This sounded so reasonable I thought it was The Onion
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Who knows, perhaps they are learning to fear again
No, he's being upstaged, and that won't do.
100% this. Musk has dominated the news for the first month of his presidency, i bet he’s fucking furious
My style of deal–making is quite simple and straightforward. I aim very high, and then I just keep pushing and pushing to get what I'm [actually] after.
This way, all future cuts will seem reasonable by comparison.
“Public approval of Musk’s role is declining“
What public approval for what role?
Despite Trump affirming Cabinet authority, he warned departments to make cuts or face Musk's intervention. Lawsuits and internal resistance continue to challenge DOGE's sweeping changes.
This is the real meat of the article.
Musk makes changes to federal government.
Unelected private citizen and world’s richest parasite, so trump’s government is facing a swathe of lawsuits and they are afraid.
Trump orders the individual departments to do “exactly as Musk would do” or else he will get someone else to do their job for them.
Basically DOGE is too much of a lawsuit magnet so he’s threatening a broad selection of faceless government departments to do the exact same thing, in the hope it’s harder to trace and sue with class action
why would trump be concerned about law suits? "he is the law"
He is trying to close the barn after all the horses left.
Musk is insufferable. I've been waiting for the Trump/Musk lover affair to end. This might be some of it.
I would LOVE for Trump to go all anti Musk and cancel SpaceX. I seriously think this is in the future and it's going to be glorious.
"I like Billionaires whose rockets don't asplode."
I'd settle for rockets that explode with billionaires in them.
The dog trying to put a leash on his master.
Trump's ego can't handle feeling like second.
Regardless of what is actually going on, Musk is dominating news cycles just as much or more than Trump.
This will become interesting because Project 2025 doesn't include plans for a third term. They want an "experienced CEO" so most likely Elon.
they want Vance. must is a useful idiot for them
Elon isn't a natural born American citizen. Hell, if they start revoking citizenship for people who lied, he's first on the chopping block.
Assuming they give a fuck about any of that. Which I'm fairly sure they don't.
I almost feel sorry for that Amy scapegoat that will take the fall instead of Elmo
Keep pushing and putting pressure. This is a sign that Trump (or more likely people close to Trump) are starting to see the pressure as more serious. He's seeing backlash from lawsuits & the courts, federal worker unions, protests and people getting loud as hell at Republican town halls, etc.
Don't take their word as truth here instead take it as a sign they might actually be starting to see him as a threat to their power / approval