this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
987 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19948 readers
3962 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the very essence of the difference that should exist between a President and a King. From Federalist 69:

The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. In this delicate and important circumstance of personal responsibility, the President of Confederated America would stand upon no better ground than a governor of New York, and upon worse ground than the governors of Maryland and Delaware.

The failure of the Republican party to support this kind of check on Presidential power is why we're having this crisis now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal"

-- Richard Nixon, 1977.

You've had 47 years to do something about this, to be able to hold your leaders accountable, and apparently it wasn't worth the effort.

I guess the upside is you won't have to worry about all that wasteful election spending any more. 👍

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

You don't understand (or maybe you do but aren't saying it). The Nixon scandal is what started the modern shitshow as we know it. Nixon's supporters would be royally pissed that there was no specific media apparatus to fully support Nixon and his shit. They would go on to fight to repeal the fairness doctrine and to start Fox News and the modern propaganda media as we know it.

BTW, a few years ago (during Trump's first administration or a bit after) they even SAID 'when the president does it , it isn't not illegal' or some slight word difference as a way of signalling their ultimate victory in trying to do what they wanted to have happened during Nixon's scandals.

[–] Hobbes_Dent 8 points 1 day ago

Oh, they’ll still allow that spending to show how many votes he gets next time. Like the other dictators do.

[–] Jhex 51 points 1 day ago

Once again, to no-one's surprise. Trump loudly claimed he would do this long ago

Choose a felon as President, expect him to commit crimes... enjoy

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I mean, the constitution never said the supreme court has the power of judivial review, the supreme court at the time just grabbed the power, and congress at the time just went along with it. The supreme court only held on to the power because of "norms and traditions". Today's congress could simply just pass a resolution declaring the supreme court has no such power, and all that 200+ years of "norms and traditions" is gone. And all the law enforcement, national guard, and military people would just be like "seems legit" and go along with everything trump decrees.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

yeah but this isn't about judicial review

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Dear Americans, where are your protests?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago

There's protests in every state. The media is just ignoring them.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the mainstream news isn’t covering them… they also edited out people booing trump at the super bowl and edited in cheers

[–] a_g_dizzle 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Do you have a link for the Superbowl edits?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

There are more people on the streets when a new iphone is released

[–] Kayday 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

You need more disruptive protests.

Americans have been trained to clutch their pearls but that disrupting commerce with protests is wrong and that's exactly what we're seeing: complaints but no disruptive action so they are easily ignored.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustZ 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These are unamerican people.

[–] Theonetheycall1845 5 points 1 day ago

And people voted for this!! I feel like I'm in some fucking fever dream.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't the failure of the Republican party. This is their victory dance.

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla 7 points 1 day ago

Seriously, this has been the Republican wet dream for decades.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

UNLESS they rule AGAINST Working Class Bailouts. THEN the Courts SHOULD be Listened to!

[–] mRbLUE 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Groundwork for a coup by the sounds of it. When the next election is supposed to happen I wonder if he'll declare martial law due to some invented issue.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Groundwork for a coup by the sounds of it.

GROUNDWORK??!!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

~~Groundwork for~~ a coup by the sounds of it.

fixed it

[–] demizerone 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That fucking Lizard Peter Thiel fucking rebooted when asked about the popular support for Luigi. The mother fucker had not thought about what happens when we the people get tired of their shit and unite against them. They've spent so much time and money dividing us so they can take it all it never occurred that it might backfire.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That blubbering little weasel. “Y-y-you have to find another way.” I think was the line he used. We tried other ways. Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent revolution inevitable. Luigi showed how to fight back with some effect.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thiel, Yarvin etc., are all so convinced of their own superiority that any actual challenge to their world view/tactics is completely unexpected. They can only comprehend doing violence to people who won't do anything about it. They get their rocks off over child murderers, and state sanctioned violence, but cry when the people they want to step on show and ounce of spine. It's pathetic.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

There was a former employee of Elon Musk who said that when he stood up to Elon that one time and actually said that his ideas and style are terrible, he said that he never saw a man's face turn so white so fast, that Musk became super pale (even compared to his normal ultra-pale complexion) and that Musk's only response was to yell fuck you.

He had no concept whatsoever of anyone, much less someone working for him, to dare question him in any way.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fuck these bastards

[–] Jumi 68 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Time to use those guns you've been hoarding. Wasn't that the reason you're even allowed to have them?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I add the following as evidence of premeditation / conspiracy:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04/inside-the-new-right-where-peter-thiel-is-placing-his-biggest-bets

“I think Trump is going to run again in 2024,” he [Vance] said. “I think that what Trump should do, if I was giving him one piece of advice: Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people.”

“And when the courts stop you,” he went on, “stand before the country, and say—” he quoted Andrew Jackson, giving a challenge to the entire constitutional order—“the chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.”

This is a description, essentially, of a coup.

“We are in a late republican period,” Vance said later, evoking the common New Right view of America as Rome awaiting its Caesar. “If we’re going to push back against it, we’re going to have to get pretty wild, and pretty far out there, and go in directions that a lot of conservatives right now are uncomfortable with.”

“Indeed,” Murphy said. “Among some of my circle, the phrase ‘extra-constitutional’ has come up quite a bit.”

Historical note: as far as I understand, president Jackson ignored the Supreme Court in a case of Georgia taking Cherokee lands. Since the state also ignored, the court failed to enforce its ruling.

[–] Snapz 159 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the step where the cart goes over the top of the hill, you're not coming back if this starts.

Hard to hear, but if goes forward, this does signal that it's breaking windows time. We all have a Luigi line, start really considering where yours is...

Especially if you're young, and they are doing this before you have been able to establish your own career or a family of your own, the rest of the world needs your strength and energy in these moments. Make no mistake, they are threatening you directly, they want to sell your future for a small profit added to the pile they are hoarding. Decide how hard you want to fight against that

[–] untorquer 90 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Especially if you're older and know that everything you've worked for is at risk. Especially if you're middle aged and your hope of a comfortable old age is being destroyed. Especially if you have family, and know your children's future depends on it.

I know you mean well but fuck ageism, the youth always fight. They don't need a pep talk, older people do.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But he said he'd only be a dictator for one day! Are you saying that's not how dictatorships work?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

It is written into their plan, not a surprise at all "ignore the courts".

[–] jordanlund 204 points 1 day ago (15 children)

"Oh, shit, so you mean Biden could have just cancelled all that student debt anyway?"

"Well of course not, don't be stupid!"

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Pollo_Jack 100 points 1 day ago (14 children)

So, those 2A people being real fuckin quiet now that an actual tyrant is in play.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Is it time to petition the military to intervene?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When I was little, long before I had a reason to want it to be true, I had this theory that the Secret Service, which is obviously not a secret, was called that because they had a secret mandate: If the President ever gets really out of pocket and goes for dictator powers, it's their job to execute him as a traitor.

Anyway, I doubt it's true, but I've been thinking about it a lot lately.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›