this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
370 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19677 readers
5137 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Brilliant idea

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 145 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The Trump administration is systematically purging anyone who worked on the investigations into his criminal activities.

If that isn't sufficient to trigger a significant response from the Senate all by itself, then they're rather obviously part of the problem, and likely complicit in Trump's current ongoing efforts to overthrow the US government and repace it with a plutocratic autocracy with himself as supreme ruler.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Speaking with host Alex Witt, Frank Figliuzzi, who served as assistant director for counterintelligence at the FBI, claimed there is a strong possibility that almost half of the department's employees could be forced out, thereby putting the nation's security at extreme risk.

Imagine you were a hostile foreign power and you wanted to take down your competition once and for all. You might seek out a power-hungry public figure who cared more about themselves than their country, and who could be easily manipulated, blackmailed if necessary (so you'd want someone seedy), and offer them a personal reward if they dismantled their country's government and public institutions and sabotaged its alliances and trade partnerships. If your hostile foreign power was also a socially backwards and racist, you might encourage their own racism and prejudices to punish mostly liberal LGBTQ+ people and kick out or imprison the low-paid immigrants who help the country function. It would be terrible if something like that were to happen in real life and the people were just to allow it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

I've been deliberately avoiding addressing that whole aspect of it, since Trump and Musk are the obvious primary insurrectionists - the day-to-day leaders of this brazen attempt to overthrow the US government and install a plutocratic autocracy in its place.

But yes.

[–] just_another_person 16 points 1 day ago

We know that because it out in the open. Under oath admissions of collusion is the best way to get people against these assholes though, and possibly get them in jail when that is convenient again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Taco Supreme

[–] eran_morad 3 points 23 hours ago

got some news for ye bruh...

[–] SinningStromgald 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or just, ya know, pick somone who isnt a fucking conspiracy nut hack instead of confirming Trumps moronic picks.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 21 hours ago

This guy was always a bastard. So of course Trump's bootlickers love him.

[–] reddig33 24 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It’s too late. There are no “takesie backsies”.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 22 hours ago

Senate urged to do any kind of governing whatsoever

[–] homesweethomeMrL 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Urged”

I see no one has learned a goddamn fucking thing.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

“Urged” I see no one has learned a goddamn fucking thing.

It was a former FBI official that (as you put it) "Urged" Senate.

That's because he can't do anything else. It is on us to join him and also put pressure on politicians, but looks like it is easier to just fart on a chair and swipe down the feed than do anything.

We are currently in a middle of a coup, and we really need to put a resistance: https://snyder.substack.com/p/the-logic-of-destruction

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 minutes ago

What is OP doing about it? Only one I see doing anything is Luigi.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

I just hope all the good feds made an undeletable backup lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago

*Fash Patel

[–] eran_morad 9 points 23 hours ago

The servile republican traitor filth will do no such thing.

[–] takeheart 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

This guy literally wrote a book about what he dubs "the executive branch deep state" including a list of high profile names he wants to target.

It's all out in the open. Confirmation hearings are supposed to weed out people like him.

Edit: the way I previously worded my comment it might have been construed as me stating Patel was rightfully going after these people. Instead I meant to indicate that they rightfully resisted/investigated Trump.

[–] btaf45 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

“deep state”

That is really just a synonym for "democratic state". Whenever someone attacks the "deep state", they actually mean "democratic state". Whenever you come across the phrase, "deep state", just auto-correct it in your own mind to "democratic state" for crystal clarity.

[–] takeheart 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, there's nothing wrong with career bureaucrats // civil servants per se. ¿Do you want to swap out every geologist, accountant, teacher, interpreter, ranger, manager, safety inspector, lawyer, technician, secretary every 4 years? These people literally run the country and by extension allow society to continue. And they are part of the idea that power and expertise are spread amongst many people.

Is it fair to criticize individuals, agencies, institutions. Yes. Is there corruption, mismanagement, incompetence? All the time, happens for any sufficiently large enough organization.

But no need to spin this into some bonkers conspiracy theory.

[–] btaf45 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Do you want to swap out every geologist, accountant, teacher, interpreter, ranger, manager, safety inspector, lawyer, technician, secretary every 4 years?

You would never ever want any of these people dependent on politics and politicians. That is exactly what caused this:

https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/c05/venezuelan-oil-industry-collapse-economic-social-and-political-implications

[–] takeheart 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm this section sounds familiar:

The persecution drove hundreds of directors, managers and workers – including the author – into exile and/or imprisonment. In their place, the government appointed political operators, lacking knowledge and experience in the oil sector, who provided unconditional support to Maduro’s policies but damaged the company’s operational capacities, bypassing all control or accountability mechanisms.

That's essentially what Trump admin wants to do. Fire civil servants en masse, replace with loyalists (proficiency for the job is optional).Then if something is goes wrong, and it will, just blame it on DEI, Biden, wokeness or something.

[–] btaf45 1 points 2 hours ago

Hmm this section sounds familiar:

There is another parallel between Venezuela and Traitorapist Trump. Like us and Nazi Germany, their whole mess happened because they allowed a failed coup leader to come to power who should have been disqualified from the start.

[–] just_another_person 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] takeheart 4 points 23 hours ago

I've updated my initial comment.