defendant!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

yeah he wants another judge cannon to debase themselves for him for no reward.

[–] ape_arms 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is comforting to think of Trump as an idiot, and he may be, but don't disregard that he has consistently shown that he is superb at manipulating systems. This strategy is the M.O. of the wealthy who can afford legal fees and cheat the system over and over and over again. Every one of these judicial ploys seems ridiculous in itself, but taken together, they show how he can just delay/bog down the system to HIS advantage. The courts have to play by the rules, were he does not. This guy will never serve time. The only way he would is if he pissed off OTHER WEALTHY PEOPLE.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Desperate acts of desperation deserve mockery and condemnation, not serious attention. Trump can beg for whatever he wants, but that clown is going to jail.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

THERE IS NO WAY I CAN GET A FAIR TRIAL WITH THE JUDGE ‘ASSIGNED’ TO THE REDICULOUS FREEDOM OF SPEECH/FAIR ELECTIONS CASE. EVERYBODY KNOWS THIS, AND SO DOES SHE

— Donald Trump

On what grounds?

Trump previously said it would be “IMPOSSIBLE” for him to get a fair trial in Washington, in part because he has called for “a Federal TAKEOVER” of the district “in order to bring our Capital back to Greatness,” according to posts on his social media site.

So the logic is that if I say some crazy ass shit then I can just keep delaying my trail and picking judges that I like? I don't think that's a great lead chief but let's see how that plays out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scripthook 8 points 1 year ago

My favorite line he says at his rally is "They're not coming after me, they're coming after you" - case example that the 2024 campaign is about making his greivences the greivences of his followers. Where in 2016 to his credit, he got in the White House for making other people's greivences his own.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Don't you almost wish you had a Truth Social account right now? I bet you could make S'Mores off the seething, flaming, butt-hurt coming off his feed right now ;)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

I'm happy not having one. I don't expect that to ever change.

[–] drzoidberg 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was gonna make one to troll them, but you can't make an account without linking a phone number, and I actually use my Google voice account.

[–] RunningInRVA 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And they would quickly boot you off the platform once they realize you aren’t their type.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eran_morad 6 points 1 year ago

Bruh. I'd rather stab myself with a spoon.

load more comments
view more: next ›