this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
255 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

61300 readers
2771 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I wonder what his first clue was.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 hours ago

Usually when a company says something like that (doesn't matter what they're trying to peddle or what the statement was about), what they actually mean is that they were on the wrong side of morality, common sense, and/or the law.

[–] Siegfried 15 points 6 hours ago

OpenAI wont have a place in history... just another random company

[–] [email protected] 151 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Sam Altman is a hack and a fraud. He’s on the wrong side of everything.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I've found that the ChatGPT's greatest use to me has been as a rhetorical device.

I've found myself using ChatGPT as a reference when dismissing a statement that is impressive in its diluted lack of sincerity or creative thinking.

For instance, I read this article and thought how every answer literally sounds like the result you'd get if you asked the question to ChatGPT, prefacing each prompt with "Answer the following question as one would if they were executing an unrestrained profit-driven business strategy while seeking to appeal to investors and reassure critics without committing to any specific principle."

He is somewhat exceptional in his ability to say completely transparent bullshit as well as his ability to take the most obvious, unsubtly selfish and evil business strategy at on literally every decision.

What an assclown. He is a world-class assclown.

[–] MolecularCactus1324 17 points 18 hours ago

He’s failed up his entire career

[–] RedditWanderer 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It feels so good he got wrecked.

[–] Xanthobilly 13 points 16 hours ago

I wish. The government and SoftBank are about to have him fail up further.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago

If only they were successfully able to get him out of the company

[–] vane 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Valmond 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago
[–] tabular 196 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

The software company has "Open" in their name and yet makes proprietary software, the first clue 🫠

[–] [email protected] 29 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

After seeing that the public was willing to call DeepSeek “open source” for releasing 800 lines of Python, an opaque model, and a PDF vaguely describing (or just praising) the proprietary training framework… Yeah, I imagine he feels like he missed an opportunity.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's been a few days and a simple search reveals it's already been reproduced by many different bodies using the "vague" pdf. What's this disservice for?

[–] KingRandomGuy 1 points 44 minutes ago

TBH the paper is a bit light on the details, at least compared to the standards of top ML conferences. A lot of DeepSeek's innovations on the engineering front aren't super well documented (at least well enough that I could confidently reproduce them) in their papers.

[–] MITM0 6 points 11 hours ago

At least we have HuggingFace

[–] paraphrand 124 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Beyond prompting OpenAI to reconsider its release philosophy, Altman said that DeepSeek has pushed the company to potentially reveal more about how its so-called reasoning models, like the o3-mini model released today, show their “thought process.” Currently, OpenAI’s models conceal their reasoning, a strategy intended to prevent competitors from scraping training data for their own models.

“In light of DeepSeek showing how straightforward the text we were hiding is, and because we actually don’t have much secret sauce, we’ll show you the text, now.

But we’ll probally do the same thing again if we figure something new out. You can’t hold us to it.”

[–] [email protected] 32 points 21 hours ago

DING DING DING DING

[–] eager_eagle 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I could see this coming a parsec away lol.

How's this different than a self reflecting agent you can write today? I thought when o1 was announced, while some people were excited, even calling it some sort of proto AGI.

OpenAI is great at raising money and just feeds from the hype.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Great at raising money, even better at giving it to nvidia

[–] just_another_person 35 points 21 hours ago

LOLZ. JFC.

How much rewriting of history to justify the shit you're doing do you need in a week, asshole?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 21 hours ago

This has been an eventful week watching everything unfold in front of my eyes

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago

Recursive self-improvement is a process where an AI system could improve its own intelligence and capabilities without human input.