this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
231 points (98.7% liked)

News

25621 readers
4151 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Social Security Administration plans to reduce its workforce by 7,000 to 30,000 employees, potentially reducing its current workforce of 60,000 by up to 50%.

The agency plans "significant workforce reductions," reassignments, and voluntary separations. Office leases in multiple states are already being terminated.

Critics warn this will severely impact service delivery to 72.5 million beneficiaries, causing field office closures and longer wait times.

The move sparks concerns about reduced access to benefits and comes amid existing understaffing and looming funding challenges.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Of all the leopards coming home to roost, these are the ones I was most anticipating.

[–] Canopyflyer 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Quite the metaphor mixing you're doing there.

Must say I rather like it.

[–] stopdropandprole 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

there's going to be a significant increase in homeless grandparents

who do you think will be buying up all those homes, all that sweet easy money passive income generating real estate?

a handful of ultra wealthy parasites are looting the country just to add a few zeros to the ends of their bank accounts.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Before going homeless, there will be a massive uptick in reverse mortgages. Remember that most retirees were able to buy houses back when they were super cheap. A reverse mortgage gives them income while effectively selling the equity in their home. As is often the case, they will be screwing over their kids and grandkids. There won't even be a house (owned) to inherit upon their death.

The executor will be forced to sell the house to pay off the reverse mortgage, often at a discount, to exactly the types you describe.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago

They won't need employees, because there GOP will remove social security all together.

[–] finitebanjo 28 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If they were afraid of fraud they wouldn't be firing the office workers and secretary general.

It seems like they want more fraud.

[–] halcyoncmdr 17 points 4 days ago

Of course they do. Then they'll point to the increased fraud as an excuse to disband the entire program.

[–] stopdropandprole 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I see... and is the fraud in the room with us right now, Elon?

[–] capt_wolf 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Cool, it already takes 4-8 months for SS to get things done for my clients. I can't wait for it to take over a year. I guess I should take solace in the fact that I probably won't even have a job anymore in that time, since Trump is also going to cut Medicaid and probably every other source of income my company receives. My guys will go back to the hospital before inevitably being turned out on the street when the hospitals are no longer funded either. Guess I really don't need to worry after all. I'm gonna have so much free time!

God bless America! 🇺🇸🫡

[–] thingAmaBob 3 points 4 days ago

My boss is retiring and the amount of work they had to do just to get everything setup is insane. They had to take off work so many times just to speak with people in person at the local offices or to do research so that they choose the right medical plan. Luckily they have their wits about them and retirement money from the company. I can’t imagine anyone who is in a less fortunate or less stable situation trying to get any of this done themselves. I know they say you should have 1-2 years of expenses saved up in cash before retirement, but what about those who need it yesterday? The only two questions should be 1)are you X years or older? and 2)are you a citizen of the USA?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Helpful acronym explainer:

SSA = Social Security Administration

USSS = US Secret Service

SS = I guess ICE nowadays? Or the DOJ as a whole?

[–] whostosay 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What the fuck kind of math is that up top?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah honestly I have no idea how many people are losing their jobs there

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As I understand it:

Currently Social Security employs about 60,000 workers.

They’re looking to cut a minimum of 7,000 employees and a maximum of 30,000 employees.

If they cut 30,000 from the existing 60,000 it would represent a 50% reduction in workforce.

The way they worded it is absolutely stupid.

[–] whostosay 2 points 3 days ago

That makes sense. Godamn journalism is dead.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nobody who has a secure retirement should be allowed to touch the social security system.

To that end, I propose seizure of the assets of Trump/Musk/et-al so that they have some skin in the game when they propose changes to the administration.

The claimed assets could be used to fund operations as part of the exchange, saving money for the taxpayers.

[–] stopdropandprole 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

tax the rich.

if they don't comply, seize their assets.

if citizens can be 'civil asset forfeiture'd for being suspected of a crime, then billionaires can have their accounts seized and lands taken for tax evasion. but how do we make the politicians afraid enough to actually do it?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

Who could have predicted this would have led to massive fraud. When I first saw headlines about the cuts that certainly wasn't immediately obvious to me! Oh, woe is me... were that I was wiser all those months ago!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Get a government job they said. Employment will be stable they said.

Luckily I didn't listen.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

ah. so. musk. yeah. legitamate users have a harder time getting it quickly as they need it and illegitamate users have an easier time finding cracks to crawl through. brilliant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Retirement security shouldn’t come with a side of bureaucratic roulette.

😺😺