this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
212 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19384 readers
4252 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No further info in the article as it's breaking news. NBC broke into the inauguration to announce it.

Biden pardoned his entire family and their spouses as Trump directly threatened all of them.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Since when do pardons protect you from future crimes?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

In the US it's just basically untested, but it probably wouldn't hold up but you can still write it on the paper 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

With the Trump appointed supreme court it definitely won't hold up, but maybe it could delay whatever meaningless charges he can come up with long enough for another election. If we're lucky enough to have another real election that is at least.

[–] Boddhisatva 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think they are preemptive pardons in the sense that they are pardons for future crimes. They are pardons for unspecified past crimes that have not yet been charged. That is not unheard of. For example, Carted issued blanket pardons for everyone who dodged the draft during the Vietnam war whether they had been charged or not.

Where it is untested is if he tried to pardon himself. That has never been tested in the courts and is generally considered invalid on the premise that you cannot be the judge in your own trial.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

So basically it just sets the statue of limitations of everything to 0?

So if we find out one of these people raped someone at some point before this pardon, there will be no justice?

[–] jpreston2005 102 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Giving his family the last train car out of germany before the third reich shuts down the border.

[–] Fredselfish 33 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

They may want do just that. Do anyone believe Trump will honor these pardons. Also are they even valid if they haven't been charged with a crime.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 hours ago

It’s not about whether or not he honors them. The effectiveness of those preemptive pardons can be adjudicated by the SC. But there’s a couple of considerations on that front:

  • will the SC concur that blanket pardons in advance of any charges are actually allowed?
  • will Trump want to challenge that, since it would potentially kneecap any effort he makes later in that regard?

But also:

  • will Trump or the SC give a shit about the blatant hypocrisy and double standard if they do strike down this sort of thing from Biden, but let Trump do it? (IMO probably not)
  • if the SC gives a shit but Trump doesn’t, what’s to stop him using leverage and/or stochastic terrorism to help accelerate the conclusion of one or more justices’ tenure so he can slip someone more agreeable in?
  • will the judicial branch even exist in an independent fashion in 4 years?

TL;DR: who fuckin knows at this point

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please -2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Also are they even valid if they haven't been charged with a crime.

Accepting the pardon actually requires admitting to the crime. So yes, the pardon is valid because the person has to go “yes I did this thing, and accept that I’m being pardoned for it.” You can’t selectively accept only the latter half of the pardon. And that admission and subsequent pardon means the state can’t charge them in the future, because they already admitted to it and were pardoned for it despite that admission of guilt.

But to your earlier point, there’s not much stopping Trump from trying to go after them anyways; The SCOTUS certainly won’t get in his way.

[–] errer 1 points 3 hours ago

There’s also some period between issuing the pardon and accepting it where a pardon can be rescinded. I would think Biden already had all these people accept their pardons in advance though…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Their validity has never been constitutionally challenged. It's not really been done much in the past, the notable example being Nixon and no one challenged that.

[–] [email protected] 198 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

An outgoing president needing to pardon his family pre-emptively because the incoming president is threatening them is well along the path to fascism.

Good job electing Trump you fucking morons. I hope that the consequences of your own actions hurt you more than they hurt the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago

Sadly we would have embraced fascism whether voters elected Trump or Harris/Biden, as we've seen with the sentiment towards Palestinians.

With the former, it's fascism. With the latter, it's fascism-lite.

Ultimately, we're going to reach a chilling point that will probably demand a WWIII. When that comes has probably now been accelerated due to Trump winning.

Sanders was our key to fighting fascism. Sadly Obama, Clinton, and Biden all kneecapped him in favor of billionaires and the status quo while claiming no responsibility for the seeds they sewed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

FWIW, as an American, I really hope you're right. Because there is serious potential for us to fuck up the entire rest of the world for a very, very long time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

The US fucked up the world a long time ago, we're all entering the find out phase now.

[–] cm0002 22 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Good job electing Trump you fucking morons.

I'd like to thank the Gaza single issue voters and bLuEMagA mouth breathers, good job guys!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

To be honest, there is a lot of blame to be cast on the Dem leadership as well as the voters. They managed to run one of the most uninspiring campaigns of all time.

[–] anas 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Gaza was either not big enough to affect the result, or big enough where your candidate should have acknowledged it. You can’t have it both ways.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago

But muh scapegoat :(

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 hours ago

... well along the path to fascism.

Oh, we're already there.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair they didn’t actually elect trump, the election was clearly rigged

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. The traitor even said so last night, by dementia accident.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don’t understand why folks downvote comments pointing this out to be honest. Like bro, the man literally fucking said it out loud what more do you want. He’s quoted as saying a) Elon musk in some way stuffed the electronic ballots in PA and b) he (ie trump) wouldn’t be president if the election had not been rigged what more do you want bro serious question I’m fucking interested

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Honestly, masterful plan by the traitor's handlers. They made sure that we couldn't complain about a rigged 2024 election because of the bullshit they spread about the non-rigged 2020 one.

I guess the Nazis win.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 hours ago

Perfectly normal country

[–] Sanctus 39 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Sad. In "The Land of the Free" you should never have to do this. We are well and truly fucked if this tribalism isn't put down. Cutting into our education has done irreparable damage.

[–] PunnyName 7 points 5 hours ago

I hope everyone gets what they voted for.

Including those who didn't vote

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

I wasn’t aware that James Biden had won the Masters tournament